Monday, October 7, 2024

A DISSERTATION ON THE CHRISTOLOTY OF THE BIBLE

This is an attempt to bring some clarification to all of the unproven and misleading theories on the personhood of Jesus the Messiah, the Son of the living God Yehovah. Please read and prayerfully consider what is written herein and approach it with an open mind. Ask God for the spiritual eyes to see with and the spiritual ears to hear. I pray that God will help you to truly come to know the Messiah, the Son of God.

Shouldn’t we know our Savior? The One who redeemed us unto eternal life and shed his blood in a sin-offering sacrifice for us? But how can we know him if we have the wrong perception of who or what he actually is? How can we become like him as we’re commanded to, if we think he is something he os not? In order to know the Messiah Jesus - Yehoshua we must first lay the groundwork of knowing who or what God is.

1. How Many Gods or Persons within God?

Let’s see what the Old Testament says:

Deuteronomy 6:4: Hear, O Israel! Yehovah is God, Yehovah is one!

Isaiah 43:10: Before me there was no God formed, And there will be none after me.

Isaiah 44:6: … there is no God besides Me.

Isaiah 45:5: I am Yehovah, and there is no other; Besides me there is no God…

Isaiah 46:9: For I am God, and there is no other; {I am} God, and there is no one like me,

Let’s see what the New Testament says:

Mark 10:18: And Jesus said to him, why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.

Mark 12:29: Jesus answered, the foremost is, 'HEAR, O ISRAEL! THE LORD - YEHOVAH OUR GOD IS ONE';

John 5:44: How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another and you do not seek the glory that is from the one and only God?

John 17:3: This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus the Messiah whom you have sent.

1 Corinthians 8:6: yet for us there is {but} one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one lord, Jesus the Messiah, in whom are all things, and we exist through – because of him.

1 Timothy 2:5: For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Jesus the Messiah,

The Jews of Jesus time, and Jesus and Paul (from the scriptures above), thought God was one being; it was the bedrock of their faith. As Anthony Buzzard [& Charles Hunting] state in their book [1] The Doctrine of the Trinity – Christianity’s Self-Inflicted Wound: “Not once do we find Jesus criticizing his fellow countrymen for holding an inadequate understanding of the number of persons in the Godhead.”

If there is only one God (and according to the above mentioned scriptures there is only one), so who is this one God?

Let’s see what the Old Testament says:

NOTE: we must remember that when the Old Testament uses LORD in all capital letters, it is a place where the Tetragrammaton (YHVH - YEHOVAH) was used in the original.

As quoted earlier:

Deuteronomy 6:4: Hear, O Israel! YEHOVAH is  God, YEHOVAH is one!

Isaiah 45:5: I am YEHOVAH, and there is no other; besides me there is no God…

So YHVH (YEHOVAH) is the one true God. There are many, many examples from the Old Testament, but for the sake of space and time these two should suffice. They clearly say that YHVH (YEHOVAH) is the only God.

Let’s see what the New Testament says:

Mark 12:29:  Jesus answered, the foremost is, 'HEAR, O ISRAEL! THE LORD (YHVH - YEHOVAH) OUR GOD IS ONE)';

Since Jesus quotes Deuteronomy 6:4 in Mark it is clear that the one God – YHVH - YEHOVAH in the Old Testament is the same one God in the New Testament. As we have already quoted, Jesus said the following, in John, while praying to the Father:

John 17:3: This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus the Messiah whom you have sent.

And Paul says:

1 Corinthians 8:6: yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one Lord, Jesus the Messiah, because of whom are all things, and we exist because of him.

John and Paul in 1 Corinthians tell us who this one God – YHVH – YEHOVAH is; He is the Father. So, the Father in the New Testament is synonymous with YHVH - YEHOVAH in the Old Testament. Both Testaments say that YHVH - YEHOVAH, the Father, is the ONLY TRUE God.

Some will say “I thought Jesus was God the Son”? No, the Bible says Jesus is the Son of God and the Son of Man (“God the Son” is a term invented by men and is not found anywhere in the Bible). He is the Son of Man because His mother was Mary (human, mankind), and he is the Son of God because he was created in the womb of Mary by the spirit of God.

Notice: Luke 1:34-35: Then Mary said to the angel, “How shall this be, seeing I do not know man?”  And the angel answered, and said to her, “The Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow you. Therefore, that holy child which shall be born by you, shall be called the Son of God.

Granted, many beings are called god - elohim: Angels, OT judges, Moses, Jesus, Satan, etc, but not in the sense that John means it in the above passage. Did this make them co-equal with God? No!

Was the Messiah Jesus co-equal with God while on earth or was he subordinate to God while on earth? Most people would say he was subordinate simply because the evidence in scripture is overwhelming, but while many would say he was subordinate, a good portion of these would also add that “His human side was subordinate – not his God side”. Is this splitting of the Messiah’s nature into a “God” side and a “human” side Biblical - separating Jesus into two parts? The following scripture refutes such a notion:

1 John 4:2: By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus the Messiah has come in the flesh is from God;

An ancient text for 1 John 4:1-2 is reconstructed from Irenaeus (Ch. 16:8, ANF, Vol. 1, fn. p. 443); it gives a slightly different reading:

Hereby know you the spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses Jesus the Messiah came in the flesh is of God; and every spirit which separates Jesus the Messiah [from the flesh] is not of God but is of the antichrist.

Socrates the historian claims (VII, 32, p. 381) that this passage (from Irenaeus) is the true reading and that it became corrupted by those who wished to separate the humanity of Jesus the Messiah from his divinity.

Is this separation Biblical?

Let’s see what the scriptures say about Jesus position while on earth:

Matthew 20:23: …but to sit at my right hand, and at my left hand, is not mine to give. But it shall be given to those for whom it is prepared by my Father.

Matthew 26:39: ,… My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me; yet not as I will, but as you will.

Matthew 26:53-54: Or do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and He will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels. How then would the Scriptures be fulfilled which say that it must be so??

Mark 10:18: And Jesus said to him, why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.

Mark 13:32: But of that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. [Speaking about the day when God will send him down to take his place on the throne of David at Zion]

Mark 15:34: Jesus cried out with a loud voice… "MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?" A quote from Psalm 22 – read the whole Psalm to understand why Jesus cried out these words.

John 4:34: Jesus said to them, "My food is to do the will of Him who sent me and to accomplish His work. [It should be our food also]

John 5:19: … Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of himself, unless {it is} something he sees the Father doing…

John 5:20: For the Father loves the Son, and shows him all things that He Himself is doing…

John 5:22: For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son,

John 5:26: For just as the Father has life in Himself, even so He gave to the Son also to have life in himself;

John 5:30: I can do nothing on my own initiative. As I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just, because I do not seek my own will, but the will of Him who sent me.

John 5:36: But I have greater witness than the witness of John. For the works which the Father has given me to finish (the same works that I do) bear witness of me, that the Father sent me..

John 7:16: So Jesus answered them and said, my teaching is not mine, but His who sent ne.

John 7:28: Then Jesus cried out in the temple, teaching and saying, you both know me and know where I am from; and I have not come of myself, but He who sent me is true, whom you do not know.

John 8:26: …but He who sent me is true; and the things which I heard from Him, these I speak to the world.

John 8:28: …and I do nothing on my own initiative, but I speak these things as the Father taught me.[God teaches us through His word, the scriptures]

John 8:40: But as it is, you are seeking to kill me, a man who has told you the truth, which I heard from God. [Notice he doesn’t say “which I heard from the Father” – but “God]

John 8:54: Jesus answered, If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing; it is my Father who glorifies me, of whom you say, 'He is our God';

John 10:35-36: If he called them gods - Elohim, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), do you say of Him, whom the Father sanctified – set apart and sent into the world, 'You are blaspheming,' because I said, 'I am the Son of God'?

John 12:49: For I did not speak on my own initiative, but the Father Himself who sent me has given me a commandment {as to} what to say and what to speak.

John 14:10: Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own initiative, but the Father abiding in me does His works.

John 14:28: …If you loved me, you would have rejoiced because I go to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.

John 17:3: This is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus the Messiah whom you have sent. 

John 18:11: …the cup which the Father has given me, shall I not drink it?

So we see there is no hint of a “man side” and a “God side”. We should not try and make scripture fit our traditional doctrine, but we should make our teaching  fit what the word of God reveals, and not add to it or take away from it. It is interesting that the majority of texts come from John; the one gospel that Trinitarians and others like to use to prove Jesus is God.

Let us now look to see if the Messiah was subordinate to the Father after His resurrection and ascension:

1 Timothy 2:5: For there is one God, {and} one mediator also between God and men, {the} man Jesus the Messiah. Notice he’s still called a man after his resurrection and ascension.

1 Corinthians 8:6: yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we {exist} for Him; and one lord, Jesus the Messiah, because of whom are all things, and we {exist} in Him.

