Monday, June 29, 2015

Salvatoin and Weakness

 2 Corinthians 12:9 “My power is made perfect in weakness”

Work out your salvation with fear and trembling

Today, the Lord willing, I am going to expound on a very important subject in the word of God. Philippians 2:12 says, “So then, my beloved, just as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your salvation with fear and trembling.”

Today we look at the words, “Work out your salvation with fear and trembling.” Through all my Christian life (which spans a long period), I have never heard a sermon on these words. But these are important words because they have to do with salvation. Our salvation has to be worked out, surprisingly, with “fear and trembling”. We tend to think that the Christian life is all about love, joy and peace, but have we ever realized that fear and trembling has everything to do with the Christian life or with salvation?

If you consult the various commentaries on Philippians, you would look in vain for a satisfactory explanation of these words. I have asked many people, “Please tell me what these words mean,” but nobody has been able to explain these words to me. We have apparently lost the key to understanding the Bible and understanding salvation. And if we lose the key to salvation, we will lose everything.

Even if we did a word study on this verse, we still would not find the answer. We must understand the broad base from which is derived the principle of these words. So today we ask the Lord to help us to understand these exceedingly important words.

Paul worked out his salvation with fear and trembling

How to work out your salvation? The surprising answer is: with fear and trembling. Paul is the apostle of liberty; he is the apostle who talks about the freedom of the Spirit (e.g. Galatians 5:1) and about love, joy and peace. But here he speaks about fear and trembling in the context of working out our salvation! That is not the kind of message that we enjoy listening to. Nowadays there is much talk about power evangelism, about power and strength, about glory and majesty. But “fear and trembling” is not something that we are used to hearing. How do we understand this?

If you consult a concordance, you would discover that Paul uses the words “fear” and “trembling” quite a few times in the very combination “fear and trembling.” This term has slightly different meanings in different contexts. Sometimes it means to be submissive or obedient in the sense that slaves are to be submissive to their masters. We may be surprised that Paul would make this kind of exhortation, but he also applies the term “fear and trembling” to himself. In 1 Corinthians 2:2-3, for example, he says, “For I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified. And I was with you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling.”

Here Paul is talking about Jesus Christ “crucified” - not Jesus Christ the King of glory, nor Jesus Christ the Lord of lords, nor Jesus Christ the King of kings. He is talking about Jesus Christ crucified, hanging on a cross in utter weakness and powerlessness. Paul says to the Corinthians: “I determined to know nothing else at this time, not even Christ’s lordship, but only Jesus Christ crucified!” For it is because of His death on the cross that He is confessed as Lord (Philippians 2:8-11). He goes on to say, “I was with you in ...” In what? In exercising the power and authority of an apostle? No. He was with them “in weakness”. As though that were not enough, he goes on to say that he was “in fear and in much trembling” - the same term that he uses in the letter to the Philippians.

How do we understand this astonishing statement? Paul, the great apostle of power, is telling the Corinthians that he was with them in “weakness” and in “fear and trembling.” He was weak to the point of trembling.

Have you ever experienced this? At times I have been in such a state of physical weakness that when I lifted up my hand, it would shake. I would say to myself, “What’s happening to me? Look at my hand!” Many of you have probably experienced a fever that weakened you so much that you shook and trembled.

But the apostle Paul fears! Yes, he fears and trembles. Here is a picture of extreme weakness. Can you understand this? All along you thought that the Christian life is all about power. Nowadays we hear so much about power, even “power evangelism”. Everyone wants power. Someone by the name of Robbins puts “Power” on the cover of his books, and they sell like hotcakes. Want to sell a book? Just write about “HOW TO GET POWER” and your book will sell.

But who wants a book on weakness? If a book is titled “How to be Weak,” it would sit forever on the bookshelf, never to be sold. What fool is going to buy a book on becoming weak? It sounds so ridiculous. Well, that’s right; today I am preaching a ridiculous message on weakness.

The Church rejects the principle of weakness

Much of theology today deals with the Pauline writings. Who is the writer of the epistles that we so keenly study today? Paul, of course. What is his secret of power? His secret is none other than weakness, and now he is sharing this secret with us. “I was with you, and what did I do? Did I swagger up to you and raise my chin and pull myself up to a full height of 5 foot 1 inch - and subdue you with my overwhelming presence and charismatic power? Was it in awe that you all looked at me - this great charismatic apostle with a bright halo over his head?” That is what the world would expect of Paul. A strong presence is very important in the world. If you act like a mouse, you cannot be the General-Manager of a company. You need to walk with confidence, wave your stick around, make your presence felt, and look important.

But what does Paul say? In their presence he was in “weakness”. We find this statement so unacceptable that we might suspect someone of inserting these words into Paul’s letter. Sorry to say, these are Paul’s own words. And just how weak was Paul? To the point of fear and trembling. Imagine, the apostle Paul was standing there and trembling. Can you imagine Paul in this situation?

Weakness is a principle that pertains to salvation. Paul tells us to work out our salvation. How? With fear and trembling! These words express intense weakness.

Are you working out your salvation with fear and trembling? Do you sense any profound weakness in your life?

That is the problem with many of us. Many Christians are weak inwardly, but they think it is improper and un-Christian to show any weakness. So even if you don’t feel like doing it, you must give a big smile or else the brothers and sisters might say to you, “What’s going on? You’ve got a headache or a stomachache? Your wife gave you a scolding?” So we try our best to put on a happy smile even when we feel terrible. We are trained to put on the Colgate smile. This technique is actually quite straightforward; you just stretch the muscles a bit, and then smile. And how do you feel? You feel like a complete fool and hypocrite, don’t you? You say “Good, good” when you don’t mean a word you say.

We dare not admit that we are weak or miserable. So we walk around in hypocrisy. Every Sunday evening you are exhausted from a long day of acting in the church. You acted so well that you should get yourself a job at Hollywood. Everyone thought you were wonderfully happy even though you were miserable. That sounds familiar, doesn’t it? We don’t have the courage to admit, “Today I am weak and tired and depressed. For the whole week I just couldn’t live the Christian life. I exhausted myself by putting on a show of strength. And the more I pretended, the more tired I got. Eventually I even lost the will to put on a show of strength. I don’t care what people think of me anymore.” If that is your situation, perhaps you have finally come to where you should have been in the first place.

I think the church would be a healthier place if we could just come together to the prayer meeting or the communion service and say frankly, “Brothers and sisters, I feel lousy today. Forgive me for not smiling. I would be grateful if you could remember me in your prayers. To be honest, I just couldn’t live victoriously for the whole week. I have done things I shouldn’t have done, and said things I shouldn’t have said. So forgive me for not smiling today. Just remember me in your prayers.” That would be far more genuine than the ridiculous pretense that too often characterizes the Christian life.

“Work out your salvation with fear and trembling” means, at the very least, to be genuine and to acknowledge our weakness. (It means much more than this, but at least this.) To be genuine is to acknowledge that we are not as great as we imagine ourselves to be, or as we want others to think us to be.

Paul chooses to be weak

The apostle Paul is not given to acting. Not only is he determined to refrain from acting, he even places himself in a position of weakness. That is hard to understand, isn’t it? As you study his way of doing things, you will go from one surprise to another.

Let me give you an example of this. In 2 Corinthians 10:10 Paul quotes what the Corinthians were saying about him: “His letters are weighty and strong, but his personal presence is unimpressive [literally ‘weak’], and his speech contemptible.” Paul doesn’t have a charismatic or impressive presence. Notice the word “weak”. He tells the Corinthians that in their midst he is “weak”. His physical presence is weak and unimpressive; his speech is contemptible, not eloquent.

Despite his vast learning and superb intelligence (which everyone acknowledges), Paul speaks in a way that is contemptible and unimpressive. In fact he is so learned that someone of prominence once said to him, “Your great learning is driving you mad” (Acts 26:24). Paul is very learned, and learning is of course the basis of eloquence and a vast vocabulary. With a good education and a brilliant intellect, you can express yourself very eloquently and convincingly.

Why then is Paul’s speech so contemptible? There is only one explanation for that. Given his enormous intelligence which everyone acknowledges, there is only one way that his speech can be contemptible. It is of his own choice.

“I was with you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling” (1 Corinthians 2:3). Paul chooses to be weak rather than to impress people with his eloquence. Why? He explains in 1 Corinthians 2:5: “that your faith should not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God.” That is why Paul puts aside all human wisdom. Now we begin to see the striking way in which Paul works, which is so different from the human way of doing things. Our seminary-trained preachers are taught to be eloquent and to display a presence at the pulpit, but Paul does just the opposite.

In 2 Corinthians 10:1 he says, “I, Paul, entreat you ...” Does he say “I, Paul, the boss and the apostle of the Corinthian churches, command you”? No, he says “Now I, Paul, myself entreat you by the meekness and the gentleness of Christ ...” Here he is evidently again referring to Christ crucified. Therefore he pleads in the meekness and the gentleness of the One who was crucified for our sins, saying, “I am meek when face to face with you, but bold in your absence” (that is, he was bold in his letters, at least according to the Corinthians in v.10). Here is Paul’s secret. He does not use human techniques; that is why God can use him.

The Church has conformed to the world

In North America I often visit bookstores, and I am always amazed by how the church today is using the methods of the world to preach the gospel. You can find books such as “Keys to Excellence” or “Strive for Excellence”. The excellence that they are seeking is the excellence that is derived from the techniques of the world, from the business administration of the world, from the leadership principles of the world. That is the kind of stuff that they want to apply in the church. And these books are best-sellers that you can find in Christian bookstores. Some of the writers are not even Christians; they are simply business experts in the world.

We have departed so far from the gospel that we no longer realize that these worldly principles cannot be applied in the church. These principles are the very opposite of the way the church is supposed to function.

But Paul chooses to be lowly. He chooses to speak in a way that puts aside human wisdom, and to refrain from impressing people with his vast learning and powerful intellect. Many people rate Paul as a genius. That is immediately apparent from his letters (e.g. Romans). But at the same time, it is also apparent from his letters that he does not try to impress his readers with his extraordinary intelligence.

Without this kind of attitude, you would not be able to live the Christian life, much less work out your salvation with fear and trembling. You wouldn’t even know what fear and trembling is.

Fear and trembling is a matter of choice. Nobody is forcing it on you any more than anyone is forcing Paul to be gentle and meek. He simply chooses to be like that.

He does not use his authority, much less abuse it. He does not throw his weight around or boss people around. He says, “I plead with you in the meekness and gentleness of Christ.” There is no pulpit-banging. Anyone who bangs the pulpit must think that he has the right to bang the pulpit and to scold people. Have you ever listened to such preachers? They are unbelievably arrogant. They equate pulpit-banging with power and authority. How nonsensical.

The school of Christ

In my non-Christian days as a teenager, I used to read magazines of interest to young boys. Many of these magazines carry advertise-ments of body-building pro-grams. They would show a picture of a skinny skeleton-like figure, fit to be a specimen for medical studies. Then there is another picture of the same person after he enrolled in the body-building program. Wow, now he is a muscle man with muscles bulging in every direction - a true he-man! You take a look at yourself: “Hey, I’m more like this skeleton here. So I have to move on to the other photograph and become a he-man!”

