Wednesday, November 7, 2018

The Remnant


The Remnant

The remnant, at any time, will be found to consist of those believers who feel and own the common failure and ruin of Christendom, and count on Yehovah and hold fast to His word!

These are the characteristic signs of the remnant in every age, who acknowledge the failure but realize that Yehovah is faithful, and His mercy is everlasting.

However Christendom has failed, it is the privilege of every individual believer to enjoy as full and precious fellowship with Yehovah, and follow a true path of discipleship as bond-servants of the lord Jesus.

Divine grace will always meet, as it ever does, those who truly confess their failure and weakness; who realize that without the indwelling presence of the Spirit of God they are helpless to fulfill His plan and purpose for them in their individual lives.

Notice what Yehovah says to King Josiah: … because your heart was tender, and you did humble yourself before me when you heard my words toward this place, and against the inhabitants you humbled yourself before me, and did rend your clothes, and weep before me; I even I have heard you, says Yehovah – 2 Chronicles 34:26-27.

A contrite heart and weeping eyes are the results of the word of God acting on the heart and conscience, which leads to a deep personal devotion to God in total commitment to carrying out His will. This will automatically cause us to not give in to the condition of the things around us in order that we can live above them and pass through as witnesses proclaiming the message of the good news of the Kingdom of God, the Kingship of God, which was the main message of His son Jesus and his disciples.

The believing remnant knows that Christendom is a hopeless wreck, and that any human attempt to restore it is a delusion. We can with resolve go forward holding fast to the message that Jesus and the apostles preached and wrote about, the Kingdom, Kingship of God. The greater the ruin, the greater the riches of God's grace, the deeper the gloom, the brighter the flashes of individual faith.

May the Spirit of God work mightily in the hearts of all His people, healing, restoring, reviving, and maintaining a faithful called-out Assembly who look forward to the coming of the lord Jesus to take his place on the throne of David at Zion as the Messiah of Israel and Lord of all the nations that survive the Wrath of God.

There is always a remnant marked off from the mass of corrupt profession, and characterized by a genuine attachment to God's anointed one, to his interests, and to every member of his body, the called-out Assembly.

No human language can set forth the importance of having a divinely settled authority for our narrow path. All we want is to be absolutely and completely governed by it, to have it hidden in our hearts acting on our consciences, forming our character, governing our conduct in everything. To give the word of God this place is one of the marked characteristics of the believing remnant.

Christendom has utterly failed; its corporate unity is hopelessly gone, just as we see in the history of Israel. But the believing remnant is made up of all those who truly feel and own the ruin that has taken place, who are governed by the word of God and led by His Spirit, in separation from all that is contrary to that word, to wait for the lord Jesus coming.

There is no pretension of the remnant to set themselves up to be anything, no attempt to ignore the sad and solemn fact of the utter ruin of the professing Churches. It is a believing remnant in the midst of Christendom's ruins, true to the only true God and true to that God's anointed one, true to his word, and knit together in brotherly love, love in the Spirit, love to all who love our lord Jesus God's anointed in sincerity and truth, seeking to show him forth in their lives and actions.

Again I mention that the greater the ruin the richer the grace of God, the deeper the gloom, the brighter the outshining of individual faith. May all those who make up the believing remnant hold fast to the end of their lives, or this age, the words of the lord Jesus recognizing him as their lord and master. 



Friday, November 2, 2018

The Faith of Jesus

The New Testament (NT) writers call their readers to believe—to have faith—“in” Jesus, specifically in regard to his being God’s Anointed (Hebrew, Mashiach, or Messiah; Greek, Christos, or Christ: the one whom God anointed to rule God’s kingdom), who died for the sins of all and whom God raised from the dead and exalted to God’s right hand. This is common knowledge among all who profess to be Christians. What is far less well known, however, is that key texts in the letters of the apostle Paul explain that the righteousness of God—a righteousness of faith that includes the forgiveness of sins and the hope of salvation—becomes the possession of believers not due to their own faith in Jesus but due to the faith of Jesus himself.

The NT Jesus is, therefore, not only the object of NT faith but also the source, as well as the model, of NT faith. Which is simply to say that to believe in Jesus is to believe what Jesus believed and, therefore, sought to persuade others to believe: “the gospel of the kingdom of God” (Luke 4:43). The faith of Jesus is often, by Paul, called “the gospel of Christ” (Rom. 15:19), by which he meant the proclamation not only about Jesus but also by Jesus, confirmed by the reference of his Roman doxology to “my gospel and the proclamation of Jesus Christ” (Rom. 16:25).

This means that faith that is in the NT Jesus is faith that comes from the NT Jesus. To have faith in the NT Jesus, then, is to take the faith of Jesus as one’s own.

Paul’s Testimony to the Faith of Jesus

English NT versions typically render Paul’s references to the righteousness of God and the faith of Jesus—in Romans 3:22 and 26; in Galatians 2:16 (twice) and 3:22; and in Philippians 3:9—as faith “in” Jesus. Concerning these texts, translators have been forced to choose between “in” and “of” due to the absence of any preposition between the words “faith” (Greek, pistis) and “Jesus” (Greek, Iesous) and/or “Christ” (Greek, Christos) in the original language. (The original language is pisteos Iesou Christou in Rom. 3:22 and Gal. 3:22; pisteos Iesou in Rom. 3:26; pisteos Christou Iesou in Gal. 2:16a; and pisteos Christou in Gal. 2:16c and Phil. 3:9; also, in Eph. 3:12 appears pisteos autou, which is typically rendered “faith in him” but may also be rendered “his faith,” that is, the faith of Jesus).

The original language allows for either “in” (objective genitive) or “of” (subjective genitive) as possible translations, meaning that immediate context must determine which preposition is the more likely. English versions typically insert “in” rather than “of,” at least partly in view of other “faith” texts in which the preposition “in” (Greek, eis or en) actually does appear in the original language (for examples, John 3:16 and Gal. 2:16b and 3:26, though Gal. 3:26 may also be translated “sons of God in Christ through the faith,” that is, the faith of Christ).

Probably weighing even more heavily against a decision by English NT translation committees to render Paul’s testimony to the faith of Jesus has been the Trinitarian bias of ecclesiastical translators, whose “Jesus” would have had no need for his own faith in God since he himself was “God in the flesh” and “the second Person of the Godhead.” The classic expression of this Trinitarian viewpoint came from the Catholic theologian Thomas Aquinas, who wrote that “from the moment of conception Christ had the full vision of the very being of God . . . Therefore he could not have had faith.”1

However, adding the preposition “of” rather than “in” to those texts in which no preposition appears becomes the more compelling alternative when the texts under consideration are compared to Paul’s reference in Romans to “the faith of Abraham” (Rom. 4:16). In this case also, no preposition appears between the words “faith” and “Abraham” (Greek, pisteos Abraau). All English NT versions naturally render the phrase “the faith of Abraham” because “faith in Abraham” would not make sense.

The fact that Paul’s subject is “the righteousness of God” in all the texts which refer to pisteos Iesou or pisteos Christou, as well as in his single reference to “the faith of Abraham” (pisteos Abraau) makes 1 Quoted in Richard Hays, The Faith of Jesus Christ: The Narrative Substructure of Galatians 3:1-4:11 (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2002), xlviii. 2 rendering the relevant texts in terms of the faith “of” rather than faith “in” Jesus even more probably correct. A consideration of the relevant texts in Romans 3 and 4 supports this conclusion.

First, Paul referred to “the righteousness of God through [Greek, dia] the faith of Jesus Christ [Greek, pisteos Iesou Christou] to [Greek, eis] all who believe” (Rom. 3:22). That is to say, “all who believe” in Jesus receive “the righteousness of God” by means of “the faith of Jesus.” Most English NT versions suffer from redundancy by making Paul say that “the righteousness of God” comes “through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe” in Jesus. What is the difference between God’s righteousness coming through faith in Jesus and coming to believers in Jesus? This rendering makes Paul repeat himself in two successive prepositional phrases.