1 Corinthians 11:3: But I want you to understand that the Messiah is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of the Messiah.

1 Corinthians 15:24,28: then {comes} the end, when he hands over the kingdom to his God and Father - Yehovah, when he has abolished all rule and all authority and power. When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to him, so that God - Yehovah may be all in all.

Revelation 1:1: The Revelation of Jesus the Messiah, which God - Yehovah gave Him…

Thus far we have seen that there is only ONE TRUE GOD and that this one God is YHVH - YEHOVAH of the Old Testament and the Father of the New Testament. We have seen that Jesus was subordinate to this one God both while on earth and after his resurrection and ascension. If Jesus is not the ONE TRUE GOD, then what is He? Was Jesus a pre-existent being or an angel? If the Messiah was a pre-existent being above the angels, he could not have been eternal; for only God is eternal. If He has been here from sometime before the creation of the earth, then why do we never hear from him or about him in the Old Testament? Some would say that we do! They would counter that He was Michael the Archangel; others would say He was the Angel of YHVH - YEHOVAH. The chances of this are so remote that we won’t consider them in too much depth other than to quote a couple of scriptures:

Hebrews 1:1-2: God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son…

1 Peter 1:20: For He [Jesus] was foreknown before the foundation of the world, but has appeared in these last times for the sake of you. All those who are in the lord Messiah were also known from before the foundation o f the world – Ephesians 1:3-5:

Blessed be God, and the Father of our Lord, Jesus the Messiah, who has blessed us with all spiritual blessing in the Heavenly realms in the Messiah, as He has chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love; having marked us out beforehand to be adopted, through Jesus the Messiah, to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will… [All this according to the foreknowledge of our God and Father Yehovah]

When the Apostles in the New Testament go to such great lengths to explain to us who Jesus is, why do they not say he was the archangel, Michael? Why do they not say He was the Angel of YHVH - YEHOVAH? In the beginning the Apostles didn’t understand everything Jesus was telling them, but by the time they wrote the New Testament (which I’m sure most reading this believe is inspired) they had been endowed by the Holy Spirit.

What about passages that say Jesus created the world? Let’s look at them:

Ephesians 2:10: For we are His workmanship, created in the Messiah Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

Ephesians 3:9: and to bring to light what is the administration of the mystery which for ages has been hidden in God who created all things.

Colossians 1:12-20: giving thanks to the Father, what has qualified you to share in the inheritance of the saint in light. He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.  He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For in him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created in him and for him. And he is before all things [in the mind of God], and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent. For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.

Here the Greek word “en” occurs twice. The first time it is translated as “because of”, and the second time it is translated as “in”. The normal use of this Greek word is “in”. This word should be translated as “in” just as it is in Ephesians 2:10 and its second occurrence in Colossians 1:16 by the same translators. Here it is in the Revised Standard Version (RSV):

Colossians 1:16: for because of him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or authorities; all things were created because of him and for him.

The word that is translated as “through” in Colossians 1:16 is the Greek word “dia”. It can have the meaning of “because of” or “on account of”. Jesus is the reason for all of creation – both physical and spiritual. Many reputable Greek scholars such as J.H.Moulton in Grammar of New Testament Greek say that Colossians 1:16 should be rendered “for because of him”, and the Expositor’s Greek Commentary says on this verse: “en auto: This does not mean ‘by him’ ”. You’ll also notice that Colossians 1:16 does not say that the Messiah created the Heavens and the earth. It says, “in him all things were created, IN heaven and ON earth…”. It then goes on to tell us that these are thrones, dominions, principalities, and authorities. Christ was put over everything and given the authority to restructure the arrangements of spiritual powers and rankings.

I Peter 3:22: who is at the right hand of God, having gone into heaven, after angels and authorities and powers had been subjected to him.

Ephesians 1:21-22: far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. And He put all things in subjection under his feet, and gave him as head over all things to the church,

Colossians 2:10: …He is the head over all rule and authority;

Philippians 2:9-11: For this reason also, God highly exalted him, and bestowed on him the name which is above every name, so that AT THE NAME OF JESUS EVERY KNEE WILL BOW, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and that every tongue will confess that Jesus the Messiah is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Here are just a few scriptures that show God – YHVH – YEHOVAH created everything.

Genesis 1:1: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

Isaiah 42:5: Thus says YEHOVAH God, who created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread out the earth and its offspring, who gives breath to the people on it, and spirit to those who walk in it,

Isaiah 45:12: It is I who made the earth, and created man upon it. I stretched out the heavens with my hands And I ordained all their host.

Isaiah 45:18: For thus says YEHOVAH, who created the heavens (He is the God who formed the earth and made it, He established it {and} did not create it a waste place, {but} formed it to be inhabited), I am YEHOVAH, and there is none else.

Did Jesus pre-exist? The Old Testament type of Jesus  was “a lamb from among the flock”; one without spot or blemish. Jesus had to be one of us, not God masquerading as a man who was not really “tempted in every way as we are” and who could not really die, and not some Angel or pre-existent being.

As [2] J.A. Baker states:

“It simply is not possible at one and the same time to share the common lot of humanity and to be aware of oneself as one who has existed from everlasting with God”. And as stated in [3] “One God and One Lord – Reconsidering the Cornerstone of the Christian Faith”: …if Jesus were aware of being “God” in some way or could remember his former state of glory in heaven, then his experience of earthly life would be very different from ours. Consequently, our ability to identify with both his overcoming temptation and leaving us a righteous path to follow is seriously compromised. We are then essentially left without a “mediator”, but are being asked to be like God Himself, instead of developing absolute trust in God, our heavenly Father, as Jesus did, and becoming like him as he said we could and should.

Did He pre-exist in God’s mind as the Word – Logos – Reason – Plan for everything that would happen? Yes! Did God foreknow Jesus in a very real way? Yes, as he did all those who will be resurrected when he returns – See Ephesians 2.

1 Peter 1:20: For He was foreknown before the foundation of the world, but has appeared in these last times for the sake of you.

Here’s what Strong’s says the definition of the word “foreknown” (proginosko) is:
1) to have knowledge before hand
2) to foreknow

How do you foreknow someone who has always existed?
Did God foreknow us? Yes!

Romans 8:29: For those whom He foreknew, He also marked out beforehand {to become} conformed to the image of His Son, so that he would be the firstborn among many brethren;

Ephesians 1:4: just as He chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him. In love

2 Timothy 1:9: who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in the Messiah Jesus from all eternity,

God did foreknow us, but we did not pre-exist except in His heart and mind.

Did the Apostle John pre-exist?

John 1:6: There came a man sent from God, whose name was John.

We know the Apostle John did not pre-exist, but when we see this same type of wording (“sent from God”) applied to Jesus, some people somehow read pre-existence into it. 

2. Did/Does Jesus have a God?

Let’s see what the scriptures say:

Matthew 27:46: About the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, "ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACHTHANI?" that is, "MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?" (also in Mark 15:34, Psalm 22)

John 17:3: This is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus the Messiah whom you have sent.

John 20:17: Jesus said to her, "Stop clinging to Me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, 'I ascend to my Father and your Father, and my God and your God.' "

Some may say that Jesus made these comments in the flesh while on earth. Even though this is not a good argument – this splitting of the Messiah into two natures (as we have seen), this argument certainly doesn’t hold water for the remainder of these verses, which are after his Death, Burial, and Resurrection.

Romans 15:6: so that with one accord you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus the Messiah.

2 Corinthians 1:3: Blessed be the God and Father of our lord Jesus the Messiah, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort,

2 Corinthians 11:31: The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, he who is blessed forever, knows that I am not lying.

Ephesians 1:17: that the God of our lord Jesus the Messiah, the Father of glory, may give to you a spirit of wisdom and of revelation in the knowledge of him.

1 Peter 1:3: Blessed be the God and Father of our lord Jesus the Messiah, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus the Messiah from the dead,

Hebrews 1:9: "YOU HAVE LOVED RIGHTEOUSNESS AND HATED LAWLESSNESS; THEREFORE GOD, YOUR GOD, HAS ANOINTED YOU WITH THE OIL OF GLADNESS ABOVE YOUR COMPANIONS."

Revelation 1:1: The Revelation of Jesus the Messiah, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants - slaves, the things which must soon take place; and he sent and communicated {it} by His angel to His bond-servant - slave John,

Note: All those in the Messiah have been bought and paid for by his shed blood; sin-offering sacrifice and thus we are his slaves, subject to his authority as our master. As his slave we own nothing, but we have been given stewardship over all he blesses us with physically and spiritually. Since Jesus was acting as an agent of Yehovah we are also recognized as the slave of Yehovah, and we are to walk as slaves to righteousness.