What are the things that attract you? Do you want to be like the he-man bulging with muscles? What do people find so attractive and desirable about bulging muscles? It is power and strength. If anyone messes around with you, you can teach him a lesson or two.

But suppose the advertisement is reversed: “All you muscle men, come to our school and we will reduce you to a stick! Results guaranteed!” Will there be a long queue of people waiting to become sticks? Of course not. It sounds so ridiculous.

But that is the school of Christ. Believe it or not, He is going to reduce you to a stick. Is anyone keen to apply to the school of Christ? Years ago I entered that school, and look at what happened to me. Do you see this beautiful physique?

Strength in my youth

When brother Chris Wong fetched me at the airport by car, I was sharing with him about my youth. In my youth I was a sportsman who was not the least interested in boring subjects such as history, literature, and chemistry. Who has time for such nonsense when you could be playing in the sports field? So I spent all day at the sports field. After a few years of doing this, I was bulging all over with muscles. I didn’t have to envy that advertisement very much because I had quite a few muscles of my own. I used to admire myself in front of the mirror. I would flex this V-shaped muscle, and move my chest muscles up and down. How nice. (You can’t imagine me like that now, right?)

I would look in the mirror to see these stomach muscles - all six square plates down there. I did a bit of boxing, so it was important for me to have some stomach muscles in case I got punched. So that was no problem for me. I admired myself everyday. My father used to say, “What are you doing in the washroom?” I would say, “Brushing my teeth!” “What’s taking so long?” Actually the brushing took only half a minute; the rest of the time I was admiring myself. But you take a look at me now, and you are probably wondering how I could be like that. But that was really me in my youth.

All day long I was in the sports field playing softball, baseball, basketball, badminton - you name it. My favourite sports were swimming, baseball, softball, and the martial arts (to which I devoted quite a lot of time).

What about my studies? Well, in my spare time I managed to squeeze in a little bit of study. Studying was just a spare-time activity. I came up with a strategy that worked beautifully, and I used to wonder why people would spend so many hours studying. My strategy was quite simple. By excelling in two subjects, I was able to pass any entrance examination and enter any school, from junior middle school to senior middle school. (In China, school admission was determined by entrance examinations.) My father thought that this young fellow who spent all day in the sports field would never get into senior middle school. Well, I took my exams with the four best middle schools in Shanghai, and was accepted by all four. My father was quite mystified.

My secret was very simple. First I would excel in English (which was easy for me since I had been in an English primary school). I did a lot of reading in English, so my standard in China was considered very high. I would always get above 90% in any English examination without studying for it. That leaves me with only one subject to study: mathematics. I loved mathematics because I treated it as a game. You can play around with it and get good results. Playing with figures was fun, not hard work. Mathematics was another subject in which I would always get close to 100%. Some teachers did not give out perfect scores, so you had to settle for 99%. With these two subjects over 90%, you are guaranteed a place in any school so long as you pass the other boring subjects - like chemistry, for which I would get about 70%. That was the secret that allowed me to spend all day in the sports field and to build up an impressive physique.

God teaches us to become weak

But when the Lord took hold of me, He really worked on me. The school of Christ led me in the opposite direction: from a muscle man to a stick. Many of you know from my testimony that after I came to the Lord, I went through three years of near-starvation, after which I was reduced to skin and bones. I was a pitiful sight in the mirror. On one side you could play the guitar, on the other side you could play the banjo. What happened to all my muscles? They got absorbed into the body; everything was gone. God really works in the opposite direction, reducing me from strength to weakness (cf. Psalm 102:23).

Anyone who has ever been strong would know what this could do to you emotionally. People go for body-building not only to look nice, but also for its psychological benefits. It makes you feel confident, a somebody. You are on top of the world with an athletic spring in your step. Nowadays I don’t fully remember how it felt. Now I am weak most of the time. And the more I progress in the school of Christ, the weaker I become. But God wants to give us power; therefore He teaches us to become weak.

This does not mean that the Word of God teaches us to take it upon ourselves to neglect our health, much less to deliberately damage it. There have been, for example, some zealous but misguided people who damaged their health through long periods of fasting. We must remember that “you are not your own, for you were bought at a price” (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). Our bodies belong to the Lord who bought us with His own blood, and we do not have the right to harm it. Only He has the right to deal with us as He, in His perfect wisdom, knows what is best for us and for His church. Only He knows how to deal with us in such a way that His power and His glory can be manifested through our weaknesses.

Power is perfected in weakness

Paul went through the same kind of experience. Paul says in 2 Corinthians 12:7: “And because of the surpassing greatness of the revelations, for this reason, to keep me from exalting myself, there was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to buffet me - to keep me from exalting myself.” Even the apostle Paul was susceptible to pride, so he had to be inflicted with physical illness. In verses 8 and 9 he says, “Concerning this I entreated the Lord three times that it might depart from me. And He has said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness.’”

Three times Paul prayed, and three times the Lord’s answer was “no”. How is power perfected? It is perfected in weakness. That is the principle behind Paul’s other statements that we have read. Paul learned the secret that God’s power is manifested only when we are weak.

Paul goes on to say, “Therefore I will rather boast about my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may dwell in me.” Paul not only accepts weaknesses, he even boasts in them. He joyfully accepts the thorn in the flesh.

Take a rose thorn and stick it into your flesh, and you will know what pain is. The word “thorn” implies pain. Paul has a physical ailment that causes him great pain. But he does not say with resignation, “I have eventually and finally come to accept the thorn.” On the contrary, he rejoices in his pain and weaknesses. Is he crazy? Not in the least, for he knows that when he is weak, Christ’s power will “dwell” in him (the Greek word means to “live in”).

In verse 10 he says, “Therefore, I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in needs, in persecutions, in distresses, for Christ’s sake. (NKJV)” Then he reiterates the secret of power: “For when I am weak, then I am strong.” Now we know why Paul chooses to be weak. That is when God’s power is made perfect. If you only knew this, you would not pretend to be strong or try to impress people with your strength.

Are you feeling miserable? If you are, then you are feeling weak. Now is the opportunity for God to manifest His strength in you. So why do you try to suppress feelings of weakness? Why not welcome the fact that God has finally brought you down to utter weakness, tiredness, and even depression? Depression is simply discouragement. What are the things that discourage people? Failure, for one thing. Is failure bad? It is in failure that God can finally work in your life for the first time! He has to bring you low. When Christ was nailed to the cross, His disciples thought that He had utterly failed. His death seemed to have brought His whole earthly ministry to a grand failure. Little did they know that that “failure” was precisely God’s triumph over sin and death.

Paul says in 1 Corinthians 1:25 that “the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God [at the cross] is stronger than men.” How wonderfully Paul has learned that secret.

Let us look at the five things that we have just read in 2 Corinthians 12:10: “infirmities, reproaches, necessities, persecutions, distresses.” I would like to briefly look at these five things that Paul takes pleasure in.

1. INFIRMITIES

The word translated “infirmities” has one of two meanings, and both meanings apply perfectly to Paul. Infirmities can mean weaknesses, and it can also mean sicknesses. That is why hospitals are sometimes called “infirmaries”. People who are infirm (sick) go there for treatment.

Do you think it is terrible that God allows you to get sick? When I get a backache, do you feel sorry for me? Thank-you for your sympathy, but has it ever occurred to you that it is through this ailment that God is making me strong spiritually? If you had realized that, you would give thanks to God for every weakness and sickness. We consider these things unfortunate because we don’t understand the secret of God’s power. When we get a headache, we wonder why God is so inconsiderate. But it is only in our weakness that God manifests His power. That is why all the glory goes to Him.

Some years ago I was preaching in London, Ontario (not London, England), and I was scheduled to speak at the Chinese Christian Fellowship at the University of Western Ontario on one of the evenings. But when I got up in the morning that day, my legs buckled under me and I fell back onto the bed. I simply could not stand up. I tried to get up once more and I collapsed again. I was wondering what was happening to me. I was totally weakened, probably due to the exhaustion from preaching day after day. I struggled a few more times, but I still could not get up. I was staying with some members of the fellowship, and I called them into the room. I said, “I’m sorry I can’t get up. My legs have no strength.” They got so worried that they said, “We advertised you as our preacher for tonight, and people are coming from all over to listen to your message. And you can’t preach? There’s no time to find another preacher. Even if we could find one, the people will be disappointed because he is not the advertised preacher.” I said, “I understand that this is a problem.” They asked me what to do. I said, “You just pray.” They wanted to call the doctor, but I said, “No, don’t call the doctor; he can’t do anything anyway. Just pray. The Lord willing, I will preach tonight.” They looked at me lying on the bed, and they were wondering how I could ever get to the meeting. But I said, “Let’s leave it in the Lord’s hands.”

As the day went on, I still could not get up. There was no strength whatsoever. It was an amazing experience that I had never encountered before. I had been transformed from a muscle man to a person who could not even get out of bed. Pitiful, isn’t it? But all this was happening so that God could manifest His power.

Half an hour before the meeting, the leaders were looking very worried. I said, “All right, by the Lord’s grace, I now get up by faith.” And I got up. “Wow! He got up! But can he walk to the door without collapsing?” I got to the door. “Not bad, but can he get into the car?” I got into the car. When we arrived at the university, I had to walk up a lot of stairs. I walked up the stairs. And that evening I preached with such power from the Lord (I knew it was not from myself) that it just lifted me up as on eagle’s wings. I was so carried up on wings and preached with such energy and power that I could see the leaders’ faces staring at me in amazement, thinking, “Is this really happening?”

That was a demonstration of God’s power in my weakness. That is the way Paul would have it. “Make me weak so that Your power may be manifested.” Many times I have had to preach in a state of complete weakness. Just recently in Singapore, I was sick and running a fever; sweat was pouring down. I was propping myself up against the pulpit. The Lord keeps me weak so that all the power may be from Him.

Another time I was preaching in Edmonton, Canada. I was running a high fever and again they said, “You are the advertised speaker and people are coming to hear you preach.” I asked another pastor if he would like to preach in my place. But he said, “They wouldn’t want to listen to me, they want to listen to you.” So I said, “But look at me. I am running a high fever and sweating away even though the room temperature is moderate.” But he said, “No, I can’t do it. The people will be so disappointed.” He himself was a well-known pastor, but he refused to take my place. So I had to go to the pulpit to preach with sweat pouring down. I preached in complete weakness.

Why does the Lord allow this to happen? He knows that you are going to preach, so why doesn’t He take the fever away? Instead He allows you to preach in weakness, even with a fever so high that you could hardly think straight. But that is the secret of the Christian life.

Weakness is not just physical weakness but also inner feelings of weakness. In 2 Corinthians 11:32-33 Paul recounted how in Damascus he was let down in a basket through a window. How humiliating and undignified! Can you imagine the great apostle going down the city wall in a filthy vegetable basket? There was not a trumpet or a red carpet prepared for the great apostle. No, he was let down in a vegetable basket; he was probably covered with vegetables so that the guards would not see him. Where is the dignity? This kind of weakness is an inner feeling of weakness.