Instead, for Paul, the faith of Jesus is the medium through which God’s righteousness comes to believers in him, that is, to those whose faith is informed by and modeled after Jesus’ faith.

Second, Jesus’ death on the cross serves “to show [God’s] righteousness at the present time, that [God] should be just and justifying the one of the faith of Jesus” (Rom. 3:26, the Greek words rendered “righteousness” and “just” and “justifying” are all part of the same word family). In other words, God justifies—counts as righteous—all whose faith is “of” the faith of Jesus. To have faith in Jesus, then, is to take the faith of Jesus as one’s own, so that the righteousness of God working in Jesus’ faith, shown especially in his crucifixion, comes to all who are “of” his faith.

Paul’s reasoning in regard to both “faith” and “righteousness” is dependent on a covenantal rather than a legal definition of righteousness and, therefore, of justification.

The legal (and, not coincidentally, the ecclesiastical and, therefore, the popular) definition of righteousness is God’s obligation to his law: God has no choice but to justify the one who obeys and to condemn the one who disobeys his law. (Note that forgiveness is not an option for the God of legal righteousness: justifying sinners because Jesus paid for their sins is not the same as forgiving them in that forgiveness is, by definition, the cancellation of an unpaid debt; more on this below). By this legal definition, Jesus’ righteousness was not a righteousness of, a justification by, faith but, rather, a righteousness of, a justification by, works.

Accordingly, the God of legal righteousness justifies sinners not because he forgives their sins but because of Jesus’ obedience to the law and Jesus’ payment for sins. This cannot be a matter of forgiveness because forgiveness is, by definition, the cancellation of an unpaid debt whereas God, according to the legal (and ecclesiastical) interpretation of the atonement, justifies sinners not because he has forgiven their sins but because he has been paid (or, according to the Trinitarian gospel, has paid himself) by the blood of Jesus to justify them. Ecclesiastical Christianity’s so-called (and misnamed) “forgiveness” comes after the legal justification, which itself excludes the possibility of real forgiveness in that God’s justification of sinners is equivalent to God’s acceptance of Jesus’ payment for their sins.

The same objection to the ecclesiastical theory of the atonement is expressed in The Racovian Catechism, the Socinian treatise on biblical unitarianism:

But to a free forgiveness nothing is more opposite than . . . the payment of an equivalent price. For where a creditor is satisfied, either by the debtor himself, or by another person on the debtor’s behalf, it cannot with truth be said of him that he freely forgives the debt.2

According to the ecclesiastical theory of the atonement, God’s legal justice demanded payment for sins, and Jesus’ blood provided payment so as to enable God to be legally just and, at the same time, to legally justify sinners. Since law, due to its demand for payment, is incapable of forgiveness (that is, of canceling an unpaid debt), the ecclesiastical God of legal justice is equally incapable of forgiveness. (This, I surmise, is why too many adherents of ecclesiastical Christianity have been unable to receive God’s forgiveness and, therefore, remain guilt-ridden).

The widespread belief that God’s righteousness is a matter of law-keeping—and, therefore, came to Jesus through his obedience to the Mosaic law—ignores the definitive biblical text regarding the human reception of God’s righteousness: “Abraham believed God and it was counted to him as righteousness” (Gen. 15:6; Rom. 4:3; Gal. 3:6). Just as was Abraham, Jesus was justified by faith in God’s promise. 2 Thomas Rees, The Racovian Catechism (Indianapolis: Reprinted by Christian Educational Services, 1994), 305. 3 Jesus was not righteous because he obeyed the Mosaic law; instead, Jesus obeyed the Mosaic law because he was righteous, that is, because he believed God’s Abrahamic promise.

This interpretation accords with Paul’s quotation of Habakkuk 2:4 as thematic for Romans: “The righteous one will live by faith” (Rom. 1:17b). For Paul, Habakkuk 2:4 is arguably a Messianic prophecy: Jesus, as God’s Anointed, is the prophesied and coming “righteous one” who would, therefore, “live by faith” and, in so doing, serve as the instrument through which God would justify believers. As Paul explains, and supports with the Habakkuk quotation, the gospel reveals “a righteousness of God from [Greek, ek] faith to [Greek, eis] faith” (Rom. 1:17a). That is to say, God’s righteousness comes “from” the faith of Jesus “to” the faith of believers.3

And this interpretation accords with the covenantal (and biblical but largely unheard of) definition of righteousness: God’s faithfulness to his promise (see Neh. 9:7-8; Rom. 3:3, 5; 1 John 1:9), which conditions justification, therefore, on ongoing faith in the promise. According to the covenantal definition, Jesus’ righteousness was a righteousness of, a justification by, faith in that Jesus believed God’s promise to bless all nations in Abraham’s seed (see Gen. 12:1-3; 18:18; Gal. 3:8)—believing himself to be Abraham’s seed—and so was justified by faith.

Accordingly, God’s justification of sinners is a matter of forgiveness in that, by forgiving sinners, God fulfilled his Abrahamic promise to bless all nations, showing himself to “be just [that is, faithful to his Abrahamic promise] and justifying [that is, counting as righteousness the faith of] the one of the faith of Jesus” (Rom. 3:26).

If the blood of Jesus played the role of paying God to justify sinners, the possibility of forgiveness (which, again, is the cancellation of an unpaid debt) would be excluded.

Instead, however, Jesus’ blood plays the indispensable role of providing believers with the assurance of God’s forgiveness: the assurance that God will, indeed, not hold their sins against them on the day of judgment (as if they were under law) but, instead, will welcome them into his everlasting kingdom. (Accordingly, unbelievers will perish not because God holds their sins against them, being obligated by his law to make them pay, but because of their unbelief regarding God’s promise; just as the covenantal definition of righteousness is faithfulness, so the covenantal definition of unrighteousness is unbelief.)

This assurance of God’s forgiveness in the face of the coming day of judgment is a true reflection of the faith of Jesus, who faced the judgment of the cross with the assurance that his God and Father would raise him from the dead and exalt him to God’s right hand in the coming kingdom. Accordingly, believers in Jesus face the day of judgment with the assurance of the faith of Jesus, in the righteousness of his faith, which they have taken as their own. (This is not a matter of “cheap grace” in that just as Jesus expressed his faith in loving service and sacrifice, so his faith persuades believers to behave accordingly.)

Therefore, God did not forgive sins because Jesus died on the cross; instead, Jesus died on the cross because God is forgiving, and so provided the blood of Jesus to believers as the “assurance” of his forgiveness (Heb. 10:22), the demonstration of God’s “perfect love [which] casts out fear [of] punishment” (1 John 4:18).

Regarding the third faith-of text in Romans, God’s “promise to Abraham and his seed...through [Greek, dia] the righteousness of faith” (Rom. 4:13) applies to “those who are of the faith of Abraham” (Rom. 4:16). So, Paul established the connection between Abraham’s faith and Jesus’ faith: The “righteousness [not of law but] of faith”—exemplified initially, and imperfectly, by Abraham, and exemplified finally, and perfectly, by Jesus—is the instrument through which God’s Abrahamic promise was fulfilled and, therefore, comes to all who align their own faith with the faith of Abraham, whose faith was perfected by Jesus, Abraham’s seed.

Paul’s point that God’s promise to bless all nations was given to “Abraham and his seed”—whom Paul made clear in his earlier letter to the Galatians “is Christ” (Gal. 3:16)—is the key to understanding the relationship between “the faith of Abraham” and “the faith of Jesus.” Just as God’s righteousness came to Abraham through Abraham’s faith in God’s promise—to give Abraham a son, through whom God would make of Abraham a great nation, through which God would bless all nations (see Gen. 12:1-3; 3 Douglas A. Campbell, “Romans 1:17: A Crux Interpretum for the [Pistis Christou] Debat 4 15:1-6; 18:18; Gal. 3:8)—and through Abraham’s faith God’s righteousness came to Israel, so God’s righteousness came to Jesus through Jesus’ faith in God’s Abrahamic promise, and through Jesus’ faith God’s righteousness comes to believers of all nations.