Revelation 1:5-6: and from Jesus the Messiah, the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To him who loves us and released us from our sins by his blood [his sin-offering sacrifice]; and he has made us {to be} a kingdom, priests to his God and Father – Yehovah; to Him - Yehovah {be} the glory and the dominion forever and ever. Amen.

Revelation 3:12: He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God, and he will not go out from it anymore; and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from my God, and my new name.

Many Trinitarians subconsciously read the word “Father” in place of God when they see Jesus and God in juxtaposition; reading their own theology back into the scriptures.

3. Was He a Man?

Let’s see what the Old Testament says:

Deuteronomy 18:15: Yehovah your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear [obey],

Numbers 24:17-19: "I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near; A Star shall come out of Jacob; A Scepter shall rise out of Israel, and batter the brow of Moab, and destroy all the sons of tumult. And Edom shall be a possession; Seir also, his enemies, shall be a possession, while Israel does valiantly. Out of Jacob One shall have dominion and destroy the remains of the city."

2 Samuel 7:12-13: When your days are fulfilled and you rest with your fathers, I will set up your seed after you, who will come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.

Isaiah 11:1-3: There shall come forth a Rod from the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots. The Spirit of Yehovah shall rest upon Him, The Spirit of wisdom and understanding, The Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of Yehovah. His delight is in the fear of Yehovah,

Isaiah 49:1-8: "...YEHOVAH has called me [Jesus] from the womb; from the bowels of my mother [Mary] has he made mention of my name [Matthew 1:20-21, Luke 1:28-33]....in the shadow of His hand has He hid me...And now, says YEHOVAH that formed me from the womb to be His servant... to him whom man despised, to him whom the nation abhorred [referring to the Messiah Jesus]...have I [God] heard you...have I [God] helped you: and I [God] will preserve you [Jesus, the Messiah], and give you for a covenant [New Testament - Covenant]."

Jeremiah. 23:5: "Behold, the days are coming," says YEHOVAH, That I will raise to David a Branch of righteousness; A King shall reign and prosper, And execute judgment and righteousness in the earth.

The following verse in Daniel is a prophecy of the future ascension of Jesus to God’s right hand  to receive his dominion and glory. Daniel is seeing this vision from a Heavenly point of view; hence the “coming with the clouds of heaven” is actually a vision of Jesus’ coming to the Father after His resurrection ... Here He is called the Son of Man.

Daniel 7:13-14: I was watching in the night visions, and behold, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven! He came to the Ancient of Days, and they brought him near before Him. Then to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom the one which shall not be destroyed.

Zechariah 6:12-13: Then speak to him, saying, 'Thus says YEHOVAH of hosts, saying: "Behold, the man whose name is the BRANCH! From his place he shall branch out, and he shall build the temple of YEHOVAH; Yes, he shall build the temple of YEHOVAH. He shall bear the glory and shall sit and rule on his throne; So, He shall be a priest on his throne, And the counsel of peace shall be between them both." '

There are many more Messianic prophecies, but it is widely known that the Jews never expected anything other than a human Messiah. However, couldn’t the Jews have gotten it wrong (as they often did in Jesus’ time)? They may have gotten it wrong in their extra-biblical writings and musings, but not in the inspired Word of God. Some might say it was simply veiled in the Old Testament that the Messiah was actually going to be God himself and this wasn’t revealed until the New Testament; let’s take a look at the following passage in the Old Testament:

Psalm 110:1: YEHOVAH says to my lord: "Sit at My right hand Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet."

Let me again quote from Anthony Buzzard’s [& Charles Hunting's] book [1] The Doctrine of the Trinity – Christianity’s Self-Inflicted Wound.

It has been argued by some that this verse should be rendered ‘God said to my God…’ They insist that David knew of a duality in the Godhead and under inspiration declared the eternal Sonship and Deity of the one who was to become the man Jesus. Such a theory involves a misuse of the Hebrew language which can easily be cleared up. The two words for ‘lord’ in the sentence ‘the LORD said to my lord’ are significantly different. The first ‘LORD’ is Yehovah… [and] refers to God, the Father, the One God of Israel (as it does on some 6700 occasions). The second word for ‘lord’ (here, ‘my lord’) is adoni, meaning according to all standard Hebrew lexicons, ‘lord,’ ‘master,’ or ‘owner,’ and it refers here, by way of prediction, to the Messiah. If David had expected the Messiah to be God, the word used would not have been adoni, but adonai, a term used exclusively for the One God. Psalm 110:1 provides a major key to understanding who Jesus is. The Hebrew Bible carefully distinguishes the divine title adonai, the Supreme Lord, from adoni, the form of address appropriate to human and angelic superiors. Adoni, ‘my lord,’ ‘my master’ on no occasion refers to the deity. Adonai, on the other hand, is the special form of adon, Lord, reserved for address to the One God only. A reader of the Hebrew Bible is schooled to recognize the vital distinction between God and man. There is an enormous difference between adoni, ‘my master,’ and adonai, the Supreme God. No less than 195 times in the Hebrew canon adoni marks the person addressed as the recipient of honor but never as the Supreme God. This important fact tells us that the Hebrew Scriptures expected the Messiah to be not God, but the human descendant of David, whom David properly recognized would also be his lord. It is unusual for scholarly writing actually to misstate the facts about a word appearing in the Hebrew or Greek text. Astonishingly, however, a remarkable error crept into statements on high authority regarding the identity of the Messiah in this crucial Christological passage in Psalm 110:1. Notice now the evidence of widespread confusion in the treatment of this Psalm. The status of Jesus as the human adoni has proved to be an embarrassment to later ‘orthodoxy.’ A Roman Catholic writer, in an effort to support his traditional doctrine of the eternal Son, states: In Psalm 110:1 ‘Yahweh said to Adonai: Sit thou at my right hand.’ This passage is cited by the Messiah to prove that he is Adonai, seated at the right hand of Yahweh (Matthew 22:44). But Adonai ‘my master,’ as a proper name is used exclusively of the Deity, either alone or in such a phrase as Yehovah Adonai. It is clear, then that in this lyric Yehovah addresses the Messiah as a different Person and yet identical in Godhead. The information is incorrect. The second lord of the Hebrew text is specifically not adonai but adoni. The latter is never a divine title. The former always designates the Deity. The whole Trinitarian argument from this Psalm fails because the facts of the language are wrongly reported.

That pretty much says it all. The Old Testament seems pretty clear that the Messiah who was to come was going to be a true, flesh-and-blood, man.

Let’s see what the New Testament says:

Can God be tempted? Not according to James:

James 1:13: "God cannot be tempted with evil" Jesus was tempted…"

Luke 4:1-2: "And Jesus being full of the Holy Spirit returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, Being forty days tempted of the devil."

Luke 22:28: "You are they which have continued with me in my temptations."

Hebrews 2:18: "For in that he himself has suffered being tempted..."

Hebrews 4:15: "...but was in all points tempted like as we are..."

If his temptations weren’t real then he wasn’t “in all points tempted like as we are”. If there was no real possibility of Jesus giving in to these temptations, then they weren’t really temptations.

 Do any other New Testament scriptures say he was a man?

John 8:40: "But now you seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God..."

The rest of these verses are the Apostles speaking after Jesus’ resurrection.

Acts 2:22-24, 22: Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves also know him, being delivered by the determined purpose and foreknowledge of God, you have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death; whom God raised up, having loosed the pains of death, because it was not possible that he should be held by it.

Acts 2:36: "Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both lord and Messiah."

Acts 3:22: "For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall Yehovah your God raise up unto you of your brethren..."

Acts 13:23: "Of this man's seed (David's) has God according to his promise raised unto Israel a Savior, Jesus:"

Romans 5:19: "For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one (one man, Jesus the Messiah, verse 15) shall many be made righteous."

1 Corinthians 15:21-23: "For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam (a man) all die, even so in Christ (a man) shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: The Messiah the first fruits; afterward..."

1 Timothy 2:5: "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man the Messiah Jesus;"

The above verse in 1 Timothy should be clear enough. Notice it does not say “one mediator between ‘the Father’ and men”, but “between God and men, the man the Messiah Jesus”. If Jesus were God, this scripture wouldn’t make any sense.

Hebrews 1:4: having become so much better than the angels, as He has by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.

Hebrews 1:11-12: For both he who sanctifies [sets apart] and those who are being sanctified are all of one, for which reason he is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying: "I will declare your name to my brethren; In the midst of the assembly I will sing praise to you."

Hebrews 5:7-9: when he had offered up prayers and supplications, with vehement cries and tears to Him who was able to save him from death, and was heard because of his godly fear, though he was a Son, yet he learned obedience by the things which He suffered. And having been perfected, he became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey him,

Hebrews 7:14: For it is evident that our lord was descended from Judah, a tribe with reference to which Moses spoke nothing concerning priests.

Revelation 5:5: and one of the elders said to me, "Stop weeping; behold, the lion that is from the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has overcome so as to open the book and its seven seals."