When you feel weak, can you thank God for that? Paul says, “I take pleasure in my weaknesses, and even boast in them.” That is a whole new mentality, isn’t it?

2. REPROACHES

Paul also takes pleasure in reproaches. The word “reproaches” means insults, shame, mistreatment, outrage. Can you rejoice when people insult you, ridicule you, mistreat you? Paul says, “I thank the Lord that I got insulted.”

I used to go from door to door to preach the gospel. I no longer do that. One time in Wales, in the United Kingdom, I was doing door-to-door evangelism. Have you ever tried that? You knock on the door and say, “Hello madam, here is a gospel tract for you.” Bang! The door is slammed in your face. What are you going to do? Are you going to say, “Do you know who is that important man who just spoke to you? If you knew, you wouldn’t have slammed the door in my face!”

You feel insulted and humiliated. But do you know what? I thanked the Lord for it. “Thank-you Lord that I got the door slammed in my face. Thank-you that I am allowed to suffer a little humiliation for Your sake.” For a person from my family background, having the door slammed in the face is not exactly easy to take. Formerly in China, if anyone slammed the door on those of us who lived in power and authority, that person stood a chance of being shot. So this insult was a wonderfully new experience for me.

The word translated “reproaches” can also mean disaster, damage, or hardship. Hardship means to be thrown out of your home for your faith in Christ; you end up sleeping on the park bench. Or you became a laughing stock to your friends and relatives. They call you a nut case for being a Christian. You sit there and everyone looks at you with a long face or with a pitiful smile, saying, “This guy belongs in a mental asylum.” This is enduring reproach for the sake of Christ.

One day you might have to say to your boss, “Sorry, I can’t help you falsify the figures.” “You can’t? You fool! Do you know what’s going to happen to you? You’re not going to get your raise. In fact I’m going to cut your salary!” So you get insulted. Your pay is slashed and other things start happening to you. How do you feel? Can you say with Paul, “I take pleasure in this”?

Let’s take something more common. You pray in public and people say to you, “Hey, we didn’t know you’re a holy Joe! Did you put on your halo this morning?” How do you like that? Nobody likes that. But can you rejoice? That takes transformation.

3. NECESSITY

Necessity has to do with our needs. “Necessity” can mean quite a number of things in Greek. (When I am explaining the meanings of these words, I am giving you their Greek meanings.) The word “necessities” generally means pressures of any kind. We live in a stressful world. It is so hard to sleep at night because our nerves are in tatters, and we need alcohol or sedatives to calm ourselves. But here Paul says that he rejoices in stress and in pressures brought on by obligations.

Suppose you are going to lead a Bible study. You are leading a Bible study, and all the brothers and sisters have high expectations of you. There is pressure and stress. It becomes so unbearable that you resolve never to lead a Bible study again. Worse yet, they criticize your Bible study. You worked so hard, but they still say, “Why did you go wrong? Why did you cite the wrong verses and turn to the wrong pages?” And you say to yourself, “I did my best, and look at the criticism I get.” That is stress and pressure.

But Paul gives thanks. This is what he means by working out your salvation and joyfully accepting weakness, inadequacy, and humiliation. Do you understand Paul? He has a different mentality. Working out your salvation is not pretending to be strong or to be what you are not, but simply accepting every pressure - inward or outward - with joy. That is the Christian life.

Paul goes on to greater things that don’t even apply to us now. The Greek word translated “stress” or “necessities” can also mean persecution or even torture, according to Greek lexicons. Paul thanks God for pain and beatings and stonings, not just for rejection or ridicule (cf 2 Corinthians 11:24-27).

4. PERSECUTIONS

In 2 Timothy 3:11 Paul talks about the persecutions that he suffered in Antioch, Iconium and Lystra, a reference to the events recorded in Acts 13 and 14. What kind of persecution is hard for us to endure? Since you don’t live in China, let’s not talk about persecution in China. What kind of persecution do you experience here? One of the worst is slander (when people say untrue things about you). There is no point justifying yourself because the more you try to justify yourself, the worse your case becomes. Paul experienced this in Antioch and Iconium. He was constantly slandered, and his teaching was distorted. Bad things were being said about him and his co-workers (cf e.g. Romans 3:8). In Lystra he was even stoned as a result of the slandering against him (Acts 14:8-20). Slander is the first step towards physical assault. To justify their attacks, they would say that you are a bad guy who deserves to be punished. So Paul was stoned and left for dead. Yet these are the things for which Paul gives thanks.

Think of the terrible stoning that he received at Lystra. He was knocked unconscious and bleeding profusely. He was left lying on the ground, presumed dead. The disciples also thought that he had died, but he got up by God’s power and continued with his ministry. The fact that he was presumed dead meant that the stones must have hit him very hard, probably leaving hideous scars on his head. He bore those terrible scars for the sake of Christ. How would you like to have a scarred face? Sisters are very sensitive about that, and I think brothers are equally sensitive. Would you find it humiliating to walk around with scars on your face as a result of stoning? But Paul glories in that. He is not ashamed of being physically disfigured. It is undoubtedly very humiliating to him, but he glories in it. At the end of Galatians (6:17) Paul says, “Let no one cause trouble for me, for I bear on my body the brand-marks of Jesus.”

Now we begin to see the stature of the apostle Paul and why God uses him so mightily. Paul is a man who delights in every weakness, from sickness to disfigurement, from inner anguish to pain. He talks about pain, sleepless nights, and every kind of distress such as poverty and hunger.

5. DISTRESS

The Greek word “stenochoría” literally means “narrowness” or to be “hemmed in a narrow place”; figuratively it means distress or difficulty. Paul endures every form of difficulty, including hunger. Do you enjoy being hungry? If you miss a meal, you already feel weak. But Paul lives with hunger. I too have known a lot of hunger, having lived with it for two and a half years. God took me through the school of hunger, and reduced me to skin and bones.

Can you rejoice in your weaknesses?

Let us conclude. We must clearly understand that God’s power is perfected in only one way: in our weakness. The first step is therefore to accept our weaknesses. Paul rejoices over his weaknesses. Since the church has so many weaknesses, we have much to rejoice over.

Does it trouble you that your educational level is not up to the standards of others? Does it give you an inferiority complex? My friend, if it does, then you don’t understand the principle of weakness. God does not care about your education. Man cares, you care, but God does not care. He is not concerned about the academic degrees that you have or don’t have. In the church of Christ, anyone who lives with an inferiority complex because of education still does not understand that we must work out our salvation in weakness and with fear and trembling. It is when you are weak that God’s power is manifested.

People worry about all kinds of trivial things. Some people are bothered if they are too short or too tall. A person may have an inferiority complex because he is 5’1” and the other guy is 5’2”. So he buys shoes with higher heels, as though being tall is all-important. I am still trying to figure out what is so important about it. One time I was in a department store in Kuala Lumpur, and I saw a man who was about 6 foot 5. I observed him for a while, and then realized that he was the store detective. He was so tall that he could look above the shelves to see if anyone was shoplifting. At least there is one advantage to being tall: you can be a walking TV monitor!

How people struggle over elementary things! They think it is humiliating to look up in order to speak to someone taller. A dear friend of mine, Clark Pinnock, professor of systematic theology at McMaster University (Hamilton, Canada), is 6 foot 6. I admit that it is somewhat hard to talk to him because my neck gets tired. But that is about the only inconvenience. Apart from that, what is the problem? Why are you unhappy about your height? Some people are acutely troubled by this, and it eats them up, especially when they are in the company of tall people. Does your height make any difference? Does God care about your height? Will He measure your height at the gates of the kingdom? “Sorry, you’re too short to get in.” Maybe it’s the other way around. Some people may be too tall to go through the gates of the kingdom!

I am mentioning these things because it is surprising how people are bothered by their educational level, or their height, or even the cars that they drive. The car I drive belongs in the museum! I bought it for $100. In North America, cars don’t last very long because the salt used during winter corrodes the body. So my 1977 car is a relic. It is 16 years old but it still runs beautifully. I thank God for it.

Our sense of values must be inverted. Can we learn to rejoice differently from the way the world rejoices? There is only one way to experience God’s power, and that is to rejoice in weakness, in being lowly, in being nothing.

Paul understands God’s power, and I hope you too will understand it.

“Lord, I am so weak. I have no power of my own. I am nothing; I can do nothing; I know nothing. Please let Your power come into my life.” Brothers and sisters, you are not going to be saved merely by accepting His gift of salvation, but by letting His salvation work in you. That is the only way that salvation can be worked out.

Have you ever heard this properly expounded to you? I have not. I am also in the process of learning this lesson. I thank the Lord for teaching me how to be weak, and how to live in the weakness of Christ. By nature I am not weak, and neither is Paul. So weakness is something that we have to learn. We learn not only to accept it, but even to delight in it. Then people will say, “Now I see God's power and glory in your life!”

Sermon by Pastor Eric Chang, delivered on January 10, 1993, at Gereja Christian Disciples Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

Lamb or Wolf?

 2 Corinthians 12:9 “My power is made perfect in weakness”

Do we see the pitiful plight of those around us?

In the neighbourhood where we have recently moved to live in Hong Kong, they are building new roads and planting trees on both sides, so as to attract more people to move into this area. However, the effort only works in part. I often like to take walks. I would notice that these young trees are still very thin with a few sparse branches, making a heroic attempt to grow in a very hostile environment.

Why do I say it is a hostile environment? It is difficult for the poor trees to grow under the circumstances. The local administration has run a water pipe along the whole line of trees. The pipe has little holes in it at every point where it passes a tree. The intention is to water these trees at the appropriate points, so that these poor young trees would be able to survive in the intense heat of the Hong Kong summer. The holes on this water pipe must have become clogged. When I look at these little trees, I feel very sad for them because I see that most of them are withering. I am not even sure whether they are dead or alive. The leaves are dry and they are almost dark brown by now. The pitiful attempt to put forth some branches has already begun to fail.

The tragedy of this is that there is this big black water pipe that runs right over the top of their roots and yet they are getting no water. They are dying with all this fresh water rushing right on top of them. Life is so near, and yet so far away. You can imagine yourself as one of these trees: seeing water rushing past over you and you are dying of thirst, baked in the sun, longing for a few drops of water. The water just passes you by. Somewhere further down the pipe, one or two trees are getting some water and they are flourishing. Their leaves are green and they are growing. Yet the majority of the trees are dying right under the water pipe. I am thinking: “Where is the caretaker? What is he doing? Is he waiting for them all to die?”

So, each time I walk along the road, I think to myself that there is so much to learn from this situation. We have in ourselves, as the Lord’s people, this water of life. As Paul says, we have this treasure (this water of life) in these earthen vessels (2 Cor:4:7).

I wonder how many people right beside us would be looking up to us, saying: “Give us a little drink, we are perishing! If you don’t hurry up, it will be too late!” Could it be that we are so busy with some distant objectives that we bypass those next to us, leaving them to perish? But no, we are too busy to get the water to somewhere else, further down somewhere. Perhaps we congratulate ourselves and say: “Yes, over there, there are some trees prospering because of our care. Our water pipe is still functioning.”