Jesus, then, is the true “seed” of Abraham because he, just as Abraham before him, believed God’s Abrahamic promise and so received God’s righteousness. And just as Israel’s righteousness came through Abraham’s faith in God’s promise (and was eventually forfeited due to national unbelief/idolatry), so the righteousness of the international community of faith comes through Jesus’ faith in God’s promise to bless all nations in Abraham’s seed.

The NT Jesus inaugurated the new covenant between God and all nations by believing God’s Abrahamic promise to bless all nations through Abraham’s seed. Jesus manifested his faith in God’s promise by means of his proclamation of the good news of the kingdom of God, which led to his crucifixion at the hands of the religious (Jewish) and political (Roman) establishments (the “Church and State”) of first-century Judea.

That is to say, because Jesus believed—was persuaded—that his good news of the kingdom of God constituted God’s announcement of the fulfillment of God’s Abrahamic promise to bless all nations, Jesus sought to persuade his hearers to believe the good news. And because the implicit internationalism of his good news of the kingdom (which would subsequently spread to all nations through his apostles) threatened the nationalism of both the Jewish and the Roman authorities, Jesus’ message—his faith—led to his execution by crucifixion.

Jesus’ proclamation and crucifixion, then, manifested his faith in the promise of God, who therefore vindicated Jesus (i.e., declared him righteous/faithful) by raising him from the dead and exalting him to God’s right hand in the coming kingdom. And by doing so, God revealed that he would fulfill his Abrahamic promise to bless all nations by raising the international community of faith from death to life in the kingdom of God at Jesus’ parousia, at the end of the present age.

The Testimony of John’s Gospel to the Faith of Jesus

While the Gospel of John does not, like Paul’s letters, refer explicitly to the faith of Jesus, Jesus’ faith is nowhere more clearly expressed than in Jesus’ words according to John’s Gospel.

Jesus’ faith, according to John’s Gospel, was informed by “the word” that God the Father revealed to him and which Jesus came to fulfill. The perfect faith of Jesus is the sense in which “the word became flesh” (John 1:14).

Jesus’ references to his so-called “preexistence” were not the product of recollection, memories of his personal experience as “God the Son” with God the Father before time began. 
Instead, Jesus’ knowledge of his “preexistence” was the product of revelation. That is, God the Father revealed to Jesus the Son through the Spirit the knowledge of Jesus’ Messianic role in God’s purpose from “the beginning” (John 1:1), and Jesus believed God’s revelation. As a result, Jesus proclaimed his Messianic glory as existing in the foreknowledge of God before time began.

John’s Jesus testifies to his heavenly “preexistence”: “He who comes from heaven is above all. He bears witness to what he has seen and heard . . .” (John 3:31-32). How did Jesus know that he had come “from heaven”? What had Jesus “seen and heard” that gave him this knowledge? The ecclesiastical interpretation is that Jesus’ knowledge of his “preexistence” came from his recollection of his personal experience as the so-called “pre-incarnate Word,” who existed as “God the Son” with God the Father before creation.

This interpretation, however, rejects Jesus’ own explanation of his knowledge about his having come “from heaven”: “For he whom God has sent utters the words of God, for [God] gives the Spirit [to and through the Son] without measure” (John 3:34). According to Jesus’ own testimony, “the words of God” which Jesus spoke about his coming “from heaven” were given to him by “the Spirit.” Which is to say that this knowledge was revealed to him by God. The Father gave the Son “the Spirit without measure” in the sense that Jesus received the complete revelation of God’s purpose, the very heart of which was Jesus’ Messianic role in God’s purpose, a role that existed in “the word” from “the beginning” (John 1:1).

What Jesus had “seen and heard,” regarding his having come “from heaven,” was not, therefore, his divine recollection of his personal experience as the so-called “preincarnate Word” (the way a human 5 being remembers what she or he has “seen and heard” from personal experience). To the contrary, Jesus had “seen” the angelic visions and “heard” the angelic voices that were, throughout biblical history, the instrument of God's revelation through “the Spirit” to his human messengers. (Biblical angels are also called “spirits,” signifying their revelatory function as messengers.) Whether in human form (see Gen. 18- 19; 32:22-32) or in the form of supernatural creatures (see Exo. 3:1-6; Isa. 6; Eze. 1-2), angels appeared to God’s human messengers and announced God’s word to them so that God’s human messengers could, in turn, proclaim God’s word to God’s people.

The difference between Jesus and the messengers of God who preceded him was not that he, unlike them, “pre-existed” his birth as the “preincarnate Word.” Instead, while Moses and the prophets had received God’s revelation in various parts (see Heb. 1:1), Jesus received “the Spirit without measure” (John 3:34), that is, the fullness of “the word,” revealing to him his role as God’s Anointed One in God’s purpose from “the beginning” (John 1:1) as well as in God’s promise in “the scriptures” (John 5:39). Unlike the partial revelations of God received by Jesus’ prophetic predecessors, the complete revelation Jesus received was about himself, the one whom God foreknew and foreordained from the beginning to redeem God’s people.

Therefore, God’s revelation about Jesus’ heavenly “preexistence” as the purpose of God had come through “the Spirit” to Jesus, and through Jesus came to his apostles, who subsequently proclaimed to all nations the revelation of Jesus’ Messianic role in God’s purpose for his creation and in God’s promise to his people.

Jesus’ references to his so-called “preexistence,” then, expressed not his memories of personal experience before the creation of the world but his faith in “the word,” which God the Father had revealed to him through “the Spirit.” Jesus’ “preexistence,” then, was not personal but prophetic, which is to say that Jesus “pre-existed” his birth in the form of “the word”: the original purpose (and later the Abrahamic promise) of God for creation.

And so, when John’s Jesus says, “before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58), he expresses his faith in “the word” that his coming—and, therefore, his existence—as God’s Anointed was foreknown and foreordained not only “before Abraham was” but even before the world was created. And because of God’s righteousness—that is, his faithfulness—whatever God purposes and promises, God foreknows and foreordains, which means that it constitutes a “pre-existent” reality from the instant God purposed it.

Likewise, when Jesus says, “And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed” (John 17:5), Jesus expresses his faith in “the word” that “the glory” that he will soon experience through his death and resurrection was purposed—and therefore existed as a foreknown and foreordained reality in the mind of God—“before the world existed.”

This interpretation of Jesus’ “preexistence” is consistent with the biblical definition of faith: “Now faith is the reality of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” (Heb. 11:1). Jesus believed that his “hoped for” glorification via resurrection from the dead and exaltation to God’s right hand was “the glory I had with you before the world existed” (John 17:5). Which is to say that Jesus’ “hoped for” glorification had been a “reality” since the beginning because God had foreknown and foreordained it, so that Jesus could ask the Father to “glorify me in your presence” through resurrection and exaltation “with the glory that I had with you before the world existed” (John 17:5). John’s Jesus, then, speaks of his “hoped for” glorification as a pre-existent “reality” because God the Father purposed it in “the beginning.”

In the case of Abraham, God’s promise came with the words, “I have made you the father of many nations” (Gen. 17:5; Rom. 4:17), centuries before Abraham actually became “the father of many nations.” The faith of Abraham was his persuasion that his international fatherhood was as good as done—a “preexistent” reality—because God had promised it. Which is to say that God’s promise was a reality of faith for Abraham centuries before it became a reality of fact.

Likewise, Jesus’ glorification through resurrection from the dead was a reality of faith for him before it occurred—in truth, for Jesus, his existence as the glorified Messiah had been a reality from “the beginning”—because God had purposed it and revealed that purpose to him through “the Spirit.” Jesus’ faith, therefore, was “the reality of things hoped for [specifically, his hoped-for glorification]” (Heb. 11:1a). And Jesus’ faith was “the evidence of things not seen” (Heb. 11:1b): the evidence that God will indeed raise those of the faith of Jesus from death to everlasting life in the coming kingdom of God.

And so, though believers’ salvation from death and entrance into the kingdom await the parousia of Jesus to raise the dead, judge the world and bring the kingdom, believers “were saved” (Rom. 8:24), not when they believed or were baptized but when God raised Jesus from the dead. Believers have already entered “the kingdom of his beloved Son” (Col. 1:13), not when they believed or were baptized but when God exalted Jesus to his right hand in the coming kingdom.