For the Messiah to truly come from the tribe of Judah, he had to be of Mary’s egg. Not an angel put in her womb and not God Himself entering Mary’s womb, but an actual baby conceived in her womb from her egg (not from Joseph, but from God by the power of His Spirit – virgin birth). The KJV uses the words “sprang out of Juda” in Hebrews 7:14. The Greek word is “anatello” and means “rise – to cause to rise – of the earth bringing forth plants – etc.”

Luke records the conversation between the Angel and Mary in this way:

Luke 1:35: The angel answered and said to her, The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy child shall be called the Son of God.

The Greek word here translated as “for that reason” (therefore in the KJV) is dio, and it means “wherefore; on account of”. The reason Jesus would be called the Son of God was because the Power of the Most High God was going to overshadow Mary and she would conceive, and for that reason, or on account of this, he would be called the Son of God. Just as Adam, who was created by God is called the son of God – Luke 3:38: the son of Enos, the sone of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.


We have seen that Jesus was a man, a mediator between God and man; we are to be like the Messiah – heirs with him; God is our Father and the Messiah is our elder brother:

Acts 3:22: Moses said: YEHOVAH GOD WILL RAISE UP FOR YOU A PROPHET LIKE ME FROM YOUR BRETHREN; TO HIM YOU SHALL GIVE HEED TO EVERYTHING HE SAYS TO YOU.

Romans 8:17: and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with the Messiah, if indeed we suffer with him} so that we may also be glorified with him.

Romans 8:29: For those whom He foreknew, He also marked out beforehand to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that he would be the firstborn among many brethren;

Hebrews 2:11-12: For both he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all from one {Father;} for which reason he is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, "I WILL PROCLAIM YOUR NAME TO MY BRETHREN, IN THE MIDST OF THE CONGREGATION I WILL SING YOUR PRAISE."

This should have thoroughly proven that the Messiah Jesus was a man; not a half man, not sort-of-a-man, not possessing a man’s body, not God masquerading as a man, but a real flesh-and-blood man. There is nothing to make us think he is one-third of a triune being. He is not co-equal and co-eternal with the Father. He is the Son of Man, the Son of God – He is our lord and Savior.

1 Corinthians 8:6: "But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one lord Jesus the Messiah, because of  whom are all things, and we in him."

Philippians 2:11: and that every tongue will confess that Jesus the Messiah is lord, to the glory of God the Father. 

4. Why a Man?

First of all when man sinned God required that blood be shed [a sin-offering sacrifice] to pay for those sins.

Genesis 9:4-6: But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood. Surely for your lifeblood I will demand a reckoning; from the hand of every beast, I will require it, and from the hand of man. From the hand of every man's brother I will require the life of man. Whoever sheds man's blood, by man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man.

Blood had to be shed; without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins:

Hebrews 9:22: without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.

But God cannot shed blood; He is not flesh and blood.

Matthew 16:17: And Jesus said to him, Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal {this} to you, but My Father who is in heaven.

Because blood is required, God set up the whole sacrificial system, but it was only a shadow or type pointing to the Messiah. This is the reason that the animal sacrifices in the Old Testament did not truly atone for sins.

Hebrews 10:4: For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins.

Man sinned, so man’s blood is required. Again, God’s blood is not required – God is not a man and He cannot die.

Numbers 23:19: God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should repent.

By looking at Adam Christology we can see another reason Jesus had to be a true man (another Adam). The first Adam messed things up and the second Adam came to fix them.

1 Corinthians 15:45: So also it is written, "The first MAN, Adam, BECAME A LIVING SOUL." The last Adam {became} a life-giving spirit – as a glorified, immortal man.

Romans 5:14-19: Nevertheless, death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of him who was to come. But the free gift is not like the offense. For if by the one man's offense many died, much more the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus the Messiah, abounded to many. And the gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned. For the judgment which came from one offense resulted in condemnation, but the free gift which came from many offenses resulted in justification – a decree of not guilty. For if by the one man's offense death reigned through the one, much more those who receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One [man], Jesus the Messiah.) Therefore, as through one man's offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man's righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life – guilt free. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man's obedience many will be made righteous.

1 Corinthians 15:21-22: For since by man came death, by man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in the Messiah all shall be made alive.

Do you see the pattern emerging here? Man sinned so man has to pay for those sins. Therefore God, in his amazing foreknowledge and grace, had a contingency plan from before the foundation of the world. He would have a man be born in the fullness of time. God’s Spirit would overshadow Mary and she would conceive and give birth to the Messiah who would pay for man’s sins.

The first Adam was called the Son of God because he was made by God; he was a true man, made by God

Luke 3:38: the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.

Therefore, the second Adam had to be a true man, made by God. God created man (Adam) who had the capability of sinning (human nature), but not a propensity toward it (sin nature). He made him genetically perfect and hoped he would be behaviorally perfect. Once he disobeyed and ate of the forbidden fruit, sin nature entered the picture. The birth of our Savior was from God impregnating Mary, creating another genetically perfect man and hoping he would be behaviorally perfect. God was responsible for the flawless genetics, but he could not be responsible for the flawless behavior. Man is a free will being and as such must choose to obey or disobey. The first Adam chose to disobey; the second Adam was obedient in every way, enabled by the Spirit of God – God indwelled him with the fulness of his nature. We again quote from [3] “One God and One lord – Reconsidering the Cornerstone of the Christian Faith”:

The Bible is basically a story about two Adams and the two “races” they fathered. Romans 5:12-21 could be summarized like this:

Two Adams
Two Sons of God
Two men
Two gardens
Two temptations
Two decisions
Two results
Two races
 

Remember this?

Hebrews 4:15: "...but was in all points tempted like as we are..."

Can we really say he was “tempted like as we are” if he existed from eternity past, had a knowledge of this existence, and knew he would return to being God himself? I quote [4] J.A.T. Robinson:

The traditional supernaturalistic way of describing the Incarnation almost inevitably suggests that Jesus was really God Almighty walking about on earth, dressed up as a man. Jesus was not a man born and bred – he was God for a limited period taking part in a charade. He looked like a man, he talked like a man, he felt like a man, but underneath he was God dressed up – like Father Christmas…Indeed, the very word “incarnation” (which, of course is not a Biblical term) almost inevitably suggests it. It conjures up the idea of a divine substance being plunged in flesh and coated with it like a chocolate or silver plating…The supernaturalistic view of the Incarnation can never really rid itself of the idea of the prince who appears in the guise of a beggar. However genuinely destitute the beggar may be, he is a prince; and that in the end is what matters.

IF it is a requirement that we believe in a Trinitarian God, a Binetian God, or a God Family; if it is a requirement that we believe Jesus was anything other than the Son of God; why didn’t Peter mention it when he preached this sermon to Jews (who were extremely Monotheistic and had no conception of the Trinity) in Acts chapter 2 right after he had received the promised Holy Spirit (which should have led him into all truth)?

Acts 2:22-42: Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves also know him, being delivered by the determined purpose and foreknowledge of God, you have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death; whom God raised up, having loosed the pains of death, because it was not possible that he should be held by it. For David says concerning him: 'I foresaw the lord always before my face, for he is at my right hand, that I may not be shaken. Therefore, my heart rejoiced, and my tongue was glad; moreover, my flesh also will rest in hope. For You will not leave my soul in Hades, nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption. You have made known to me the ways of life; you will make me full of joy in your presence.' Men and brethren, let me speak freely to you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. Therefore, being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that of the fruit of his body, according to the flesh, He would raise up the Messiah to sit on his throne, he, foreseeing this, spoke concerning the resurrection of the Messiah, that His soul was not left in Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses. Therefore, being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he poured out this which you now see and hear. For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself: 'The Lord said to my lord, "Sit at My right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool." ' "Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both lord and Messiah. "Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, "Men and brethren, what shall we do?" Then Peter said to them, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus the Messiah for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call." And with many other words he testified and exhorted them, saying, "Be saved from this perverse generation." Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them. And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers.

As stated earlier, these people listening to Peter were Jews  from all over the known world (Roman Empire),and were of the Jewish religion and were in Jerusalem for the feast of Pentecost. The Jewish religion had no concept of a Trinity. These 3000 people could not have had any concept that Jesus was God himself, yet 3000 people were saved and baptized that day! Amazing isn’t it!

It is amazing how the Jews were disingenuously trying to drum up charges against Jesus. At one point they say the following:

John 8:41: "You are doing the deeds of your father." They said to Him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father: God."

And then at another point they say Jesus was making himself equal with God because He said that God was His Father:

John 5:18: "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God."

They were speaking out of both sides of their mouth – anything to try and trap Him.