But what about the majority of those who die of thirst and are perishing along the way?


Where is the living water?

Where is the church? Where is the functioning church? Here and there a little tree is growing, and we congratulate ourselves and say that because of us, there is this little tree growing there. And look over there, there is another one!

But what about the majority who perish? We have no time to think about them. We are just one water pipe. How many trees are we supposed to look after anyway? In that water pipe near my home, there is enough water for all the trees if only there is the willingness to open up a little bit, if only the gardener has ensured that these pipes are unclogged so that the water could come out for each of these trees, not just for some of them.

I wonder if we are these clogged-up water pipes?

But here today in Penang, we have a new flow of water. I hope, by the grace of God, those who are thirsty and earnestly long for that water may find it here.


I find the thirsting everywhere

A few months ago, on my flight back to Montreal from the Middle East, I was sitting next to a gentleman. As we talked to one another, I discovered that he had been seeking the truth since his youth, looking for answers to the questions of life, but in vain. He found nothing, and there was no one to tell him what life was about. He was sitting next to his son, a handsome young fellow, who is now an archaeologist. As I was talking to him, I asked him about his life. He said: “Well, you see, I was a medical student and my heart was longing to know what life is all about. I was searching for answers to my many, many questions.” He even gave up medicine for a time to study philosophy, so that he would get some answers. The only problem was that he got more questions and no answers at all. He is now a Professor of Philosophy at McGill University, and a practising psychiatrist, having moved from general medicine to psychiatry, while also teaching philosophy at the University.

Now, twenty some years later, I was sitting next to him and I asked him: “How do you look at life now, since up to this point in time you have found no answers?” He said: “I’ve reconciled myself to the fact that life has no answers, that there are no answers to be found. There are only questions, and we will just have to accept the situation.”

I said to him: “What do you teach, since you only have questions and no answers?” He said: “Well, I teach them to look at the questions.” I said: “But what about those people who come looking for answers?” He said: “Well, like me, they will have to understand that there are no answers.” I said to him: “Did it ever occur to you that there might be some answers?” He said, “Oh yes, but where?” I said: “Do you mind me telling you a bit about my life?” He said: “By all means, tell me.”

So I told him and he was fascinated. He said: “Really? You actually met with God? Is it possible to know God?” A new horizon began to open up for him. Everything began to stimulate him anew. He said: “Maybe there are still answers.” After we arrived in Montreal, I took up contact with him again, and gave him some copies of my testimonies, as well as some other things that report of God’s wonderful works and reality. Because I had to leave for the Far East, we agreed that when I go back again later this year, God willing, we will get together.

Think of this: here is a person who was willing to give up medicine to look for some answers to questions about life, but could find nothing. He was like this tree, a young tree, a young medical student, looking for water. In the meantime his spiritual life had shrivelled up from thirst. He had become cynical: there were many, many questions, but simply no answers. And he accepted this heroically.

On the way from Montreal to Hong Kong, I was in the plane again. This time I found myself sitting next to another gentleman, a Thai gentleman from Bangkok. As we talked, he was telling me about his life. He had just come back from a holiday touring around Europe. He had taken an early retirement and he said to me: “There is no point to working yourself to death, is there? What is life about? What meaning is there in life? I have climbed to the top, a Shell Company executive in Thailand, and I decided to take early retirement. I’ve got all the money I need and if I carry on any longer, my marriage will break up because I am hardly ever home, too busy with the work. My health will give way. So now that I have all that I want to achieve, it is enough for me. Now, I want to enjoy what there is left of life.” For him, to enjoy life meant galloping around Europe, worn out from touring around 7 countries in 10 days. This was his way of enjoying life. I can think of better ways to enjoy life. For me, travelling is an exhaustion. The thought of travelling around 7 countries in 10 days is enough to wear me out. Anyway, maybe it was something new to him.

As we talked along, he gave me his name card. As he took out his card, there was his gold American Express card. We discussed the purpose of life. For him there was no purpose. I thought to myself that this person had reached the age of retirement, having climbed the ladder of life to the top, and yet he had no clue to what life was all about. He was another one of these trees planted there by the roadside. If only in the early days, somebody had brought him some water. Yet now, all he was content with was to travel around a bit. I said: “What do you do with your time? It must be very boring.” He said: “I go to the golf course.”

But imagine this: if there is nothing left in your life but golf, there is nothing else for you. What a life! It is so tragic! It is meaningless! But what can we say? The spiritual life had shrivelled and died. There is nothing left. Now he just spends his days hitting this ball on the golf-course twice a week. And I didn’t ask him what he does with his other few days. Maybe he just lies there on the porch and sleeps. Dreadful!

We must bring the water of life to these people. What happens to the soul, the spirit, the potentially eternal element of these people, withering away with no water? What a joy that the water of life can be brought to Penang!

In the remaining time that we have, I want to discuss a little bit more about this water of life. How can we fulfil this mission? What is the way in which this mission is to be fulfilled? What is the character of the church and why we as a church and as Christians, so often fail?

Perhaps we ourselves have not properly understood the message of our Gospel. We don’t know what the Gospel is. When I speak about the water of life, of course, I am speaking about the Gospel of Christ. What is the Gospel? Perhaps you have been a Christian for a long time. Are you sure you know what the Gospel is? Do you know how to present that Gospel to the thirsty? If you don’t know what the Gospel is, no wonder you have brought no water of life to anyone. What is the essential character of the Gospel? And how should the Gospel be presented?


Luke 10:3

I would like to give you the text from which I will preach today, from Luke 10:3. To the seventy that He was about to send forth, He said: “Go your way; behold, I send you out as lambs in the midst of wolves.”

This verse is so rich in meaning that the more I meditate on it, the more I hesitate to preach on it. The riches in this verse are simply overwhelming.

Why is this verse exceedingly important? It is because it puts into a nutshell the essence of what the Gospel is, what it does, and how it should be preached. What is more, this verse is extremely easy to remember because it contrasts two pictures: the wolf and the lamb, or more precisely, a society of wolves and a society of lambs.

The Lord Jesus says: “Go out now, I send you out as lambs among wolves.” The more you think about the picture, the more mind-boggling it becomes. You don’t have to have a very fertile imagination to see what happens to these lambs sent out into the midst of a pack of wolves. Can you imagine how long these lambs will last? Would they last 5 minutes? 10 minutes? These poor and defenceless lambs will be torn apart in no time. The Lord does not even say “sheep”. At least, sheep are bigger, almost the size of wolves. But lambs! Lambs against wolves? This is really lambs sent to the slaughter.

Here Jesus says, “I am going to send you out, and the odds against you are hopeless.” What is the point of all this? Is there some kind of strategy in this? Is this a joke? If this were a joke, it is a very poor one for the lambs. What is Jesus trying to tell us?

When you read the Bible, I wonder if the power of the imageries ever capture your thinking. Let us just briefly analyze this into a few main points.


What is the character of wolves?

The first thing we have to understand is the character of wolves. Do you know something about wolves? The Palestinians knew a lot about wolves because they were nomads. Sheep were their livelihood. They had to protect the sheep, and the greatest danger to the sheep of course was wolves.

Just recently, I read a very fascinating article in a 1989 issue of National Geographic magazine about wolves, especially Arctic wolves. They are the same as wolves elsewhere except they live in the Arctic. Some observers were able to come up close to these wolves, allowing the wolves to get used to them, so that they could observe the way the wolves behave at close quarters.

They summed up the character of the wolves in three words:
aggressive, assertive, and completely selfish.

That is the character of wolves. This is not written by Christians for the benefit of my message. They wrote this as a result of their close observation of wolves.

The wolves have a disciplined society, which is based on the dominance of one male wolf. The whole system is one of lording it over others. Whoever is stronger (the bigger wolf, the more powerful wolf, the one with sharper teeth, the one more cunning, the one more fierce, the one that is more determined) dominates the pack and leads the pack where he wants it to go. The society of wolves runs on this basis. Very interesting.

That is the way human society also runs, though sometimes in more subtle ways. That is what the Lord Jesus says in Matt:20:25.

“You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them.”

Human society runs on the same principle as the society of wolves. Who finally dominates? It is the one who has the drive, the man with the initiatives, the person with the cunning skill to manipulate others, the guy who can win the votes. That is the guy who wins, whether he does it by smiling or he does it with the secret police behind him. It is the unscrupulous person in the end who wins. He wants to give you the impression that he is the good guy, the saviour of the world, the saviour of the nation, and most of all, the saviour of you. As long as you follow after him, you will not go hungry. He will protect you and he will do everything right for you - he is the great manipulator. That is the man who becomes the leader.

So when the Lord speaks about wolves and the society of wolves, he is talking about the society of the world as it is. All of us who live in this society know very well who has the influence. In the company, it is either the one who gets to the top or the one who tags to his tail to try to get to the top. So if you can’t be number 1, you can be number 2 by clinging on to this powerful guy to get to the top. Human societies run like this. That is the way it is done.

So when the Lord says, “I send you out among wolves”, He is simply saying: “This is the society of the world. Do you see how the Gentiles work? They lord it over the others.” They all want to be the big boss. The gangsters are less subtle: “Come here. Go there. I’ll clean you out if you don’t follow what I say.” Many politicians do the same but in a nicer way. In the company’s struggle for power, it is the same, isn’t it? Everywhere, it is the same - the society of wolves.

So when the Lord says, “I send you out”, He is simply saying that I am sending you out into the world of wolves.

How do you feel going out into this society? How do disciples feel when He said to them, “I am going to send you out and you are going to be slaughtered by the wolves.” Will they be slaughtered? We will come to that in a moment.


To become a true Christian is to be TRANSFORMED from a wolf to a lamb

But you say, “Just a minute, before we go that far, were we not all wolves before we became Christians?” Indeed. As a non-Christian, I was a wolf, if ever there was one. I know that but for the grace of God, I would be a wolf, as capable of bumping off any opposition and grabbing the top as anybody else. Wit for wit. Strength for Strength. Let anyone challenge me. I was not afraid of challenge. As many of you know, before I became a Christian, my ambition was in the military field. In the military field, you have to be ruthless to get to the top. I was prepared to do whatever was necessary to get to the top in the name of saving the country, not to mention putting myself at the head of the country. Deep and subtle pride. We even hide our own motives, but a wolf I certainly was.

Jesus says to His disciples: “I send you out as lambs”. Where are the lambs? First, they have to be lambs before they are sent out. From this remarkable sentence, the Lord is saying: to become a true Christian is to be transformed from a wolf into a lamb. The principle of transformation is summed up here. God has to do something with me. He has to take this wolf with all its sharp teeth, with all its skill and cunning and ruthlessness, and change the whole character completely to a lamb.

You say: “Wait a minute, I am very happy being a wolf. I like my sharp teeth. Without them, who is going to protect me? I will be defenceless. You just said that this is a society of wolves. I am doing quite nicely in the society of wolves. I’ve got my place in that society. Now you are going to turn me into a lamb and I am going to become lamb chops? All these wolves will be eating me up in no time. I don’t like this. I am left defenceless. I don’t want to be changed.”