Which is to say that believers in the NT gospel receive the righteousness of God through the faith of Jesus. Accordingly, believers receive what God has promised, first, as a life-transforming reality of faith and then, at Jesus’ parousia, an eschatological reality of fact.

This is the faith that the NT Jesus modeled and, therefore, that NT believers are called to receive through the NT proclamation of Jesus’ gospel of the kingdom.

Receiving the Faith of Jesus

f believing in Jesus means receiving the faith of Jesus through hearing and believing the NT gospel, then the primary purpose of the study of scripture must, accordingly, be to identify and understand Jesus’ faith, for the purpose of making Jesus’ faith one’s own.

Just as Paul summarized his gospel in terms of “faith, hope and love” (1 Cor. 13:13), so to receive Jesus’ faith must mean to take Jesus’ hope and Jesus’ love as one’s own.

Regarding hope, Jesus believed and so proclaimed “the gospel of the kingdom of God” (Luke 4:43) as the promise of the ultimate fulfillment of God’s Abrahamic promise to bless all nations. The eschatological coming of God’s kingdom was, therefore, both the objective hope toward which Jesus’ faith pointed and the subjective hope that his faith planted and rooted in his own heart. While Jesus proclaimed the imminent coming of the kingdom with the words, “the kingdom of God is at hand” (Mark 1:15), Jesus also acknowledged his own ignorance regarding the timing of the kingdom’s arrival: “But concerning that day or that hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father” (Mark 13:32). Notwithstanding the difficulties for faith that the seeming delay of the kingdom’s arrival may pose, Jesus’ faith in God’s promise of the Messiah’s resurrection from the dead and exaltation to God’s right hand in the coming kingdom stands as the coming-age hope of all who take the Messianic faith of Jesus as their own.

Regarding love, Jesus’ faith in God’s Abrahamic promise to bless all nations was expressed in a life of loving servanthood for the sake of his gospel of the kingdom. Jesus evidently saw no contradiction between God’s revelation to him of his role as the Messianic Son of Man, the ruler of God’s coming kingdom (see Dan. 7:13-14), and his role as God’s suffering servant (see Isa. 53): “For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). Likewise, to receive the faith of Jesus is to believe as he believed in the love of God for all nations and, therefore, to love others as God in Christ has loved one and all.

Paul’s letters (along with the other NT writings) are, indeed, best understood as instructions for believing readers to adopt and embrace the faith—and, therefore, the hope and love—of Jesus as their own: “For through the Spirit, by faith, we ourselves eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness. For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything but only faith working through love” (Gal. 5:5-6).

And so NT believers are called to run the same race of faith that was run by Jesus himself, “looking to Jesus, the author and perfecter of the faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, despising its shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Heb. 12:2).

Written by Robert Hatch

Live in Peace and Love and Nonviolence

New Testament Scriptures Calling Christians to Live in Peace and Love and Nonviolence

1. "Resist not evil, but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." (Mt. 5:39)
2. "Remind the Christians to speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, showing meekness to all men." (Titus 3:2)
3. "Follow Peace with all men and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord." (Hebrews 12:14)
4. The servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, in meekness instructing those that oppose themselves." (2 Timothy 2:24-25)
5. "Do all things without murmurrings and disputings, that ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God without rebuke in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation." (Phil, 2:14:15)
6. Jesus came "to guide our feet into the way of Peace." (Luke 1:79)
7. Whatever you do to another it is as though you were doing it to Jesus for he said, "In as much as ye have done it into one of the least of these, my brothers, ye have done it unto me." (Matthew 25:40)
8. "In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother" (1John 3:10)
9. "He that doeth good is of God, but he that doeth evil hath not seen God." (3John 1.11)
10. "He that kills with the sword must be killed with the sword." (Revelation 13:10)
11. Forgive "one another if any man has a quarrel with any." (Colossians 3:13)
12. If anyone steals from you "take it joyfully" (Hebrews 10:34)
13. Even if you are unjustly enslaved or imprisoned, you do not resist but seek to convert your Jailers as St. Paul did. (Philippians 4:22)
14. "Be diligent that you may be found in Peace." (2 Peter 3:14)
15. However, doesn't the Bible say we are to obey the Government? Yes, in all things, which are not contrary to the Gospel, but if Jesus says live in peace and the government says go to war, then "We ought to obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29)
16. The Fruit of the Spirit is Peace...Love...Gentleness...Meekness" (Galatians 5:22)
17. "Walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called with all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love, endeavoring to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of Peace." (Ephesians 4:1-3) 5
18. Peace is the Gospel. This is the doctrine of Christ. "Whosoever transgresses and abides not in the Doctrine of Christ hath not God." (2John 2:1)
19. "The fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace." (James 3:18)
20. "Whosoever compels you to go a mile with him, go with him twain." (Mt.5:41)
21. "When they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another" (Matthew 10:32)
22. This world is not your home. "You are citizens of heaven." (Philippians 3:20)
23. "I say unto you love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use and persecute you, that you may be children of your father which is in heaven." (Matthew 5:44-45)
24. "Behold I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves; be ye therefore as wise a serpents, and as harmless as doves." (Matthew 10:15)
25. "Have peace with one another." Romans 9:50)
26. "Let us follow after the things that make for peace." (Romans 14:19)
27. "God hath called us unto Peace." (1 Corinthians 7:15)
28. "Live in peace." (2 Corinthians 13:11)
29. Jesus mission was to "Preach Peace." (Acts 10:36)
30. Jesus came and "preached peace." (Ephesians 2:17)
31. "Seek Peace and ensue it." (1Peter 1:3)
32. "As you would that men would do to you, do ye also to them likewise." (Luke 6:31)
33. "We are counted as sheep for the slaughter." (Romans 8:36)
34. "Blessed are the Peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God." (Matthew 5:19)
35. "He hath given us the ministry of reconciliation" (2 Corinthians 5:18)
36. "As far as your responsibility goes, live at peace with all men." (Romans 12:18 Phillips translation)
37. "On earth peace, good will towards men." (Luke 2:14)
38. "If any man will sue thee at the law to take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also." (Matthew 5:40)
39. "Ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars, see that ye be not troubled." (Matthew 24:8)
40. "My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight that I should be delivered of the Jews." (John 18:36)
41. "Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword, shall perish with the sword." (Matthew 26:52)
42. "Bless them that persecute you: bless and curse not." (Romans 12:14)
43. "Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good." (Romans 12:20)
44. "Recompense no man evil for evil." (Romans 12.:7)
45. "Being reviled, we bless. Being persecuted we suffer it. Being defamed, we entreat." (1Corinthians 4:12-13)
46. "Dearly Beloved, avenge not yourselves but rather give place unto wrath, for it is written Vengeance is mine, I will repay saith the Lord." (Romans 12:19)
47. "Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him, if he thirst, give him drink." (Romans 12:9)
48. "See that none render evil for evil, or railing for railing, but contrariwise blessing." (1 Peter3:9)
49. God's primary title in the New Testament is The God of Peace. It is used six times (Rom. 15:33, Heb. 13:20, Phil. 4:9, Rom. 16:20, 1 Thess. 5:3, 2 Thess. 3:16)
50. "Blessed are the Meek for they shall inherit the earth." (Mt.5.5)
51. "God is not the author of confusion, but of Peace." (1Cor.14:33)
52. "How beautiful on the mountains are the feet of them that preach The Gospel of Peace."
53. "Finally Brethern, farewell, be perfect. Be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace and the God of Love and Peace shall be with you." (2 Cor.13.11)

The Struggle for Holiness in 1 Peter


The Struggle for Holiness in 1 Peter

Introduction

The whole of the letter revolves around the imperative, “be holy.”1 We can see in this general epistle the fulfillment of Christ’s imperative for Peter: “When you are converted, strengthen your brothers,” and “Feed my sheep.”2 Indeed, not only in this epistle do we witness this, but in the record of his sermons in Acts as well.