5. Conclusion

Let us not destroy the historical lord, Jesus the Messiah by making him an eternal, pre-existent, omnipotent, untemptable, co-equal God who masqueraded as a man for a short time. He was a man in whom God dwelt, and through whom God spoke and worked and manifested Himself; a man who’s Father was God; a man who submitted to God - "Not my will, but your, be done" (Luke 22:42). The doctrine of the Trinity is not scriptural. The idea of 3 co-equal, co-eternal members of a Godhead is not to be found anywhere in the scripture; to quote Anthony Buzzard [& Charles Hunting] one last time from [their] book [1]

 The Doctrine of the Trinity – Christianity’s Self-Inflicted Wound:

“Could it be that today’s Trinitarians inadvertently, and in sincerity desiring to exalt Jesus, fall into the trap of ascribing to the Messiah a position as God which he never claimed for himself? A claim to be Deity in the Trinitarian sense would actually be blasphemous by Jesus’ own standards, since he repeatedly affirmed that his Father was the only true God."


Footnotes

1.    This book by Sir Anthony Buzzard & Charles Hunting can be purchased by logging on to http://www.abc-coggc.org/coggc/books.htm.

 

2.     This quote is from the book, ‘The Use of the Fourth Gospel for Christology Today’, by J.A. Baker

 

3.    To read excerpts from this book or to purchase, log on to: http://www.biblicalunitarian.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=47

 

4.     This quote is from the book, “Honest to God” pg. 65-66

Written by a man who goes by the name of “Seeker” on the web, and edited by Bruce Lyon

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

ISAIAH 53

Isaiah 53, prophesies God’s shocking plan to send his Servant to present himself as a sin-offering sacrifice, shedding his blood and dying so that humanity would be reconciled to his God and Father Yehovah, and open the door for their sins to be forgiven. Isaiah 53:6-7:

We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to our own way; and the LORD - Yehovah has laid on him the iniquity of us all. He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep, before its shearers are silent, so he did not open his mouth.

Here we feel the painful imagery of the Lamb of God who willingly suffers for the sins of the sheep who have gone astray. Just a few lines later, though, Isaiah joyously predicts the Messiah’s victory over death and ultimate redemption of sinners:

After he has suffered, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge, my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities. Assuredly, I will give him the many as his portion, He shall receive the multitude as his spoil., because he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors. For he bore the sin of many and made intercession for the transgressors. (Isaiah 53:11-12)

Notice: Psalm 2:6,8: I have installed my king on Zion, my holy mountain…. Ask me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession.

Psalm 2 is a messianic prophecy in which God announces that he has anointed his true King, His anointed one, the Messiah. As God’s – Yehovah’s king is appointed to reign, he is “given” the nations as a gift. The people aren’t just his subjects, they are his “possession.”

A King Who Suffers for his Kingdom

What a strange place to find this imagery. The victorious messiah of Psalm 2 seems to be the utter opposite of the suffering servant in Isaiah 53. if you read Isaiah 53:12 as being about God’s – Yehovah’s Servant being “given the multitudes,” these two messianic visions become one. First, the Servant suffers to redeem his people, and Second, he is proclaimed God’s true Messiah - King. The multitudes that he is given are the people whose sins he atoned for. In effect, he’s “purchased” them, they are bought and paid for by the blood he shed when he offered up himself to his God and Father Yehovah as a sin-offering sacrifice. It is because of the Messiah’s suffering that he is given rulership over the kingdom of God!

As much as it may chafe our modern ears to be called “slaves,” Jesus’ death on the cross did not just pay for our sins, it purchased our very lives,  we are his slaves and as such have become slaves of righteousness. If we’ve received him as our Savior and Lord, we place ourselves under his kingship as his slaves. We are his, we’re not our own. A slave obeys the words of his master and as such we obey the word that God - Yehovah gave to Jesus to give to us to follow and obey!

What does this mean for how we live?

This year as you celebrate the Messiah’s resurrection during the Feast of Passover, remind yourself of the glorious scene in Revelation when the “Lamb” of Isaiah 53 finally takes his throne:

Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain, standing at the center of the throne, encircled by the four living creatures and the elders. They sang a new song, saying,

“You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased for God persons from every tribe and language and people and nation. You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God and they will reign on the earth!”

Then I looked and heard the voice of many angels, numbering thousands upon thousands, and ten thousand times ten thousand. … In a loud voice they were saying:

“Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and praise!”  (Revelation 5:6, 9-12)

LIVING WATER

One prominent image that recurs from Genesis to Revelation is that of living water. In the Middle East, water is scarce and precious, and very much needed for survival. Only a few months of the year does rain fall in Israel and the rest of the time the ancient peoples survived on stagnant water that was stored in cisterns in the ground. When rain does fall after many months of clear blue skies, it seems to be a miraculous gift from God – Yehovah.

The difference with or without rain in Israel is amazing – the hills can be barren and brown much of the year but after a season of rain, covered in green meadows and flowers. Where there are rivers, lush vegetation surrounds them, while only yards away, all is barren.

Out of this arose the idea of living water, or mayim chaim (MY-eem KHY-eem), which refers to water in the form of rain or flowing from a natural spring, which has come directly from God, not carried by human hands or stored in cisterns. It also is a contrast to seawater, especially that of the Dead Sea, which looks refreshing but is poisonous, and makes the land around it barren.

Living water was strongly associated with the presence of God. Many times, in the scriptures, God - Yehovah is called the source of living water.

From Eden, where God - Yehovah dwells with man, a river welled up that formed the headwaters of four mighty rivers. (Genesis 2:10).

Psalm 29:10 pictures God - Yehovah sitting “enthroned over the flood.”

In Revelation, the river of life flows out from under the throne of God - Yehovah (Revelation 22:1).

In Jeremiah 17:13 it says:

O Yehovah, the hope of Israel, all who forsake you will be put to shame. Those who turn away from you will be written in the dust because they have forsaken Yehovah, the spring of living water.

Water in Israel and Egypt

One lesson that the ancient Hebrews would have learned about God’s – Yehovah’s ways came from the contrast in the water sources of Egypt and Israel. In Deuteronomy 11:10-12. it says:

The land you are entering to take over is not like the land of Egypt, from which you have come, where you planted your seed and irrigated it by foot as in a vegetable garden. But the land you are crossing the Jordan to take possession of is a land of mountains and valleys that drink rain from heaven. It is a land Yehovah your God cares for; the eyes of Yehovah your God are continually on it from the beginning of the year to its end.

The difference between Egypt and the promised land of Canaan was that in Egypt almost no rain fell, and crops were entirely irrigated by the flooding the Nile and by the labor of hand-watering, while in Canaan the land was entirely watered by rain from God. While Egypt didn’t feel the presence of God - Yehovah through rain, it achieved its secure food source through human effort. Egypt and Canaan, therefore, were a contrast of security of human effort compared to dependence on God - Yehovah. The Egyptians were aware of the difference between their land and others.

In Genesis, we hear that Abraham and Isaac are forced to go to Egypt several times when a drought overtakes Canaan, and of course, during Joseph’s time, that is what brings the entire family to Egypt to survive.

There was a spiritual lesson for the Israelites when they left the land of Egypt for the promised land of Canaan; when God - Yehovah chose a land for His people, He didn’t choose a place where they could have security because of their own efforts, He chose a land where they would be far more dependent on Him and would need His presence watching over them to send them the living water of rain.

Many Christians have seen God - Yehovah do the same thing in their own lives when they step out to follow Him and He takes them from the security of their own effort and brings them to a point of dependence on Him, which doesn’t always include prosperity as the world sees it. In like manner, even though Israel is the “Promised Land,” in many places the land is not nearly as lush as Egypt. It is interesting that God - Yehovah often desires dependence from His people rather than abundance

Living Water as the Holy Spirit

For the Israelites, the presence of rain in Israel was very much associated with a blessing by God - Yehovah, and its absence with His disapproval. Almost every prophet decreed that drought would come as a punishment for their sins. But God’s – Yehovah’s redemption was likened to Him sending abundant rain, giving them living water to drink:

Then will the eyes of the blind be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped. Then will the lame leap like a deer, and the mute tongue shout for joy. Water will gush forth in the wilderness and streams in the desert. The burning sand will become a pool, the thirsty ground bubbling springs. (Isaiah 35:5-7)

Because living water came directly from God - Yehovah, it was closely associated with God’s – Yehovah’s Spirit in the world. When God – Yehovah promised to redeem His people, He promised to send His Spirit:

For I will pour out water on the thirsty land, and streams on the dry ground; I will pour out My Spirit on your offspring and My blessing on your descendants; and they will spring up among the grass like poplars by streams of water. (Isaiah 44:3 – 4)

In Joel 2:23, 27-29, the outpouring of God’s – Yehovah’s Spirit in the last days is closely associated with living water:

Be glad, O people of Zion, rejoice in Yehovah your God, for he has given you the autumn rains in righteousness. He sends you abundant showers, both autumn and spring rains, as before… Then you will know that I am in Israel, that I am Yehovah your God, and that there is no other; never again will my people be ashamed. And afterward, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, and your young men will see visions. Even on my servants, both men and women, I will pour out my Spirit in those days.