And you know something? There are many Christians who are not changed for that very reason, because you are left vulnerable. There are some people who are converted only skin deep, a wolf with sheep’s skin. You are only a lamb as far as the skin goes, but underneath you are a wolf. I hope you understand the metaphor. That is the picture the Lord uses in Matt 7:15.

Too often, we have in the church a lot of people who look like lambs. You just try messing around with them a bit and you will be surprised how sharp these “lambs’” teeth are. They will take a chunk out of you and then you thought, “I never knew lambs have sharp teeth. I thought only wolves have this kind of teeth.” Have you seen Christians going on a fight with one another? When both are bloodied and torn, you wonder where are the lambs? Is this the society of lambs?

Talking about lambs, I find it interesting that one of the favourite symbols of Christians today is the “eagle”. I have many times been given this beautiful verse in Ish 40:31, they that wait upon the Lord shall mount up with wings as eagles. We forget that the part that applies to us is not the eagles’ beak and talons (which can rip apart even a young wolf), but the “mounting up with wings”. There are no talons on the wings. There is no sharp beak on the wings.

We like symbols of power

When you look at the national emblem, do you see a lamb there? No way. What do you see? A dragon. This is very popular in Hong Kong. It is just as popular in China. Or you have the lion, or even the unicorn, fast and intelligent animals as they are supposed to be. Who wants a little lamb as a symbol? It is hard to find Christians who are only interested in being lambs.

Paul used the picture about “biting and devouring one another”. He said to the Galatians beware that “if you bite and devour one another, you might be consumed by one another” (Gal 5:15). Do you know what Paul was saying to the Galatians? “I suspect that you are not even lambs yet. You are still wolves underneath.” Many people reading this subtle statement of Paul to the Galatians never got the full gist of the meaning.

Are you transformed? Are your teeth still very sharp? When you became a lamb, you said, “All my wolf’s teeth are gone.” But how could it be that you still take out the nail file and sharpen your teeth and say, “I need some sort of defence here so that when the wolves attack me, I will give them a few bites of my own.” Have we been changed?

Jesus is called the Lamb

It is remarkable that the Lord Jesus is called the Lamb (John 1:29, 36; Acts 8:32; 1 Pet 1:19). In Revelation, He is called “the Lamb” 28 times! Even more, He is the Lamb that was slain (Rev 5:6). Can you imagine a wounded lamb, a slain lamb? Does it have any power? A healthy lamb is weak enough. But a wounded lamb, one that is slain? This calls for complete transformation. If you don’t like the idea of being a lamb, don’t think of becoming a Christian. Otherwise, you are going to misrepresent the Gospel.

The lambs are SENT out among wolves

This is “mission impossible”. As we said, among wolves, lambs cannot last for more than a few seconds. Just go to the zoo and throw in a few lambs and see how long they last. I don’t think they will even last for a few moments. The sharp powerful jaws of the wolves will dispatch them quickly. Are you fearful that you cannot survive?

So what is the secret? What is the strategy that the Lord has in mind?

The other day I had a cup of hot coffee. I was very thirsty. Yet how was I to drink it, especially in a hot country like this? So my wife, Helen, went to the counter to ask for a couple of ice-cubes. We put the ice in the coffee and immediately the coffee became cold within a very short while. Is that the Lord’s strategy?

Do we take these lambs and let them loose among the wolves, so that all these wolves would lose their fires and become lambs? That will not work. Wolves don’t become lambs by eating up the lambs. You may have heard the saying: “you become what you eat.” If that were true, then that strategy might work: the more lambs they eat, the more they become lamb-like. Unfortunately, it does not work like this, does it? That cannot be the strategy.

So what is the strategy? What is this idea of sending lambs out among wolves?

Here I come to the key area: the strategy is to depend on God’s power. God’s power works through the lambs to transform the wolves. This does not work in natural life. But unless the strategy is to transform the wolves through the lambs, then what other purpose is there in sending the lambs to die? Certainly any lamb sent among wolves must be prepared to die, and some will indeed be killed by the wolves. But wolves are not transformed by doing what is natural to them - eating lambs. Clearly only God’s own creative power, working through the lambs, can transform the wolves.

Gospel -- to be brought out at the cost of your lives

The disciples were sent out by Jesus to preach the gospel. Now the gospel is brought to the wolves at the cost of the lambs. Since lambs in the Bible were offered up as sacrificial animals, we can see that the gospel has to be preached at the cost of your life. There is no cheap and easy way to bring the gospel to others. You would not have believed that from the way that the gospel is taught today. You would have thought that preaching the gospel is the easiest thing under the sun. The former Soviet Union has just opened up and we see in the news that every kind of person is rushing in, and they stand in the Red Square preaching. Crowds gather to listen. Nothing could be easier than preaching the gospel. Nothing could be easier than transforming wolves into lambs. Just talk, talk, and talk. The better you can talk, the more successful you are. As the Chinese saying goes: “You just depend on your 3 inches of incorruptible tongue.” You can then talk the whole world into submission: the lambs come to talk the wolves into becoming lambs.

But that’s not the picture. That’s why I said earlier that maybe we didn’t even understand how the gospel is supposed to be preached. Worse than that, maybe we didn’t even understand the character of the gospel. Please understand that the gospel requires your transformation, and you alone know whether or not you are transformed. You may not want to be transformed because you know you can’t make your way in the world once you are transformed. That is why many Christians don’t want to be transformed. You would lose your place in the society of wolves. No lambs would have any status among wolves, needless to say.

In simple language, that means that there are indeed very few transformed Christians. Let’s get that clear. That’s what the Lord Himself said. He said that the saved will be few (Matt 7:14; 22:14; cf. 1 Pet 3:20). I have often thought about that and I understand now. Why only a few? Because you’ve got to be a lamb. If you are a lamb, you can’t survive in this world (the society of wolves) except by a certain way and that is what we are going to close on in a moment.

How is the gospel preached?

By what principle does it work? It is a principle that is amazing and yet too costly for us. That’s why there is so little of true Christianity around. Believe me, there is very little of it around. If you can find it anywhere, go after it and drink that precious water. Never let that water go, because you can search all over the world for a place where the gospel is preached in the way that it is meant to be preached, and you would have a hard time finding it. It is not because people don’t want to preach it, but somehow, it has disappeared. The gospel is too difficult to comprehend.

Let me try to close on this very point: How is the gospel preached? What is the nature of the gospel?

The heart of the gospel is Jesus Himself. Consider how it was done. When Jesus came into the world, He did not come as the glorious King born in a palace. He didn’t even have a proper place to be born in. He was born among the animals, not even in a place for human beings. In other words, He was born in weakness.

When He began His ministry, how did He live? He said, “I can do nothing of myself.” He lived in total weakness. He chose to be weak. That is why in John 5:19, 30, we have “Jesus therefore answered and was saying to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things the Son also does in like manner.”

Again, in John 5:30,

“I can do nothing on My own initiative. As I hear, I judge; and My judgment is just, because I do not seek My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.”

Jesus was saying: “I can do nothing by Myself. Whatever I see the Father do, I do. Whatever He tells Me to do, I do. I live only by His will. I have no strength of My own. I don’t have any power of My own. I don’t function by My own power. I am nothing and He is everything.” He was born in weakness and He lived in weakness.

Do you know the story of Gethsemane? Do you see Him there in His strength, in His majesty, in the garments of a high priest in all His glory? No. What you see in the Garden of Gethsemane is a man with His face to the ground, with tears running down His face crying, “Oh Father, if this cup can be taken away from Me, please take it away. I really can’t drink it. I can’t.” Is this man the hero? Is this man, with tears running down, going to conquer the world? It is disgraceful. He is sprawled on the ground, a grown man crying. In our tradition it is shameful for a man to cry. And here He is on the ground crying.

In Heb 5:7, we read:

In the days of His (Jesus’) flesh, He offered up both prayers and supplications with loud crying and tears to the One able to save Him from death, and He was heard because of His piety.

What? Save Him from death? Shameful! Look at our soldiers that march bravely to death! Unflinching! Glorious! “Charge!” - and into the battle they go. Cut down and crumpled on the ground, without a wail and without a murmur they die. These are men indeed! But what do we see in Jesus? The Lamb. Weakness! Did you ever look at it like that? Those are the facts.

“Strong crying and tears” - the picture of utter weakness. Was He heard because of His unspeakable courage? No. He was heard because of His “fear”. (The word in the Greek text can mean “fear, anxiety” in general, but many scholars think that here and in some other places in the New Testament, the word has the specific meaning: “fear of God, piety”.) Jesus was no hero, nor was it His goal to be a hero. He was the Lamb, weak and defenceless, born in weakness, and He lived in weakness of His own choice. In the Garden of Gethsemane, you see nothing but weaknesses. There was no strength to be seen. Is this the hero you want to follow? Then finally, on the cross, what do you see there? A glorious hero stretched out without a murmur? Was He not heard to say: “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” Does this not sound like a complaint against God? What is going on here? Could those around the cross have known that Jesus was quoting the 22nd Psalm? Do you know that this psalm, in fact, utter a heart-cry to God from a situation of total weakness while trusting in God alone for ultimate vindication and victory?

Paul summed it up in these words in 2 Cor 13:4, He was crucified in weakness, yet He lives by the power of God.

Jesus did not live by His own power. He was crucified in weakness. Let this get into our minds. He was weak from the beginning to the end, from the cradle to the grave. Just a lamb. There was no element of wolf in Him. Just a lamb, but strong in the power of God. It is remarkable that in Rev 5:5, Jesus is spoken of as the King by means of the descriptive title “The Lion of the tribe of Judah”, yet in the very next verse He is described as a “Lamb”, and then three more times in this short chapter (5:8, 12, 13), He is described as “the Lamb” who is worshipped by all those who are faithful to God.

Does that picture of Jesus disappoint you?

You say, “I never knew Jesus was so weak. Now I will look for a stronger leader.” You are still used to the society of wolves, looking for the “alpha wolf” (the #1 wolf) to follow. You just don’t know how to follow this Jesus.

The whole secret, my friends, is that you don’t understand the nature of the gospel. Am I puzzling you? I think I am, because you never understood the gospel like this. What is the gospel? It is the weakness of Christ, but the power of God in Christ.

Read it carefully again. There are so many passages in the Bible you won’t understand until you get this principle clear. If you look at 2 Cor 12, you could learn the secret of how the Gospel works. It works like this. Was the apostle Paul a charismatic powerful man? He was clever. But according to the accounts we have from the early church, he was a short, balding and unimpressive character. He was not your charismatic wolf, but just another lamb. When you read his letters, you will see that indeed he had a matchless mind. But the Corinthians said that when he was in their midst he was weak (2 Cor 10:10; 1 Cor 2:3; 4:10), to the extent that they despised him (cf. e.g. 2 Cor 11:5, 6, 16). They dared to bully him, to judge him (1 Cor 4:3, 5). Strange. All our impressions and suppositions are wrong. And you know something? Paul wanted it exactly like that. He chose to be “weak” (1 Cor 2:1-3). Certainly the carnal conduct of the Corinthians grieved him. Even so, he chose to be “your servants for Jesus’ sake” (2 Cor 4:5). That is the way he wanted it, because he knew the very secret that we don’t know.