Of all the imperatives found in 1 Peter the call to holiness is the major one that Peter is striving to lead us to. This is to say that the multitude of imperatives point to, and are subservient to, being holy.

Holiness because of God

We are elect (Greek eklektos) because of the planned purpose of God from before the world began.3 God’s purpose for us involves sanctification of the spirit (from the Greek word hagiasmos which in other places is translated holiness). Sanctification is used in the N.T. of the separation of the believer from evil things and ways.”4 The election of God and the work of the spirit has a purpose, according to Peter, that is obedience in response to what has been done for us, and what can be expected in the future. “Obeying Jesus and being sprinkled with his blood” nicely sums up our initial obedient response to the Gospel of the Kingdom in addition to our acceptance of the Messiah’s shed blood. All this involves a proper hearing and understanding which is given by the spirit, then which presupposes our responsibility. This is the theme Peter carries throughout his letter, which is based on the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ, as a sign of God’s covenant.5 Peter describes our standing before God, and our responsibility to it.

Peter stresses the salvation God has bought for us in verses 3-5. Peter used the term “blessed” in connection with God6 and indeed what follows is praiseworthy. Because of God’s mercy (which is more than we can fathom), He has given us living hope by showing Himself faithful and trustworthy in raising Jesus from the dead. We don’t have just a theory, but a real hope. This living hope can’t be taken away. This of course does not negate our ability to reject it. God will let each person decide.

Although our living hope is cause for great rejoicing, there are difficulties in life that bring distress. The various trials (which are expanded on later in the letter), have a proving effect upon our faith. When our faith is tried and proven genuine, it is more precious than any earthly treasure, and will be for our praise, honor and glory when Christ returns. As Jesus, we can endure the present distress, for the joy that is set before us. Even though the original readers had not seen Jesus, they believed in, and loved him. This has direct application for us which goes without saying.

The salvation that produces this unspeakable joy was of great interest to the prophets. The basis of their work pointed to what we now possess. They, however, talked about things that would be years in the future. The angels even took an interest. “The very fact that angels know so much enhances the sense of wonder at the things they do not know.”7 Peter may be thinking of Jesus’ statement: “But blessed are your eyes for they see, and your ears for they hear. For assuredly, I say to you that many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see, and did not see it, and hear what you hear but did not hear it.”8 Here Peter stresses the desire of angels and the men of God to understand the great salvation which has been accomplished for us. “Only after affirming the beauty and power of the Christian vocation and the new mode of existence into which they have been drawn does the author proceed to the demands of living out this new mode of existence.9 In this entire portion Peter seems to be wanting us to be sure we realize what has been done for us. This passage is foundational for what is to follow.

Peter introduces our responsibility with the imperative “gird up the loins of your mind.” Therefore as a result of the proceeding truth, get ready for the time until Jesus Christ is revealed. The subject of holiness is opening here by the example of preparation. Many commentators compare this with the first Passover when the people were to be prepared to move out of Egypt. Ours is not a literal moving, seen by the way we are to prepare. It will take a sober mind, “one that is free from intoxicants”10 of the world, and be settled in the hope we have at the revelation of Jesus Christ. It is important that our hope have the same effect on us that Jesus’ hope had on him; to remain steadfast and unmovable.

Living up to our responsibilities will result in the old life being replaced by a new one. Repentance is not mentioned directly in 1 Peter, but the activity of repenting is so often alluded to. Peter describes the manifestations of repentance without using the word. The full measure of repentance, that is the final goal, of “turning from the former ways,” is holiness. Any recess from that “repenting” activity works against holiness. It was ignorance that brought about the former lifestyle with its lusts.11 We should always be active in our turning from the world and the desires it fosters.

To dispel that ignorance Peter gets right to the point. “But as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct.”12 As we shall see, Peter applies this imperative to all forms of behavior, and all areas of life. There is no “compartment” in life which is beyond the scope of “all your conduct.” This is not a holiness which is separated from the world, as ascetics would be,13 but Peter brings holiness into daily interaction within the world.14

To reinforce Peter’s imperative he quotes from Leviticus, a demand and fact that has never changed, “Be holy for I am holy.”15 “And” Peter continues, if you call on the Father, remember, He is the one who judges every one’s work. “Christians are not exempt from judgment just because they address God as father; on the contrary they will face the universal judgment of God before everyone else.16 That fact should lead to fear that influences our behavior 17 which will drive us toward holiness. Peter wants to impress this truth.

Our redemption and atonement, is in part, from the old empty way of life that we received by our heritage. Again, here the idea of repentance is set forth. We were purchased from that empty lifestyle our fathers taught us with a purchase price far more valuable than any earthly treasure. Peter reinforces the fact that this was long planned for in order that we can have faith and hope in God.

Peter makes a transition to the ethical portion of his letter by reminding his readers of their progress so far. They have purified their lives by obeying the truth and been born again by the incorruptible word of God that abides forever. This recalls the parable of the sower which likewise combines rebirth under the influence of the word/seed Gospel of the Kingdom (Matt. 13:19; Luke 8:11, 12). They have started down the road toward holiness (sanctification), but have not reached the destination. Here Peter goes into his teaching on holiness in daily living as a result of what God has done. This will lead to the inheritance of the Kingdom in the age to come.

To conclude this section, holiness for the believers is not an option when one considers what God has done for us, and the great lengths God has gone to, to secure His plan for our salvation. The holiness Peter calls us to is similar to the perfection Jesus call us to18. It should not be thought of as sinlessness, but rather obedience and maturity. Holiness and perfection, like ageing, won’t be concluded until we die. We must keep working towards them without any recess or vacation from the process.

Holiness is a matter of personal responsibility

Peter puts the responsibility for holiness squarely on the shoulders of the believer. The phrases: “Since you have purified your souls,” contrasted with “being born again,”19 clearly show that the salvation equation has man’s side and God’s. It’s man’s side that Peter directs the majority of the remainder of the letter to.

In response to God, as stated above, Peter drives us to some practical results of hearing the gospel20 which amounts to repentance from malice, deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and evil speaking. Theses are not to simply be refrained from, because this would not work to bring holiness, they are to be replaced by truth from God’s word. The putting off, putting on process is clearly an activity of repentance. It is through repentance that holiness can be obtained. In other words it means seeing this world, what it offers, and the suffering we endure through different eyes.

The struggle for holiness in various life situations

One’s station in life does not insure nor deny gaining holiness. Starting at the bottom of the social ladder, Peter speaks to the condition of slaves, in the worst possible situation; having a perverse master. Here is one of Peter’s many imperatives, “be submissive (or defer) to your masters.”21 Holiness does not require “good and gentle masters”, it requires submissiveness, to even the harsh. This submissiveness is ultimately to God. With this in mind then, suffering on the part of the slave for doing what is considered a duty, with patience, brings God’s grace. “...there is grace (i.e., credit with God) reserved for the patient endurance of unjust punishment or of suffering for doing good”22 This “credit with God,” is the substance of holiness. It is His presence in the life of a believer that is being sanctified. Being holy through submissiveness to God in the harsh situations of life shows one’s level of holiness. It is the ability to find peace in the presence of God in the hard times. As the Apostle Paul wrote, “His spirit bears witness with our spirit that we are His children.”23

Moving up the social ladder we come to wives

With the same language, Peter addresses the married women. Although Peter gives more space to the wives than husbands it “indicates the author’s consistent interest in the subordinate or potentially oppressed partner in any given relationship.”24 So here too, the wife is to be submissive to her husband, whether believer or not. The connection to holiness can be seen in Peter’s use of “conduct” which refers back to Cp. 1:15. That holy conduct may win over an unbelieving husband. However, that should not be the goal of a holy life, because the husband may not be won. Peter lists ways in which holiness is accomplished beyond submissiveness. Outward adornment should be replaced with a gentle and quiet spirit. He uses Sarah as an example. What God considers important, must supersede what women think is important, or else they will not see the beauty in a gentle and quiet spirit. These are qualities the wives can have in common with Jesus, which points to holiness.