This image of living water is therefore an important feature of the ministry of Jesus. In the book of John, he explains that he is the one who truly brings living water into the world. He says to the Samaritan woman:

Everyone who drinks of this water [from a well] will thirst again, but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst, but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life. (John 4:13-14)

And later, during the feast of Sukkot, on the last and greatest day, when the prayers of Israel were an impassioned plea for God - Yehovah to bless them with rain, Jesus stood up and shouted, saying:

“If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink! He who believes in me, as the Scripture said, ‘From his innermost being will flow rivers of living water.'” But this he spoke of the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive; for the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified. (John 7:37 – 39)

Living water is also understood to mean a true knowledge of God - Yehovah. Certainly, this is associated with the Holy Spirit, who teaches us God’s – Yehovah’s will and guides and directs us. Certainly, it is associated with Jesus’ ministry of revealing God’s – Yehovah’s true character by Jesus’ sacrificial love for us. It is in contrast with that of “brackish water” like that of the Dead Sea, which is a false knowledge of God, that false prophets and twisted doctrines yield. Although it looks fine to the eye, it is quite poisonous!

And, in Hebrew, the word for knowledge, “da’at,” carries the connotation of intimacy and care, as when we know a person, we care for them. So, living water as knowledge of God - Yehovah really means an intimate relationship with him, which is what the Spirit of God - Yehovah gives us.

In Ezekiel 47, there is a wonderful picture of living water. The prophet Ezekiel is at the Temple and sees a little trickle of water flowing out from under the altar. The water flows out of the Temple down the south stairs. A thousand cubits from the Temple, the strange flow of water has grown ankle-deep, and a thousand more cubits it is knee-deep, and a thousand more it is waist deep, and finally it becomes a stream so deep and wide that it can’t be crossed. This paradoxical river does a strange thing; it increases as it flows away from its source. How can that be?

Moreover, this little stream from the Temple is flowing southeast out of Jerusalem toward the Dead Sea, twelve miles away. The land to the east of Jerusalem is arid, and the area near the Dead Sea is a poisoned salt wasteland where absolutely nothing can live. But this stream has a marvelous effect:

On the bank of the river, there were many trees on one side and on the other. Then he said to me: “These waters go out toward the eastern region and go down into the Arabah; then they go toward the sea, being made to flow into the sea, and the waters of the sea become fresh. “It will come about that every living creature which swarms in every place where the river goes, will live. And there will be very many fish, for these waters go there and the others become fresh; so, everything will live where the river goes. “

And it will come about that fishermen will stand beside it; from En-Gedi to En-Eglaim there will be a place for the spreading of nets. Their fish will be according to their kinds, like the fish of the Great Sea, a lot. “But its swamps and marshes will not become fresh; they will be left for salt. “By the river on its bank, on one side and on the other, will grow all kinds of trees for food. Their leaves will not wither, and their fruit will not fail. They will bear every month because their water flows from the sanctuary, and their fruit will be for food and their leaves for healing.” (Ezekiel 47:7-12)

It is beautiful to see how the image of this river of life flowing from the Temple in Ezekiel 47 describes the outpouring of the Spirit that occurred at Pentecost. Of course, the Spirit first fell on the people in the Temple as they were worshiping there, as tongues of flame settled on them. It was as if the Spirit started trickling out of the sanctuary to that little “puddle” of believers.

Interestingly, when Peter preached to the people at the Temple at Pentecost, he was probably standing on the south stairs, where the water in Ezekiel’s vision flowed! That is a large public gathering place where the worshippers entered the Temple, a common site of public teaching. Also on the south stairs are the mikvehs (ceremonial baths), where 3000 people that day were baptized in living water. They have been excavated and are visible even today.

The trickle of God’s – Yehovah’s Spirit became ankle-deep as the first believers shared the gospel and many in the city believed, and then knee-deep as they carried the gospel to the surrounding countries. Instead of running out of energy as it flowed, the river of God’s – Yehovah’s Spirit got deeper and wider as it flowed! And its ultimate destination is that of the most desolate of wastelands, full of the poisonous, brackish water of the Dead Sea. This is the dark reality of a world devoid of a true knowledge of God - Yehovah. Anywhere it touches it gives new life and an intimate relationship with God - Yehovah where there was only death before.

We were all the more touched by the fact that one of the places where this river of life flows is En-Gedi, the image we chose for our name. We knew that En-Gedi is an oasis full of waterfalls that show the image of living water. But only after studying this passage did, we realize that En-Gedi is fed by waters that come down from the mountain of Jerusalem and are right at the edge of this “River of Life” of God’s – Yehovah’s Holy Spirit that He is pouring out on the world.

What is God’s – Yehovah’s final plan for this river that gets deeper and wider as it flows?

The earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of Yehovah as the waters cover the sea. (Habakkuk. 2:14, Isaiah 11:9) 

LOST IN TRANSLATION: THE S/spirit

Are Modern Bible Versions Misleading Millions? Sadly, we have had to answer in the affirmative. In this final LOST IN TRANSLATION article, we highlight another area where we will again arrive at the maxim that translation is the subtlest form of commentary. This time, we look at “the Holy Spirit”.

Readers may be surprised to learn that the actual phrase “holy spirit” occurs only twice in the Old Testament (OT)! The first is in Psalm 51:11. It’s after the prophet Nathan exposed King David’s sin with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband Uriah. In anguish of soul David pleads with Yahweh; Do not cast me away from Your presence, and do not take Your holy spirit from me (Psalm 51: 11 NRSV).

The only other place where the phrase “holy spirit” is found in the OT is in Isaiah 63:11-12: Where is He who put His holy spirit within them, who led them by the right hand of Moses? Both verses describe the “holy spirit” as belonging to Yehovah God.

The “holy spirit” is Your holy spirit and His holy spirit; the spirit possessed by God - Yehovah. Both verses use the literary style called Hebrew parallelism and connect God’s holy spirit with His presence and leading.

The New Testament (NT) by way of contrast, uses the phrase holy spirit 87 times! (Nearly always our Bible versions capitalize it; Holy Spirit.) What’s going on here? Doesn’t the OT know much at all about the ‘Christian’ doctrine of the person of the Holy Spirit? How is it that ‘He’ suddenly and ubiquitously appears in the NT as the Biblical data would suggest?

OLD TESTAMENT BACKGROUND FIRST

The first mention of the word ‘S/spirit’ (ruach) is in Genesis 1:2 where we read, And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. Again, we note it’s God’s spirit, the Spirit of God. Most Bible versions capitalize the Spirit in Genesis 1: 2 but some don’t (e.g. ESV, Douay-Rheims, JPS Tanakh 1917). The word ruach is a feminine noun.

Hebrew Lexicons are in unanimous agreement that the basic idea behind ruach is that of the breath in the nostrils, with the cognate idea of air or wind in motion. So, while S/spirit is a reasonable translation, it’s not the only possible translation, nor even necessarily the best translation.

Some translate this verse as a Hebrew reader naturally would. The NRSV has it that a wind (ruach) from God swept over the face of the waters. Others read the breath (ruach) of God (Holy Bible in Modern English), a mighty wind (NAB), a divine wind (New Jerusalem Bible), an awesome wind, or even the power of God (TEV footnotes) swept over the waters. The essential meaning of Genesis 1:2 then, is that the ruach of, or from, God is associated with His creative breath/activity. Creation arises out of God’s operational presence and superintendence over our world. Translator convention has been to capitalize “Spirit” for the obvious reason that it’s from God Himself.

 

Here in this first mention of the ruach of God - Yehovah, we are told that His Spirit moved, hovered or fluttered over the waters. This is a Hebrew metaphor that likens the Spirit or Breath of God to a brooding hen or to a bird hovering in flight. The idea is that the ruach of God is His personal and operational power in creation. (Cf the Spirit’s descent in the form of a dove upon Jesus at his baptism.) Later, God breathed into Adam’s nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul-being (Genesis 2:7). Adam, as it were, inhaled life-giving sacred breath, holy Spirit from his Creator. Therefore, Adam received “God-consciousness” as well as “soul” or “self-consciousness”. Thus, as a living soul, Adam enjoyed the fellowship of God as well as interacting with all the physical sensations of the world around him. This idea is expressed well when Job knew that, as long as my breath (ruach) is in me, and the Breath / Spirit (ruach) from God in my nostrils, then I will plead my cause (Job 27:3)

We understand then that the root meaning of the word ruach / spirit/wind/breath in the OT denotes the creative and powerful life energy that emanates from God Himself towards His creation. Thus, when David pleads with Yehovah: Do not cast me away from Your presence, and do not take your holy spirit from me he is asking for at least two or three things. In the anguish of his wickedness, he has lost all sense of fellowship with God. He wants the joy of his salvation restored. He wants to once again know the conscious presence of God. He has also lost all sense of the power of God in his life necessary for him to perform his kingly calling, so he is probably also asking that God not disqualify him from being the “Yehvoah’s anointed”; as had previously happened with King Saul’s elimination. And thirdly, I think, he is perhaps so depressed and physically sick by guilt, that he feels he might die. So, he may also be asking for God not to take away his very life’s breath in death. (Cf Psalm 31:10; 102:1ff)

THE SPIRIT AND INSPIRATIONAL TRUTH

Whilst I am breathing, I have life, I am moving, I can speak, I have “spirit”! By extension, we understand that ruach came to refer to certain human emotions. Just as the air may be felt in quiet breathing, in a gentle breeze, or in a cyclonic wind, so a man’s “spirit” may be peaceable or violently angry; as seen in gentle, grieved, broken, or agitated emotions.