What is the nature of the Gospel?

Let me read it to you in 2 Cor 12:10,

Therefore I am well content with weaknesses, with insults, with distresses, with persecutions, with difficulties, for Christ’s sake; for when I am weak, then I am strong.

If you remember nothing more about this message, remember these words. This is the essence of the gospel -- “when I am weak, only then am I strong”. Do you understand that? I think not. It takes me a lifetime to understand this, because by nature I am not weak. It is so difficult for me to understand this. But I must understand it and I must implement it, otherwise I do not function by the power of God. If I bring people to the Lord, what I may be doing is simply to get wolves to agree to become Christians. I convince them with a better ideology but they are still wolves. They have not been changed inwardly. They refuse to become weak. They want to remain strong. They want a better ideology. I can win the world with that, and the church has in fact won the world exactly in this way. They have christianized the world and produced a christianized society of wolves. The church has become the most powerful of the wolves. It is the richest, the most influential, and by any measure the most well-organized institution. The churches in U.S.A. dominate that nation. They can sway governments. Every American President has to be careful how he speaks, because the Christians could bring them down at any time. Every President, you may have noticed, claims himself to be a Christian, otherwise he will never be voted into office.

We have a world that is simply based on christianized wolves. That is why I say that you can hardly find the true gospel anywhere anymore. We can convert the world simply by saying: “You can stay as wolves.” Just be nicer to one another, just have slightly better morals, or just believe certain doctrines to be true. You don’t have to change to believe certain doctrines to be true. Just believe that Jesus came into the world, and that He lived a life of purity in the world, and that Jesus died for us. As long as He died for me, I don’t have to die. So let Him do all the dying and I do all the living. Since He has already paid the penalties for sin, I can continue to do the sinning. I’ll just go back and make my confessions afterwards. I get my pardon and I can get on with my life. I feel secure this way. Christianity suits me just fine. I would gobble up a few more lambs and next Sunday, I would repent and say, “Father (or, Pastor), I am sorry I gobbled up a few lambs last night”. “Oh yes? You bad wolf, or you bad sheep (you seem to look like a sheep for the moment), go out and do some penance and I give you some discipline. You’ve got to pray on your knees for 15 minutes everyday for the next few months, and go out and be a better - whatever you are.”

This is Christianity today. So next week, you swallow another sheep and you say, “Father, I am sorry, I was a little bit hungry. I have not learned to eat grass yet. Change of diet takes a bit of time of adjusting to. I try to swallow grass, but it does not suit my system very well.”

Secret to the Christian life: power through weakness

We don’t know that the secret to the Christian life is power through weakness - God’s power through our weakness. “When I am weak, then am I strong.” I don’t know if I can get this message across to you. I almost didn’t want to preach this message because I know how difficult it is to grasp. I suspect that when you walk out of here today, you say, “I don’t know what to do with that message. I can’t change my diet. I like my lamb chops. As for eating grass, I am not into this kind of food yet. I am not into vegetarian diet.” You would happily go on calling yourself a Christian with your wolf nature underneath. On that day, when you meet with the Lord Jesus, it will be embarrassing, to say the least.

You will meet with the Lamb, and He will look at you and say, “Why are you here?”

“I am a Christian, and I called you Lord.” you say.

“You are not one of my own because you have a different nature. You are still a wolf.”

“I have been eating vegetarian diet half the time.” you plead.

That is not enough to make the difference.

As we close this message, there is a secret we must understand. The whole Christian life, like the Lord Jesus Himself, begins in weakness and goes through life in weakness. You have to acknowledge that you are a sinner and repent of your sins. What can be weaker and more disgraceful than being a sinner grovelling on your knees, repenting. Once you were standing straight, but now you are grovelling on your knees in weakness in order to repent. In baptism, someone takes hold of you and dumps you into the water, leaving you gasping for air, wet, and dripping all over the place. Is that not humiliation? If somebody ever did this to me as a non-Christian, I would punch him in the eyes. Here you submit to somebody grabbing you by the neck and dumping you into water. Is this not weaknesses?

Repentance is the total expression of weakness. If there is no expression of weakness, there is no repentance. Before, other people looked to you for mercy. You were the one that dispensed mercy, otherwise you would sink your sharp teeth into them. But now, you are begging for mercy, going to those whom you sinned against, saying: “Please forgive me.”

But then, do you go on in weakness? No. You still do not see much change in your life. You are still the same old person as you were before. You still think the same way and behave the same way. You thought you became a Christian to become strong. Didn’t He say He would give me abundant life and peace and joy? Are not peace and joy strengths? Where should I change?

That is one of the mysteries to me: I often see people being in the church for years and still I don’t see change. If you have not yet become utterly weak, you would never have the experience of His power. The first time I experienced God was also the first time I became truly weak. It was when I humbled myself totally before God, willing to grovel in the dust before Him, willing to become nothing before Him, that He manifested His presence to me. That is why I am a Christian today, because I have experienced God revealing His glory and His majesty to me. I could never turn back after that. Every time I am weak and willing to humble myself before Him, He continues to reveal Himself to me. I have shared in my testimonies the miracles that I experienced one after another when He kept me weak, such as in the condition of lack of food. That’s how He had to keep me weak so as to experience God all the time.

That is why Paul said: “I would much more glory in my weakness,” because then he could experience God. You are too rich. You are too healthy. You are too strong. You are too much in a high position. That is why you do not experience God. I can guarantee this: if you are rich, you won’t experience God to provide your need. You don’t need Him to. If you are in a high position, you are satisfied with yourself. Do you as a self-satisfied person experience God? Guaranteed no. You might mumble about some experience you have here and there, but you know very well that that is no deep experience of God at all. If you want to experience God in a deeper way, you’ve got to go down in weakness.

Go down in weakness

“When I am weak, then I am strong.” Why? Because a few verses before that, the Lord said to Paul: “My strength is made perfect in weakness.” It never fails. Every time you truly become weak, to be a lamb, and humble yourself into dust, God will manifest His strength and His glory to you. You can try it. If it does not work, the Bible is not true. If the Bible is not true, then you don’t want to be a Christian. Don’t ever come to church again, because this is all nonsense. Either the gospel works or it doesn’t. It is a matter of God’s strength through our weakness. It is a matter of life and death. Let’s not fool around with the gospel. I have no time for superficialities. Either God is real or we are wasting our time with this whole message. That is the way it is.

In summary, we covered 3 points related to the Gospel:

Saved -- we are saved and that salvation means transformation.

Sent -- we are sent, as lambs among wolves. This in itself is a miracle, because in the weakness of the lambs, the power of God is manifested. The lambs will overcome the wolves through God’s power (e.g. Rom 12:21; 1 John 5:4).

Strength -- the constant experience of living in God’s strength while we gladly accept our weakness. Indeed we glory in our weakness. That is the way you experience the reality of God everyday. That is how you become a dynamic Christian: a lamb that can overpower the wolves. The whole world will look on in wonder. The Lamb conquered the world through the power of God (John 16:33). That weak Lamb that you saw on earth conquers everything (Rev 17:14).

Sermon by Pastor Eric Chang, delivered on January 3, 1993, at Penang Christian Disciples Church (Malaysia), Commencement Service.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Splitting the Shema: A 'How Not To' guide

"Thus he [Paul] starts from the common ground of the basic monotheistic faith (‘There is one God, the Father’);66 first he adds ‘from whom (come) all things’, an assertion with which the Corinthians would have been familiar and with which they would no doubt have agreed; but then he also adds ‘and we to him’ or ‘for whom we exist’ (RSV). Next he appends to this the basic confession of Hellenistic or Gentile Christianity, ‘Jesus Christ is Lord’. But with this he does three striking things. First he asserts that Christ the Lord also is one; thereby he splits the Shema (Deut. 6.4), the Jewish confession of monotheism,67 between God the Father and Christ the Lord in a way that has no earlier parallel. Second he adds ‘through whom (came) all things’; thereby he splits the more regular Stoic formulation also between the one God (‘from him’, ‘to him’) and the one Lord (‘through him’; contrast Rom. 11:36) in a way that is best paralleled in Jewish Wisdom tradition (as we have seen). Third, he again adds a reference to himself and his readers – ‘and we (exist) through him’ – using the same preposition as in the preceding phrase.

66 Gentiles would have been as familiar with the belief that Zeus is the ‘Father of men and gods’ as Jews with the belief that Yahweh is the Father of Israel…

67 Deut 6.4 – Lord our God the Lord is one; 1 Cor. 8.6 – to us one God the Father…and one Lord Jesus Christ." James Dunn, Christology in the Making (1980), p. 180.

“…Paul’s ascription of kurios to Jesus, especially in passages like Phil 2.10-11; 1Cor 8.6, which equate him with Yahweh, must have sounded to Jewish ears very much like a repudiation of the [Shema] confession of Israel.” The Obedience of Faith: A Pauline Phrase in Historical Context, Don B. Garlington, Mohr Siebeck, p. 249, n.79, 1991.

“… [Col 1.15-20] is not the only example in the NT of an explicitly monotheistic statement of the Jewish variety (i.e. creational/covenantal monotheism, as opposed to pantheism or Deism), in which we find Christ set within the monotheistic statement itself. The best example of this is 1 Cor 8.6…in which the Shema is actually expanded so as to contain Jesus within it…Paul has modified Jewish monotheism so as to place Jesus Christ within the description, almost the definition of the one God…[a] radical redefinition of monotheism…What then is here being said about the one to whom the poem [Col 1.15-20] refers?... the complete humanness of Jesus, and his complete identification with a being who, though not to be thought of over against the one God of Jewish monotheism, can be spoken of in ways which imply that within the full description of this one God there must be room for (at least) bipolarity…

…the allegiance of local paganism [in the Corinthian church] to his or that ‘god’ and ‘lord’ must be met with nothing short of the Christian version of Jewish-style, Shema-style, monotheism. It is this that Paul now states [in 1Cor 8]…v.6resonates thoroughly with echoes of the far more ancient and widespread formulae from Deut 6.4[1]…[Paul] has expanded the formula, in a way quite unprecedented in any other texts known to us, so as to include a gloss on theos and another onkyrios…Paul, in other words, has glossed ‘God’ with ‘the Father’, and ‘Lord’ with ‘Jesus Christ’…There can be no mistake: just as in Phil 2 and Col 1, Paul has placed Jesus within an explicit statement, drawn from OT’s quarry of emphatically monotheistic texts, of the doctrine that Israel’s God is the one and only God, the creator of the world…Paul has redefined [the Shema] christoligically, producing what we can only call a sort of Christological monotheism. What we do with it at the level of a further analysis of Paul’s Christology, however, is as yet uncertain…

…Jesus; in this newly coined formula (newly coined, that is, either by Paul or by someone not long before) takes the place of kyrios within the Shema…[Why] has Paul produced a formula in which there is an implicit distinction betweentheos and kyrios?...He is going back to the foundations, and laying the claim that the people defined by this formula of belief form a new family with a new code of family behavior…This Christology therefore stands firmly beside that which we have found in Phil 2 and Col 1. Here, as there, we find a statement of the highest possible Christology—that is, of Jesus placed within the very monotheistic confession itself—set within an argument which itself is precisely and profoundly monotheistic. One of the strange things, in fact, about the history of the exegesis of this passage is that no-one so far as I know has commented on this fact…

…In relation to theology, too, we see the emergence of a strikingly new phenomenon: Christological monotheism…probably the first chronologically, [which] must rank as one of the greatest pioneering moments in the entire history of Christology…Continuity with Judaism of course remains: it was, after all, ‘our fathers’ who experienced the Exodus(10.1). But the Jewish worldview by itself stands in need of redefinition, a redefinition provided in the gospel. That is to say, the worldview whose boundary-marker was Torah has been challenged, even though Torah itself, in which theShema formed the basic confession of faith, is reaffirmed.” NT Wright, The Climax of the Covenant Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology: Ch. 6, Monotheism, Christology and Ethics: 1 Corinthians 8, Publishing, p 114-118; 128-132, 136, 1993.