The next rung of the social ladder is occupied by husbands

“Husbands, you too, have to know how to live holy lives with your wives.” The husbands are not directed toward any specific sort of suffering, but are told to live with the women with understanding. As in the previous two situations, the husbands are required to put effort into their actions toward their wives, which will show holiness. They need to show understanding, and show honor to the wife. Paul also points this fact out when he says that we should have a “condescending” attitude toward others.25 The connection here to holiness is evident in the phrase: “that your prayers are not hindered.” The lifestyle Peter is addressing shows a close connection with God, one in which prayers are effective and an attitude of dependence is displayed.

The highest rung on the ladder that Peter addresses is occupied by elders

 Peter addresses the elders as “fellow elders,” and exhorts them, not in terms of qualifications, but in terms of how the elders should oversee the flock. It is thought that this does not refer to an early organizational structure. “The elders do not occupy positions in a hier-archalized organizational structure, of which there is no hint in 1 Peter. It is thus inappropriate and anachronistic to speak of them as officials or officeholders. They are, rather, leaders whose authority is conferred by tradition and who exercise traditionally associated roles and functions. It is conceivable that, as elders, the leaders of the community could have been particular targets of hostility, but 1 Peter says nothing of this and focuses exclusive attention on their responsibilities within the communities.”26 These elders, Peter addresses from a three sided foundation. 1), As being a fellow elder, 2), as a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and 3), as a partaker of glory. The exhortation comes from one who understands the responsibilities of elders, the cost of salvation, and what the future holds. Each of these is linked to the imperative of being holy. The elders are urged to “shepherd” the flock after the example of the chief Shepherd. This tells us the man’s holiness or sanctification is to be single-minded in the deployment of their duties. Peter calls them to a willing service27 that would exclude any thoughts of monetary gain. Here the Lords words of serving two masters find good application.28 Holiness cannot be obtained in a double minded person. Peter again refers to the teaching of Jesus about those who would be great.29 “Don’t act as masters toward those who were entrusted to you, but be the examples.” Those who are entrusted, are held in higher regard, to those to whom they have been entrusted. Jesus came as a servant, thus disregarding his own reputation and humbling himself in obedience and suffering for the lost. As the chief Shepherd, he is the example of how holiness is displayed in the elders. Elders do not, by the title obtain holiness, rather holy man obtained the title of elder. This clarification should be enacted in churches today.

                                                     Holiness and Suffering

Suffering has much attention in 1 Peter. The suffering Peter addresses is not connected with official Roman persecution. Guthrie works through some general provincial persecutions and shows how these all occurred well after the date of Peter’s writing.30 In fact Guthrie notes that there is “nothing that really differentiates these persecutions from others mentioned in the New Testament.” C.F.D. Moule states “it seems to me that all the requirements of these passages are equally well met by postulating on official persecutions — harrying by the Jews and pagans.” He goes on to say, “it is worthwhile to note that in 1 Peter 4:4 there is a reference to precisely such social ostracism and unpopularity as might lead to open persecution of this sort, without any state intervention.”31 The suffering Peter is addressing, I think, comes from an unbelieving community, masters, husbands, old friends and Jews. Therefore the instructions given are applicable for us today. We may not all suffer in the same way, or from the same sources, but when we do suffer as believers and not wrongdoers, it puts a strain on our holiness.

Holiness and suffering through a co-perception with God. Peter points out that one’s “conscience toward God” can be cause to endure grief and suffering when we don’t deserve it. As Peter H. Davidson says, “what he means, then, is that God is pleased with Christian slaves who bear up under unjust suffering, not because there is no other option or because of their optimistic character, but because they know this pleases God and conforms to the teachings of Jesus.”32 The “co-perception” is understanding the sufferings in the same way God does. Having the mind of Christ is impossible apart from sanctification and holiness. For that reason I understand that enduring suffering as Peter prescribes is not possible apart from being holy, and this type of suffering, does in fact leads us to greater holiness. The same co-perception is brought out in cp. 4:12-14. Peter speaks directly to how we think about the trials we face. The term “fiery” denotes even the harshest trial, yet this is still a subjective definition. Rather than thinking as unbelievers do, we are to consider this something we can have in common with Jesus, which is a cause for joy. We should think about suffering as a blessing, because God’s spirit rests on us. Giving consideration to suffering in this way comes only because we have “girded up the loins of our minds” and see this world, and its suffering through the eyes of Jesus.

Innocent Suffering

 Peter argues for a change of thinking by saying, “for it is better if it is the will of God, to suffer for doing good than doing evil.”33 also that we should not be “ashamed if we suffer as a Christian, rather our response should be to give glory to God.34 Peter isn’t writing this as a theory, but it has evidence in his life. After the council, Peter and the other Apostles wear beaten for preaching in the name of Jesus, they “departed from the presence of the council rejoicing that they were worthy to suffer shamed for his name.”35 It takes a sanctified mind to see suffering this way. Indeed we should see all difficulties in relation to God.

Suffering for being guilty

Taking one’s punishment patiently, when it is deserved, for Peter carries little (or no) merit. Where is the credit? I think this is a parallel to Jesus’ teaching about loving those who love you, and doing good to those who do the same in return.36 This too, takes a new way of thinking that demands going beyond, as Jesus instructed, “so likewise you, when you have done all those things you are commanded, say, we are unprofitable servants. We have done only what was our duty to do.”37 As Jesus taught, where is a credit when you do what is easy? Peter picks this up and applies it to suffering punishment when we do what is our duty to do. Holiness then means going beyond what comes easy. Just as Jesus has shown us.

Jesus is our example in suffering and sanctification

Peter continually appeals to the example of Jesus, as that which should be followed, as are called.38 “For to this purpose you were called. The pronoun ϑΦβϑΦ looks backward rather than ahead, for it corresponds to the repeated ϑΦβϑΦ with which Peter framed versus 19-20. The verb Ξ6802,Ï‘, points to the reader’s conversion from pagans; if the ultimate goal of that conversion is God’s marvelous light (2:9) or his eternal glory(5:10), it’s near goal is holiness (1:15) or as here, the doing of good even when it means suffering.”39 We are following in the way Jesus lived, especially in the face of verbal and physical abuse. Here Peter gives us an understanding of the mind of Christ. Jesus, when receiving insults, and suffering he did not return insults nor threaten. This behavior is reinforced in cp 3:9, again connected with our calling. “Therefore” Peter says, since “Christ suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves with the same mind, for he who has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin.”40 Peter is connecting cp. 3:18 with cp 4:2-3. If we arm ourselves with the same sort of thinking that is found in Jesus that will lead to suffering in the flesh, which will lead to a cessation of sin. The confusion about this verse disappears when we understand as applied to ourselves and not Jesus. Peter goes directly to the lust of men and will of the Gentiles, which points out a different sort of “suffering in the flesh” than from outside sources. The “suffering” Peter here refers to is a suffering when our flesh doesn’t get its way. When our flesh, like a spoiled, undisciplined child throws a tantrum to get its way, we must make it suffer. The apostle Paul uses terminology such as, “I disciplined my body, and bring it into subjection”41 and in a more serious way, “but if by the spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh, you will live”42 and “therefore put to death your members.”43 the contrast can clearly be seen when we consider the imperative “do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God,”44 in connection with “grieving the flesh.” I would assert that we will do one or the other when we are faced with temptations to sin. I think it is clear to see that Peter is giving us direct instruction in regard to our holiness, as it depends on how we think.45 We need to be imitators of Christ, not only in our actions, but also in how we perceive the world and especially suffering. Whether that suffering comes from the hand of men or the suffering of our own flesh.

Holiness and relation to others

These instructions are given not so much as specifics, but these are more general in nature in the community of believers as those outside are concerned.