No wonder then, that the Hebrews regularly connected the Ruach Yahweh with the interchangeable concepts of S/spirit/air/breath/wind/word/truth and the like …To whom have you uttered words? And whose spirit (ruach, breath) was expressed

through you (Job 26:4). Words/spirit/breath/speech. For as long as life (ruach, breath) is in me, and the breath (ruach, spirit) of God is in my nostrils, my lips certainly will not speak unjustly (Job 27:3-4). Breath/spirit/words/speech. But it is a spirit (ruach) in man, and the breath (ruach) of the Almighty that gives them understanding (teaching Job 32:8). Spirit/breath/understanding. The Spirit (ruach) of Yehovah spoke by me, and His word was on my tongue (2 Samuel 23:2). Spirit/word/speech. Behold, I will pour out my spirit (ruach) on you; I will make my words known to you (Proverbs 1:23). Spirit/words/knowledge. The grass withers, the flower fades, when the breath (ruach) of Yehovah blows upon it … the grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever (Isaiah 40:7-8). Spirit/breath/wind/word.

Now we understand why, when the Spirit of Yehovah came upon the prophets, they inevitably were moved to speak Yahweh’s words … For prophecy did not come by the will of men, but by men who were pushed along by the holy Spirit (breath/wind) spoke from God … (2 Peter 1:21) (My translation). God’s mind/breath became their inspirational words! It is also said of Jesus that he was speaking the words of God, for God does not give [him] the Spirit (Greek = πνεῦμα / pneuma) by measure (John 3:34). The OT prophets spoke in limited portions by the motivational breath of God, but at last the Son speaks with final and complete truth, for God carries him along in the unlimited gives supply of His Spirit (cf Hebrews 1:1)!

Ruach can mean a powerful, or even violent movement, resulting from the “breath” or “wind” of Yahweh in motion. When ‘the Spirit of Yahweh’ came upon an individual, he or she rose up to accomplish some important deed, if not a supernatural feat (e.g. Judges 14:6).

PERSONIFICATION

The Hebrews were certainly not unaware that God’s breath or Spirit was mysterious in its operations. Jesus himself said, the wind (pneuma) blows where it chooses and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes (John 3:8). That’s Jewish thinking! The wind is likened to a person who can choose 2 Cf. 2 Timothy 3:16 where the holy Scriptures are said to have been given by the inspiration of God. God expired His word (His breath) and the prophets inspired (breathed in) His spiritual words and wrote them down and His Spirit comes or goes as He pleases. All we can do is listen and watch which way it goes by its effects.

However, the line between metaphor and personification became a problem for the post-apostolic churches when thinking about the Spirit of God. Kagan Chandler explains how the process happened: In the New Testament, because the Holy Spirit is a personal influence, the literary technique of personification is sometimes employed in its description. The Spirit speaks (John 16:13), teaches (John 14:26), can be outraged (Hebrews 10:29), can be blasphemed against (Matthew 12:32), can be lied to (Acts 5:4), and intercedes (Romans 8:26). But trinitarian apologists have chosen these personifications as their prime battlefield, and most arguments follow this line of reasoning:

“And do not grieve the Holy Spirit” is Paul’s instruction to the Ephesian believers (Ephesians 4:30). If the Holy Spirit were simply a power or a force, and not a person, he could not be grieved. What they are really arguing is that because the Holy Spirit is presented as a thing both distinct from God and Jesus, and sometimes in personal terms, it must be a separate person who is not the Father or Jesus.

The truth is that other persons’ spirits are described in the Bible using the literary technique of personification, and no distinct person is implied. For example, in the OT we read: But he would not grieve the spirit of Amnon his son, for he loved him … (2 Samuel 13:21) Well might we ask; Is Amnon’s spirit another person? Not at all. As Chandler rightly observes, this kind of language is simply a Hebrew idiom. Another OT example will suffice to prove the point. In 2 Samuel 13:39, we are told that the spirit of the king longed to go out to Absolom. David wished to personally comfort his son! There is no thought that the spirit of the king is a second David. Grieving and longing are the same examples provided by Trinitarians as absolute proof that God’s spirit must be a distinct person. But the spirit of Elijah is not a separate person from Elijah (Cf 2 Kings 2:15; Luke 1:17). Neither is the spirit of the Father. It is simply not a biblical argument that stands up under scrutiny.

These examples prove that when modern-day Bible versions propose the Holy Spirit is a separate Person from God the Father, they are haphazard, to say the least, and just peddling plain disinformation at the worst! Greek thinking has transposed Hebrew personification into literal personhood.

THE GOD OF JESUS

In Light of Christian Dogma: The Recovery of New Testament Theology, Restoration Fellowship, 2016, pp 507 -509. (Boldface mine).

GRAMMATICAL GENDER: IS THE ‘HOLY SPIRIT’ HE OR IT, WHO OR WHICH?

An astute reader may still observe, ‘But my Bible calls the Holy Spirit “He”. What do you say to that?” Once again, this is a matter of proper translation. It comes down in large part to what we call “grammatical gender”. In the Greek language, some nouns are ‘masculine’, some are ‘feminine’ and some are ‘neuter’. Personal pronouns referring to their nouns must be in the same grammatical gender and case. So, the pronoun “she” may describe a biological person or an impersonal thing. For example, the Greek word for “road” is grammatically feminine, so the pronoun “she” is used; the road, she is long. Calling a road “she” does not mean the road is a person! (There are vestiges of this practice in English, for example, when sailors speak of a beautiful ship as “she” … “Isn’t she beautiful!?” … when all along they are speaking of an “it”!).

So, gendered pronouns do not necessarily describe biological gender. This is a crucial translation matter for, in Greek, a noun in the neuter always describes something impersonal: an object, a force, an abstract principle, any thing. Putting that the other way around, a neuter noun is never a “he’ or a ‘she’! All we need to know for this exercise is that, in Greek, ‘neuter nouns’ are used only for impersonal things … not for persons! That’s an inviolate rule. So, the only question we need to ask is, what grammatical gender is ‘the holy Spirit’? The answer will hugely determine translation and doctrine. Is the Spirit “he” or “it”, “who” or “which”?

As Greek scholar Jason Bedouhn explains: This is a case, then, where the importance of the principle of following primary, ordinary, generally recognized meaning of the Greek when translating becomes clear. To take a word that everywhere else would be translated ‘which’ or ‘that’, and arbitrarily change it to ‘who’ or ‘whom’ when it happens to be used of ‘the holy spirit,’ is a kind of special pleading. In other words, it is a biased way to translate. And because this arbitrary change cannot be justified linguistically, it is also inaccurate.

That’s a devastating observation concerning the way our modern Bible versions (mis)treat “the Holy Spirit”! Bedouhn illustrates his point from Acts 5:32 where your Bible probably reads, we are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit ‘whom’ God has given to those who obey him. Bedouhn correctly shows why this is an inaccurate translation, cannot be justified linguistically, is arbitrary, biased, and is a case of special pleading. It should be translated, that we are witnesses of these things, and so is the holy Spirit ‘which’ God has given to those who obey Him. Which faithfully translates the neuter relative pronoun for its antecedent is the neuter noun S/spirit; and remember, in Greek, nouns which are neuter are never persons!

However, if you read a version such as the KJV, NKJV, NASB, NIV, NRSV, NLT, ESV, BEREAN STANDARD and LITERAL BIBLE, AMPLIFIED, etc., etc., you must realize the translators are guided in this choice solely by a theological bias about the nature and character of the ‘Holy Spirit’ that overrides accurate translation when they call the Spirit “who”.