“[In 1Cor 8.6] Paul bases his argument against his opponent’s position upon the Jewish monotheistic confession, the shema (cf. Deut 6.4), which distinguishes and marks the Jewish way of life. As Paul A. Rainbow has indicated…"Jews never applied this type of formula to their intermediaries, but reserved them very stringently for God alone”[2]. What is most astonishing here is that Paul, a Pharisee who will never relinquish his inherited monotheism,has split the shema in an unprecedented manner:[3] byglossing God with the Father and Lord with Jesus Christ, Paul aligns Jesus with the kurios of the OT (LXX) and places Jesus within the explicit Jewish monotheistic framework. He therefore has modified the Jewish religion at its most essential point and redefined the shema christoligically, indicating a dual referent in theos and kurios as well as acknowledging Christ’s sharing of the Father’s status and functions[4]…The fact that Paul does not consider eis kuriosto be an addition to the confession but a constituent part of a “Christianized” shema indicates ‘a sort of Christological monotheism’”[5]. Manifest in flesh: the epiphany Christology of the Pastoral Epistles, Andrew Y. Lau, Mohr Siebeck, p 73-74, 1996.

“…D. R. de Lacey has made a plausible plea for the possibility that in [1Cor 8.6] Paul presents a ‘Christianizing’ of the Shema…Just as his contemporaries saw a dual function in the confession, so Paul sees a dual referent in kurios and theos, glossing the latter with [‘father’] and the former with Jesous Christos.”[6] The Corinthian Correspondence, Reimund Bieringer, Peeters, p 604. 1996.

“[in 1Cor 8.6] Paul refashions, in the light of Christ, the traditional portrait of the one, sovereign, and covenant God. The Shema is reconfigured according to Christian convictions about the centrality of Christ. Thus ‘Jesus Christ’ appears at the heart of an axiomatic Jewish affirmation concerning God…Before his conversion, Paul would have prayed theShema every day and understood ‘God’ and ‘Lord’ as two terms referring to Israel’s sovereign and covenant God. At some point after his conversion, however, Paul began to understand all this differently, taking ‘God’ as referring to ‘the Father’ and ‘Lord’ as referring to ‘Jesus Christ’ (cf. esp.Phil 2:9-11; so also throughout the Pauline corpus).

In effect, then, the Shema was split into two parts, with the second of those parts focusing on Jesus Christ…Paul’s revised and ‘Christianized’ form of that most distinctive Jewish confession has the effect of transforming one’s awareness of God and his people, with Jesus Christ as the focal point of the whole theological and corporate enterprise. Likewise, these same kinds of transformation is evident in other contexts in Paul’s writings—as, for example; in Rom 3.29-30 where he again cites the Shema in a way that displaces Jewish ethnocentrism (cf. also Gal 3.20). Much more could be said about 1Cor 8.6 [requiring] greater articulation and more careful nuancing (see further Wright,Climax of the Covenant, 120-36; also more broadly Hurtado,One God, One Lord). The point here is simply that in this passage there appears a dramatic revision of a cardinal tenetin the traditional Jewish understanding of the God of the covenant—with the essence of that revision being that Jesus of Nazareth, a Judean itinerant teacher of humble origin and means, who died a humiliating and disgraceful death, is referred to, in a text written only 25 years (or so) after his crucifixion, in a fashion that puts him at the centre of rational Jewish devotion to the sovereign God of the covenant.” The Road from Damascus: The Impact of Paul's Conversion on His Life, Thought, and Ministry, Richard N. Longenecker, Eerdmans, p 127-128, 1997.

“In an astonishing adaptation of the Shema[7] [1Cor 8.5-6], Paul attributes the lordship of the one God to Jesus Christ. And yet his confession of God as one is still affirmed. Evidently the lordship of Christ was not thought of as any usurpation or replacement of God’s authority, but expressive of it…Paul’s readers [in 1Cor 8.6] could have little doubt thatPaul was attributing a role in creation to the ‘one Lord Jesus Christ’[8]. What is notable here is that the sequence of prepositions has been divided between the one God and the one Lord. Just as Paul in effect split the Shema between the one God and the one Lord, so the same formula has split God’s role as Creator between the Father and Jesus Christ. The ‘one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things’,clearly existed before the creation of the ‘all things (ta panta)’.” The Theology of Paul the Apostle, James D. G. Dunn, Eerdmans, p. 253, 267-268, 1998.

“My argument is that the exaltation of Jesus to the heavenly throne of God [in Psa 110.1] could only mean, for the early Christians who were Jewish monotheists, his inclusion in the unique identity of God, and that furthermore the texts show their full awareness of that and quite deliberately use the rhetoric and conceptuality of Jewish monotheism to make this inclusion unequivocal…The statement [in 1Cor 8.6] has been composed from two sources…one is the Shema…[and] it is now commonly recognized that Paul has here adapted the Shema and produced, as it were, a Christian version of it[9].” God crucified: monotheism and Christology in the New Testament, Richard Bauckham, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, p 31, 37, 1999.

“That Paul’s resurrection faith entailed Trinitarian, or at least binitarian, belief also emerged clearly when he split the confession of monotheism expressed in that central Jewish prayer, the Shema (Dt 6.4-5). The apostle glossed God with Father and Lord with Jesus Christ to put Jesus as risen and exalted Lord alongside God the Father… (1Cor 8.6) Here the title one Lord expanded the Shema to contain Jesus. Using the classic monotheistic text of Judaism, Paul recast his perception of God by introducing Jesus as Lord and redefining Jewish monotheism to acknowledge a personal distinction within the godhead and produce a Christological monotheism. Interestingly, the apostle did not need to argue for this redefinition of monotheism. He assumed that his Corinthian readers and hearers would agree with him. By and large, Paul reserved God for the Father, whereas he used Lord (or Son of God) for Jesus.” The tripersonal God: understanding and interpreting the Trinity, Gerald O'Collins, Paulist Press, p. 55-56, 1999.

“Paul…goes back to first principles, drawing on the Jewish Shema and putting Jesus right in the midst of the most fundamental assertion in early Judaism of its monotheistic faith.[10]…here he is reading the Shema through the later sapiental reflections on monotheism, Wisdom, and idolatry. The quote from Philo (Quod Det. 54, 84) is especially relevant at this point. Paul is taking what was formerly said of God the Father and Sophia, and now saying the same of the Father and Jesus Christ. But there is even more to this because Paul is also willing to use the term Lord of Christ, which in the Shema refers to Yahweh[11] …Thus [NT] Wright is correct that this new Christian Shema is exactly what Paul needed at this juncture of his argument to reassert a proper Christian monotheism…when a crucified Christ who took on the form of a slave for the world’s redemption becomes part of the definition of deity…” Jesus the Sage: The Pilgrimage of Wisdom, Ben Witherington, III, Fortress, p 316-317,
2000.

“In this astonishing bold association of Jesus with God [1Cor 8.5-6], Paul adapts wording from the traditional Jewish confession of God’s uniqueness, known as the Shema, from Deut 6.4… (Kyrios heis estin [LXX], translating Heb. Yahweh ‘echad). The adaptation of the Shema may be Paul’s own creative formulation here, but, as we have seen, the acclamation of Jesus as “Lord” obviously had long been a traditional feature of Christian devotional practice in Pauline Christianity and in other Christian circles as well, in both Greek and Aramaic.” Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity, Eerdmans, p 114, 2003.
There is a concerted effort by some biblical scholars to change [“gloss over, modify, redefine” or “split”, as they like to call it] the clear monotheistic creed of the one God of Israel, the Jewish Shema from Deut 6.4. What people like NT Wright and his disciples seem to miss is the fact that Jesus himself lived by this creed. In other words this was his religious belief. We know this by the answer he gave to a test given by a “teacher of the law” [Mar 12.28-34], done to see if this man [anthropos] was in line with normative Jewish beliefs and not some kind of demon or false prophet/rabbi [as many others claimed]. The passages supporting this erroneous Trinitarian understanding [1Cor 8.4-6, Phil 2.6-10 and Col 1.15-18] are based on a simple misunderstanding of Jesus’ ‘Lordship’ in relation to His God and Father[12].

In Acts 2.36 Peter explains to the astonished Pentecostal crowd that “God has made” this Jesus of Nazareth, whom people thought a prophet/rabbi/son of God, “Lord Messiah”. Therefore, according to Peter, he has been “lifted high [exalted, vindicated] by and to the right hand of God” [v. 33]. Peter goes on to cite the most quoted verse in the whole of the NT, Psalm 110.1:


“The LORD (God) says to my lord (the Messiah), sit at my right hand, until I make your adversaries your footstool.” Amplified Bible Version
This verse is used by NT writers as a sort of Messianic prototype time and time again to explain, not only to their contemporaries but also to us, where this Lord Messiah is placed in relation to his Lord and God [2 ‘Lords’ indeed but each distinct, separate and each his own person]. David describes the prophetic [future] vision of this figure as my lord [adoni]. The Hebrew translated here as my lord is not referring to another who is also ‘LORD’ [adonay, YHWH] God, since the original Hebrew word is always used for those who are not God but human beings or angelic representatives [adoni]. This tells us that the relationship between God and Jesus is that of Deity and non-Deity. The Messiah is called adoni (my lord) and in every one of its 195 occurrences, adoni means a superior who is not God. Adonai, on the other hand, refers exclusively to the One God in all of its 449 occurrences. Adonai [YHWH] is the title of Deity and adoni never designates Deity.

If the second lord of Ps 110.1 were to be described as Adonai [YHWH] it would introduce “2 YHWHs” into the Bible. This would inevitably change the clear monotheistic Jewish-Christian belief into polytheism. Therefore, Ps 110:1 serves to guard us all against supposing that there are 2 who are YHWH. In fact, this adoni is the supreme human representative and agent of the One Adonai [YHWH], God. This makes the verse the Bible’s master text for defining the Son of God in relation to the One God and Father, which would explain its frequent use by the NT authors.