Those outside or unbelievers are often referred to as Gentiles. This agrees with Peter’s use of Jewish phrases and symbols,46 even though he is addressing an audience of mixed nationalities, Peter combines them into one group, “His (God’s) own special people.” As God’s people, we are called to holiness, there are responsibilities we have to those outside. As sojourners and pilgrims in this present world we all are to refuse participation in fleshly lusts replacing them with “honorable conduct” which reflects holiness. This, Peter says, will bring the Gentiles to glorify God. As Jesus taught, “let your lights so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your father in heaven.”47 On the other side, Peter tells us to “sanctify the Lord in our hearts” so that we can give a reason for the hope we have.48 Again the conduct of holiness, in meekness and fear (of God) will bring the unbelievers to shame when they insult our good conduct. These insults and slander may also come, as Peter points out, from the fact that we no longer run with our old friends as we once did.49 They will face judgment and will be required to give an answer to God. Peter covers these three outcomes of the confrontation between our “good conduct” with unbelievers in this way. They may glorify God, or be ashamed, but ultimately will stand before God himself.

The government is included in Peter’s instructions as an entity that we must deal with in holiness. Because of the Lord we are to defer to the king, governors, or those who are there are representatives. Hereto, Peter connects our good conduct (holy living) with the battle we have with ignorance and foolishness. Humility is one of our indicators.

The community of believers

Our behavior in the group receives a lot of attention from Peter. We are to love each other honestly. Not as one who puts up a front but “fervently with a pure heart.”50 this means, therefore to remove lying, malice, envy, hypocrisy, and deceit.51 By doing this, then, believers can be of one mind. This doesn’t mean there is to be an agreement on every opinion, “but in the sense of being agreeable and sensitive to each others’ concerns.”52 “One mind” is described in terms of compassion, brotherly love, humility, peacemaking, blessing, and hospitality without grumbling,53 toward each other. Indeed, for this to become a reality, each individual must “Gird up the loins of his mind” and “be holy.” The gifts each one receives are to be used to minister to each other so that ultimately God is glorify through Jesus Christ.54 This is all summed up by “submit to each other in humility because we each stand responsible before God.”55

                         Peter also frames the goal of holiness in eschatological terms

As the Apostle Paul mentioned in 1 Corinthians 15: 19, “if in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most miserable.” Holy living now does not guarantee a happy life now. But we are to look toward the future. This is what Peter directs us toward in his letter. He makes reference to the inheritance that is reserved for us in heaven, our salvation that is ready to be revealed at the last time, the end of all things are at hand, and the coming of the chief Shepherd.

Peter definitely looks forward to the time when Christ returns. Peter indicates that holiness now in our lives is an indication of all we are looking forward to. When our faith is tried, and proved genuine, it will give us reason for glory praise and honor when Jesus comes.
And consideration of the judgment Peter warns us that the judgment will first begin at the house of God. Then he reminds us that if the “righteous are scarcely saved where will the ungodly sinner appear?” For Peter it appears that holy living is not an option. Whether in this life are as we approach the judgment and the life to come. Peter seems to agreeing with the Apostle Paul that this life is not the only time that we have hope in Christ Jesus. Holy living is not for this present world only but has reward in the aged to come.

This is the grace in which we stand. It is by God’s grace that we have, not only the hope of the future, but also the power to live godly, holy lives today. This is the true grace Peter wrote about.

1 1 Peter 1:16
2 Luke 22:32 and John 21:15-17
3 2 Timothy 1:9
4. W.E, Vine, Vines Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words Fleming H. Revell Co. Old Tappan New Jersey. Pg. 317
5 After Moses had built an alter, took the blood from the burnt and peace offerings and sprinkled the alter with half of that blood. Following this he read the covenant and the people said they would be obedient. He then sprinkled the people with the remaining blood, pronouncing it to be the blood of the covenant (Exodus 24:3-8)..
6 Greek eulogetos is used only for God. Vines pg. 133
7 Word Bible Commentary, Word Books, Waco Texas. J. Ramsey Michaels. Vol 49 1 Peter, pg. 48
8 Matthew 13:16-17
9 Sacra Pagina Series, The Liturgical Press, Collegeville, Minn. 203, Donald Senior. 1 Peter Vol 15 pg. 41.
10 Ibid, Vines, Vol 4, pg. 44
11 A distinction has been made, between being ignorant and being bad, by Santayana. Although the outcome may look the same, the motive is quite different.
12 1Peter 1:15
13 Too often the idea of not conforming to the world meant getting into the mountains and isolation from the world. This is not what Peter is presenting.
14 Ibid, Word Biblical Commentaries, pg. 57
15 A quote from Leviticus 11:44-45; 19:2; 20:26. These verses reveal that holiness is connected to: 1) daily living, 2) because God brought them out of Egypt, 3) in spiritual matters, and 4) because the people belong to Him.
16 Ibid, Word Biblical Commentaries, pg. 61. This point is also addressed in 1 Peter 4:17
17 I am reminded of the thief hung with Jesus, that admonished the other thief, “Don’t you fear God? We got what we had coming, but this man did no wrong” Luke 23:40:41
18 Matt. 5:48 However one determines God’s maturity, that is what we should strive for.
19 Chapter 1:22-23
20 Chapter 1:25-2:1 is the conclusion with the words, “now” and “therefore” which brings us to a proper response.
21 Chapter 2:18
22 Ibid Word Bible Commentary pg. 139.
23 Romans 8:16.
24 Ibid Word Bible Commentary pg. 155.
25 Romans 12:16. Condescending is the word used in the KJV. “Associate with” is used in the NKJV.
26 The Anchor Bible, 1 Peter, a New translation with Introduction and Commentary. John H. Elliott. Doubleday 2000. Pgs 815-816. Emphasis original.
27 This may show that elders were not just the older man in the congregation, but those who were deemed worthy of this title.
28 Matthew 6:24
29 Matthew 20:25-28. This teaching seems to have lost its force by the time of Ignatius who wrote to the Ephesians. He said, “... it is clear that we must regard a bishop as the Lord himself.” Paragraph 6.
30 New Testament introduction, Donald Guthrie, Inter Varsity Press. Third edition 1970, pages 781-782
31 The Nature and Purpose of 1 Peter, A Journal article, New Testament Studies, vol 3. No. 1, 1956 pgs. 7-8.
32 The First Epistle of Peter, the New International Commentary on the New Testament, Erdman’s publishing Co. Grand Rapids. Pg 107.
33 Cp. 3:17.
34 Cp. 4:16.
35 Acts 5:17-42.
36 Luke 6:32-34
37 Luke 17:10.
38 Cp. 2:21.
39 Ibid. Word Bible commentary. Vol 49. Pg 142. I have use the Greek characters without knowing for sure if they are correct.
40 Cp. 4:1.
41 1 Cor. 9:24
42 Rom. 8:13.
43 Col. 3:6.
44 Eph. 4:30.
45 The same idea of renewing our mind is found in ch 1:13.
46 Peter’s use of dispersion (1:1), sprinkling of the blood (1:2), the connection of profits and angels (1:24-25; 2:6-8;22), strangers and Pilgrims (2:11), Psalms (3:10-12), and proverbs (4:18;5:5), point to the Jewishness of our faith.
47 Matt. 5:16.
48 Cp.3:15.
49 Cp. 4:4-5.
50 Cp.1:22
51 Cp. 2:1.
52 Ibid Word Biblical Commentary, pg. 176
53 Cp. 4:9
54Cp. 4:10-11.
55 Cp. 5:5.

Written by Chuck Jones



CHRISTIANS AWAIT THE ONE-TIME RETURN OF JESUS


CHRISTIANS AWAIT THE ONE-TIME RETURN OF JESUS

Ten years ago the Watchtower teaching that Jesus returned in 1914 became a problem to me. I couldn't deal with it at that time because of a lack of information. Since then I have realized that this subject leads to the question of whether or not the Scriptures allow for a long gap before Jesus returns to bring destruction on the wicked at Armageddon. According to WT theology this is Jesus' future apokalipsis (revealing). As of the year 2006 there is a 92-year gap since 1914. This subject also relates to the popular teaching of a pre-tribulation rapture with its 7-year gap.

The answer to this question is largely found in understanding the contexts in which the Greek words for Jesus' return were used in the Scriptures. So this discussion comes down to the question of whether Jesus' return encompasses two events or a single event. In other words can one say that his parousia is at one time and his apokalipsis is at a later time or do they both occur at the same time?