MANY EXAMPLES

Many examples of this inaccurate translation; Bedouhn’s special pleading! translation custom may be cited. Romans 8:15: For you did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption by whom we cry out, “Abba, Father” (NKJV). Several translations ‘suggestions’ here are inaccurate:

First, there is no definite article before S/spirit. It reads that we have not received a spirit of bondage, but we have received a spirit of adoption. Second, why capitalize the Spirit in one instance and not the other? Were the translators to be consistent, they would also capitalize the Spirit of slavery! But of course, that’s plain nonsense. The spirit of slavery is contrasted with the spirit of adoption or sonship. Two different modes of existence, two contrasting attitudes are, and conditions are being compared; not a Person with a condition. Third, the Spirit did not adopt us into the family of God. Our Father Yehovah did. Fourth, there is no by whom. In Greek, it reads by which or in which (ἐν ᾧ … a dative singular neuter relative pronoun (to agree with the neuter ‘spirit’) which as we have seen, cannot refer to a person, cannot be a ‘He’! Remember, neuter nouns always refer to non-persons.) This leads us to the next example. Romans 8:26: We do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself makes intercession for us with groaning which cannot be uttered.

Now he who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because he makes intercession for the saints according to the will of God (NASB, NKJV, etc.) Again, the phrase the Spirit himself is a case of translator ‘commentary’; my euphemism for Bedouhn’s theological bias. The apostle wrote in good Greek, the S/spirit itself. But, even so, the question remains; Is Paul referring to the Spirit of God or to our own human spirit when he talks about the mind of the Spirit? A comparison with 1 Corinthians 2 might shed some needed light …

THE SPIRIT AS MIND

Here is a passage of Scripture that draws all of this together by comparing the enlightenment of the Spirit of God with the spirit (or the mind) of man: Just as it is written, ‘Things which eye has not seen and ear has not heard, and which have not entered the heart of man, all that God has prepared for those who love Him.’ For to us God revealed them through the Spirit (pneuma); for the Spirit (pneuma) searches all things, even the depths of God. For whom among men knows the thoughts of a man except the spirit (pneuma) of the man, which is in him? Even so, the thoughts of God no one knows except the Spirit of God - Yehovah.

Now we have TRUTH IN TRANSLATION, pp 140-141 (Boldface mine and thanks to Patrick Navas for his outstanding book DIVINE TRUTH OR HUMAN TRADITION? A Reconstruction of the Roman Catholic-Protestant Doctrine of the Trinity in Light of the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures for this quote p 486). 

Received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which (to agree with the Greek neuter and not “Who” as you probably read in your Bible version) is from God that we might know the things freely given to us by God, which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit …

For, ‘Who has known the mind of Yehovah that He may instruct him?’ But we have the mind of the Messiah (I Corinthians 2:9-13).

The Spirit of God and the spirit of man are analogous. Just as your mind is not another you, so God’s mind is not another God-person! The same word “spirit” (pneuma) is used for both the mind of God and the mind of man. Dr. Moule in his The Holy Spirit observes; that… the divine Spirit touches (or even coincides or coalesces with?) man’s spirit. God’s self-consciousness, if one may venture into the term, becomes man’s self-consciousness, so that man is enabled to think God’s thoughts after him …

For the moment, a comparison of Psalm 51 and 1 Corinthians 2 has shown that Hebrew and Christian monotheism, for all its recognition of God’s transcendence and majesty … required the recognition of an analogy between God’s ‘self-knowledge’ and man’s, between God’s Spirit and man’s spirit.

We conclude that just as “the spirit of man” is not a separate person within a man, but represents the animating principle of his mind, just so, God’s - Yehovah's Spirit is not a separate person within the Being of God - Yehovah, but His Self-consciousness, His mind. So, in Romans 8 the S/spirit’s intercessions from deep within our hearts is the wonderful interaction of God Himself with our own minds and so the groanings which result in deep intercessory prayer are according to the will of God - Yehovah.

There is no teaching here about a so-called Person of the Holy Spirit praying. Have you known, you know, this ‘deep calling to deep’? Oh, there is nothing like it. To know that your spirit is in tune with the very Breath / Spirit of the Living God! You are breathing in harmony with the Father - Yehovah and the Son. You know, as Jesus said it would be, the Father - Yehovah and the Son dwelling with you by the inspiration of the Spirit of truth. You have the mind of the Messiah!

Another example. Jude 20 exhorts us to build yourselves up on our most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit (NKJV). Again, we ask, why capitalize the Holy Spirit? In context, Jude is contrasting the attitude of believers with those he just pointed out who are mockers of God, complainers, full of lustful passions, and people who flatter with their words to gain profit from others. They cause divisions and are devoid of the Spirit. These folk do not have the mind of God … But you beloved …praying in a spirit of holiness …

Jude is telling us that we are to pray in a spirit/mind that is sanctified. It’s the old question the Psalmist once posed: Yehovah, who may abide in your tabernacle? Who may dwell in your holy hill? Answer: He who walks uprightly, and works righteousness, and speaks the truth in his heart; He who does not backbite with his tongue, nor does evil to his neighbor, nor does he take up a reproach against his neighbor. p.9-10, and once again I am indebted to Patrick Navas, Op Cit. p. 490. friend. In whose eyes a vile person is despised, but he honors those who fear Yehovah (Psalm 15). In other words, Jude says we are to pray with a life, a mind, and a heart, that is pleasing to God … praying in a spirit of holiness and sanctification! One thing is for sure.

Nowhere are we exhorted to pray to the Holy Spirit! It’s always in or by a holy spirit in ourselves that is in tune with the Spirit of Yehovah our Father.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE “OTHER COMFORTER”?

But didn’t Jesus say that he would give us another Comforter who would be our Helper … “I will ask the Father - Yehovah, and He will give you another Helper that He may be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him, but you know him for he dwells with you …” (John 14:16-17 NKJV, NASB, NRSV, NIV, etc.)?

By now you should be properly able to address this. It boils down to a matter of translation. You already know that the noun Comforter / Helper in Greek is a masculine noun. Therefore, the pronouns which follow this noun must agree in gender and number. “Whom” and “he” correspond grammatically with the masculine παράκλητος / paraklētos, the Comforter.

However, Jesus himself tells us that he is personifying the S/spirit as the Helper. He explains, And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another helper (masculine noun), that he (masculine pronoun to agree with masculine antecedent) may be with you forever, that is, the S/spirit (neuter noun) of truth which (neuter relative pronoun to agree with Spirit) the world cannot receive because it does not behold it or know it but you know it because it remains with you and will be in you (John 14: 16-17).

Jesus is using a regular Hebrew idiom where the Helper is a personification of the spirit of truth. Helper is a grammatical masculine noun but not necessarily a male person. Other factors must be taken into consideration. What Jesus said here accords perfectly with the requirement of grammatical grammar! It has nothing to do with the theological construction of a third person within a Triune God. It is the risen Jesus whose truth will be mediated by the Father’s ruach / Spirit which fortifies and comforts. It’s no different to where the spirit of truth and the spirit of error are contrasted (1 John 4:6).

No translator capitalizes the Spirit of Error for the obvious reason that there is no such person! Consistency demands the same for John 14:16-17. To possess the Spirit then, is to be controlled by the mind of the Messiah, God’s truth. It is to have the life, the hope, the power, and the truth of the Messiah’s gospel message operating within us. “It” (αὐτὸ) is the correct translation agreeing with the neuter noun “S/spirit”. τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας ὃ ὁ κόσμος οὐ δύναται λαβεῖν ὅτι οὐ θεωρεῖ αὐτὸ οὐδὲ γινώσκει· αὐτό ὑμεῖς δὲ γινώσκετε αὐτὸ, ὅτι παρ᾽ ὑμῖν μένει καὶ ἐν ὑμῖν ἔσται.

CONCLUSION

We have come full circle. The Ruach Yehovah is God’s operational power and presence in this world, right from the ‘Law of First Mention’ in Genesis 1:2. From the very beginning in Genesis 1:2 translators face the issue as to whether the ruach is best translated as S/spirit/breath/air/wind. And it’s always “the Spirit of God” or “God’s holy Spirit” and only twice in the OT is it Your holy Spirit or His holy Spirit. We search in vain for the term “God the Spirit”! “He” is not there!

That said, the Hebrew idiom is not afraid to use metaphor or even personification when the Spirit of God is in operation. The Spirit is Yehovah God Himself in action. Sadly, our translations in some key texts in the NT don’t follow the hermeneutical guidelines where grammatical gender does not necessarily indicate biological gender. Translation biases have been imposed for the sake of theological special pleading.

In this way, our modern Bible versions break the clear foundational nexus between the OT and NT when it comes to the doctrine of the Spirit of God. Translation is the subtlest form of commentary!

Written by Greg Deuble and edited by Bruce Lyon

To read all of the Lost In Translation articles go to: https://thebiblejesus.com/ you will find them at the bottom of the heading God, Jesus & the Holy Spirit. Greg Deuble who was a Church of Christ evangelist has written a great book of why he now believes as he does now. The title: They Never Told Me This In Church! You can order it through Amazon.