A great amount of material is available on this subject, but perhaps the most comprehensive is Alexander Reese's book The Approaching Advent of Christ. In addition to parousia and apokalypsis, two more Greek words are involved that are associated with the apokalipsis. These are epiphania and erchomai.

GREEK WORD MEANINGS:

parousia (noun) = a coming to be present. It does not mean an invisible presence. Technically the noun was used for the arrival of a king, emperor or ruler. The corresponding Latin term is adventus. TDNT.

Hence it was translated as adventus in the old Latin bibles. apokalypsis (noun) = a revealing epiphania (noun) = an appearing, a manifestation [phaneroo (verb) = to be manifested] erchomai (verb) = to come [elthon = having come]

THESE FOUR TERMS DESCRIBE THE SAME EVENT ON THE DAY JESUS RETURNS

2 Thess 2:8 "by the appearing (epiphania) of his coming (parousia)..."
1 John 2:28 "when he is made visible (phanerothe)...at his coming (parousia)."
Matt 24:39 "the flood...so the advent (parousia) of the Son of Man will be"
Luke 17:27, 30 "the flood...on that day when the Son of Man is revealed (apokaliptetai)." Jesus uses the flood as a single event illustration of his return
2 Thess 1:7-10 "to repay with affliction those who afflict you, to give relief to you who are afflicted and to us when the Lord Jesus will be revealed (apokalipsei) from heaven with His mighty angels...when He comes (elthe = erchomai) to be glorified in His saints ON that day"

OLIVET DISCOURSE

Matt 24:27: "For just as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so will the coming (parousia) of the Son of Man be."
Matt 24:39 "the flood...so the advent (parousia) of the Son of Man will be"
Matt 24:42 "you do not know on what day you lord is coming (erchetai.)"
2 Rev 1:7 "He is coming (erchetai) with the clouds and every eye will see Him. Please refer back to 1 John 2:28 "when he is made visible (phanerothe)
So the Parousia cannot be invisible or secret because it is the same event as the epiphania which is visible, and the apokalypsis which means a revealing. Additionally Christ's parousia will be seen just as lightning is seen.
Heb 9:28 "Christ...will appear (opsthesetai) a second time for salvation, to those who eagerly await him."

Jesus' first appearance was in the 1st century. This verse clearly shows that there is only a 'second time which is for salvation' not a 1914 return and then a later Armageddon return.

NO CHRISTIANS WILL BE IN HEAVEN AT THE TIME OF JESUS' RETURN.

WT teaching on this is that the first resurrection occurred in 1918 exactly 3 1/2 years after the setting up of the kingdom in October 1914. This resurrection was another invisible event. To get around the problem of the following scripture statements the WT uses the idea of two classes of Christians .Yet this is shown to be wrong by Eph 4:4 "one body, one hope, one baptism..."

Also Mark 3:35 "Whoever does the will of God, this one is my brother..." and many other scriptures. However, the following scriptures demonstrate that this 1918 resurrection event is not possible because all living Christians must demonstrate their faith right through the Great Tribulation which occurs immediately before Jesus' apokalipsis and epiphania.

STILL ON EARTH UNTIL THE PAROUSIA

1 Thess 5:23 "may your spirit, soul and body be preserved at the parousia of our Lord Jesus."
James 5:7 "be patient, brothers, until the parousia of our Lord."
This aspect is not a problem to WT theology.

STILL ON EARTH AT THE APOKALYPSIS

1Pet 1:7 "so that the proof of your faith,...may be found to result in praise and glory and honor AT the revelation (apokalipsei) of Jesus Christ."
1Pet 1:13 "Prepare your minds for action, keep sober in spirit, fix your hope completely on the grace to be brought to you AT the revelation (apokalipsei) of Jesus...."
2 Thess 1:7-10 "to repay with affliction those who afflict you, to give relief to you who are afflicted and to us when the Lord Jesus will be revealed (apokalipsei) from heaven with His mighty angels...when he comes (elthe) to be glorified in His saints ON that Day"
1Cor 1:7,8 "awaiting eagerly the revelation (apokalipsin) of our Lord Jesus Christ, who will confirm you to the end (of the age) blameless IN the Day of our Lord Jesus..." The end (telos) of the age, not the end of one's life. Bauer's Gk/Eng Lexicon.

STILL ON EARTH UNTIL THE EPIPHANIA

1Tim 6:14 "that you keep the commandment...until the epiphania of our Lord Jesus Christ"
Why would they be awaiting the revelation of Jesus if he had already revealed himself to them in an earlier invisible parousia and taken them to heaven?

It is therefore necessary for all living Christians to 'prove their faith', 'set their hope', 'be made firm as blameless', 'be keeping the commandment', and waiting to receive " the undeserved kindness to be brought to you AT the revelation (apokalipsei) of Jesus.." So no Christian can be separately alive in heaven at Armageddon, that is at "the epiphania of our Lord Jesus Christ."

MUST BE ON EARTH DURING THE GREAT TRIBULATION

Matt 24:15ff "Therefore when you see the Abomination of Desolation...standing in the holy place...those in Judea are to flee to the mountains"
Matt 24:21 "For then there will be Great Tribulation....
Matt 24:23 During the Tribulation. "Then if anyone says to you , Look here is the Christ, or, There! do not believe it. For false Christ's..." Why give the warning if anointed Christians are already safely in heaven?
Matt 24:29 "Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven. And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear...and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds." Only after this does Jesus send his angels to gather his chosen ones. vs31
Rev 13:7 "It was given to him [the beast] to make war with the saints and to overcome them."

Therefore the 'holy ones' are shown to have endured the 42 month (vs. 6) Great Tribulation.
So they cannot be in heaven during the Great Tribulation.

CELESTIAL DARKENING IS AFTER THE GREAT TRIBULATION BUT BEFORE THE DAY OF CHRIST

THE ORDER OF EVENTS

Joel 2:31 "The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood BEFORE the great and awesome day of the Lord comes."

So when one refers back to Matt 24:29 the order of events becomes clear:
1. The Great Tribulation
2. Sun, moon and stars are darkened
3. The day of Jehovah when Jesus returns at Armageddon. This is also "the day of Christ."
Most scholars recognize "day of the Lord" to mean the same as "the day of Christ."

STILL ON EARTH UNTIL THE DAY OF CHRIST

Phil 1:6 "He who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus."
Phil 1:10 "in order to be sincere and blameless until the day of Christ."
2Tim 1:12 "He is able to guard what I have entrusted to Him until that day.
2Tim 4:8 "The crown of righteousness, which the Lord...will award me on that day."
1Cor 3:13 "each man's work will become evident ; for the day will show it up because it is to be revealed with fire."

SALVATION FOR ALL CHRISTIANS OCCURS AT THE SAME TIME THAT DESTRUCTION OF THE WICKED BEGINS

Luke 17:26-30 "Just as it happened in the days of Noah, so it will be in the days of the Son of Man they were eating:...until the day Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all....but on the day Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire…and destroyed them all... It will be just the same on the day that the Son of Man is revealed."

This emphasizes that the righteous will be delivered in the same very short period of time as the wicked are being destroyed. Noah's entry into the ark and Lot's going out of Sodom are types of the salvation of all Christians, i.e. to a place of safety. There is no room here for an earlier salvation in 1918 or any split in the times of salvation.

DRAGNET PARABLE

Matt 13:49, 50 "That is how it will be in the conclusion of the age (KIT) : the angels will go out and separate the wicked from among the righteous and will cast them into the fiery furnace."

These details make the timing of the SALVATION (including the resurrection) close to the time of the pouring out of God's wrath, thereby making any form of a pretribulation resurrection impossible.

Evidently the Scriptures show that salvation is in the form of resurrection and rapture as occurring after the great tribulation and, in fact, not until 'The Day of Christ', 'The Day of Yahweh' which is, naturally, a Post-Tribulation Rapture position.

So clearly Christ's return will be a single future event. This means that, concerning this subject, 1914 and 1918 are irrelevant dates in the biblical scheme of things.

Written by Ray Faircloth