Yet why is it that a number of commentaries misstate the facts about Ps 110:1? They assert that the second lord is Adonai. He is not. These commentaries seem to obscure a classic text defining God in relation to His Son. The Hebrew text assigns to the Messiah the title adoni which invariably distinguishes the one addressed from the Deity. So it is clear that the second lord figure is made a supreme human lord, who is seen by David as subject to the first LORD, YHWH and not another who is also Lord God (cp. 1 Tim. 2:5; 1 Cor. 8:4-6; Mark 12:28ff)[13]. There are many lexicons and commentaries that support the correct translation of this Davidic-Messianic Psalm. This highlights the otherwise clear negligence on the part of those who misguide and mislead honest Christian seekers of truth.

“The form ADONI (‘my lord’), a royal title (I Sam. 29:8), is to be carefully distinguished from the divine title ADONAI (‘my Lord’) used of Yahweh.” “ADONAI — the special plural form [the divine title] distinguishes it from Adonai [with short vowel] = my lords” International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, “Lord,” p. 157.

“The Hebrew Adonai exclusively denotes the God of Israel. It is attested about 450 times in the OT…Adoni [is] addressed to human beings (Gen. 44:7, Num. 32:25, II Kings 2:19 [etc.]). We have to assume that the word Adonai received its special form to distinguish it from the secular use of adon [singular of adoni, my lord]. The reason why [God is addressed] as Adonai, [with long vowel] instead of the normal adon, adoni or Adonai [with short vowel] may have been to distinguish Yahweh from other gods and from human lords” Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, p. 531.

“The form ‘to my lord,’ l’adoni, is never used in the OT as a divine reference…the generally accepted fact [is] that the Masoretic pointing distinguishes divine references (adonai) from human references (adoni)” Wigram, The Englishman’s Hebrew and Chaldee Concordance of the OT, p. 22, Herbert Bateman, “Psalm 110:1 and the NT,” Bibliothecra Sacra, Oct.-Dec., 1992, p. 438.

“Sarah used [adoni] in reference to her husband ([Abraham]Gen 18.12), Abraham used it in addressing the angelic visitors (Gen 19:2, [whom he thought were human beings]). Abraham's servant repeatedly called his master by it in Gen 24. The pharaoh of Egypt was called by this title (Gen 40:1), as well as Joseph his "vizier" (Gen 42:10). Ruth used it of Boaz before they were married (Gen 2:13). Hannah addressed Eli the priest by this term (1Sam 1:15). Saul's servants called him by the title as well (1Sam 16:16). Likewise, officers less than the king, such as Joab, had this appellation (2Sam 11:9).” Harris, et. als, Theological Wordbook of the OT, Ref. Ps 110.1.

“The Jews fully accepted the Messianic interpretation of this Psalm. Rabbi Joden said, ‘In the time to come the Holy and Blessed God will place King Messiah at His right hand, according to Ps 110.1’” The One Volume Bible Commentary, p. 699.

“In most of the instances where the title [adon] belongs to Yahweh it appears in the unique and grammatically anomalous form of Adonai; this is probably a vocalization of uncertain date and origin to distinguish the divine title from the usual adoni, ‘my lord,’ addressed to human beings.” Dictionary of the Bible, John L. McKenzie, S.J., p. 516.

“The main form of ‘Adonai’ has a different vowel point under the ‘n’ to distinguish it from the second much less common form of the word. (The second form of ‘Adonai’ is used in the plural, of men, very occasionally.)…the two words ‘adonai’ and ‘adoni’ are both formed from the root word ‘adon.’ The difference is in the vowel pointing: ‘adonai’ is formed by placing the points ‘quamets’ under nun. ‘adoni’ is formed by placing the point ‘hireq’ under nun. (Just one tiny letter different, but an enormous difference in meaning!)…One sometimes encounters people whose determination to retain Psalm 110:1 as a Trinitarian ‘proof text’ leads them to (selectively) discount the reliability of the Massoretic vowel pointing system, in favor of some otherpersonal preference, especially when it suits their particular theological bias. However unless there is compelling documented evidence for changes of this kind, they are seldom helpful. We must be very cautious about introducing arbitrary changes of this kind, lest we leave ourselves open to accusations of ‘intellectual dishonesty.” Sit Thou at my right hand (Psalm 110:1), Bible Digest, Number 86, Sept. 1998.

“We may note that there is an ambiguity in the English use of the word ‘Lord’ which is not present in the Hebrew Psalm where the first word translated ‘Lord’ is YHWH, the name of God, and the second word is ’adon which can be used of lords and masters. In both cases the Greek text has kyrios, and this facilitated the transfer to Jesus of other Old Testament texts which referred to Yahweh. Here, however, it is simply the attribute of lordship which is given to Jesus; he is not equated with Yahweh.” The Acts of the Apostles, An Introduction and Commentary, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1980, pp. 79, 80.

“The Lord of Psalm 110.1 is understood absolutely of God, while my Lord is used of the Promised Messiah. If David then refers to the Messiah (who is also his ‘son’) as my Lord, this automatically reveals that the Messiah is superior to David [and not YHWH]. Matthew is not so much concerned to prove the Davidic origin of Jesus (this is assumed in the structure of his Gospel), but rather to demonstrate that Jesus, who is both descendant of David and Messiah, is superior to David.” A Handbook On The Gospel of Matthew, by Barclay M. Newman and Philip
C. Stine (New York: United Bible Societies,
1988), p. 699.

“The citation is Ps 110.1…Jesus assumes that this second Lord is the Messiah. ‘The Lord said to my Lord’ meant ‘God said to my king’…In Hebrew the phrase says, ‘Yahweh said to adoni’ (neum YHWH la’adoni). Adoni means ‘my master’ or ‘my lord’. The devout Jew would read this phrase by covering ‘YHWH’ (Yahweh), saying instead, ‘Adonai said to Adoni’. Adonai (in distinction from adoni) means Yahweh, the God revealed to Israel. The Greek translation of the Hebrew text wrote simply here, ‘The kyrios to my kyrios’ (Eipen ho kyrios to kyrio mou), using the same word—kyrios—for both Hebrew terms. In the Greek translation, too, the first kyrios is assumed to be Yahweh-God [the second] human ‘lord’ in the Psalm’s second noun is distinguished from the deity of the first ‘LORD’, as strict exegesis suggests…adon in Hebrew means ‘master’ (BDB, 11), a term of superiority…this is all Jesus seeks to establish…(cf. Briggs in McNeile, 327; Green, 186; Taylor, 492, emphasis added, who comments: ‘The value of the saying is not thereby destroyed, since its main importance is the light it throws on the manner in which Jesus interpreted Messiahship’)…If David, then, called the…second kyrios [my lord], whom specifically was David’s first kyrios addressing? The only other person deserving any such title of majesty, to Jewish consciousness, is the Messiah…

Calvin, 3:43, raises the honest historical question: ‘Might not God have raised up someone of the human race as Redeemer to be David’s Lord and Son at the same time? For it is not God’s most essential name that is used [here], but only Adonai [Adoni] (Lord), which [name] in fact is often applied to men’…” Matthew: The Church book, Matthew 13-28, Frederick Dale Bruner, Eerdmans, p 243-244, 2007.

In this last quote the author refers to Jesus’ godhood and double nature [Catholic doctrines to be sure]. Nevertheless, it is amongst the most incisive studies I have found thus far, tackling the oft times misapplied meaning of the word adoni by some scholars and linguists, failing to recognize the distinction made by the Psalmist. In the Calvin quote the author actually corrects Adonai with Adoni. Even so, this did not stop Calvin’s correct interpretation of who the second lord was, even though he seems to be reading the verse as: ‘YHWH said to Adonai [YHWH]’.

It is understood from a proper exegetical study of the verse that the title kyrios [lord] is given to Jesus as the response of God to his obedient servant. Whereby the Son now exercises the lordship of God the Father in order to subject all things to Him:

“…for God has put all things in subjection under [Christ]. But when it says, ‘all things are put in subjection [to Christ]’, it is evident that God [Himself] is exempted whosubjected all things to [Christ]. However, when everything is subjected to [Christ], then the Son Himself will also subject Himself to [God the Father] who put all things under [Christ], so that God may be all in all” 1Cor 15.27-28 [my translation using the Amplified Bible version, emphasis added].
Thus, in Mar 12.28ff we not only learn that the Shema is the faith of Jesus but it is also “the greatest [most important] commandment of all” [v. 28]. This is the understanding that is most prevalent in mainstream, modern scholarly works regarding the Jewish Shema of Israel:

“The Shema was repeated daily by the Jews. It was the foundation text of their monotheism, which was not a speculative theory but a practical conviction… in this Jesus stood in complete agreement with Pharisaism.” Peake’s Bible Dictionary, p 696.

“We must never forget that Christianity was built on the foundation of Jewish monotheism. A long providential discipline had secured to the Jewish people their splendid heritage of faith in the One and only true God [Deut 6.4]…. This was the corner stone of the religion of Israel. These were perhaps the most familiar of all sacred words to the ears of the pious Jew. They were recited continually. Our Lord himself had them frequently in his mind (Mat 22:37; Mark 12:29, 30; Luke 10:27). That he thought of God always as the Supreme One is unquestionable.” Dictionary of Christ and Gospels, Vol. II Trinity.

“Jesus taught no new doctrine of God…The God of whom Jesus speaks is the One God of Israel (Mark 12:29), the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus has based his view on the OT revelation of God and the knowledge of the nature of God, as derived from this revelation, he accepted as valid. Nowhere do we find him stating and teaching anything as the nature of God which was impossible on the basis of the OT religion…. When he affirmed that none were good but God only (Mark 10:18)… he sought to unfold no new view of God, which would have required a special explanation and basis for the Jewish mind. But he appealed to those features of the Divine character whose recognition he could take for granted [employing] the name of Father to designate God.” Wendt, Teaching of Jesus, p 184-185, 1906.

“Jesus’ affirmation of the Shema is neither remarkable nor specifically Christian. Exalting the law is hardly what one would expect an early Christian prophet to do…The affirmation that ‘the Lord our God is one Lord’ is implicitly an injunction to recognize and obey the only God. The only God is identified as YHVH. The commandment proper which follows presupposes this identity. A comment in Josephus (Ag, Ap. 2.22 sec 190) reflects similar thinking. ‘The first that leads all of the commandments concerns God…Jesus affirmation of Deut. 6:4b, 5 is thoroughly Jewish and is unremarkable…Jesus’ double commandment summary of the Law places him squarely in the center of Jewish piety… Jesus is not presenting Israel withsome new strange doctrine.” Word Bible Commentary on Mark 12:28ff.

“It is possible to translate: ‘Yahweh, our God, is one Yahweh’ — in which case the Shema affirms that Yahweh cannot be divided into several Yahweh manifestations (poly-Yahwism), like the Baals of different sanctuaries [or the Trinity of later Nicene Christianity]. Or we may translate: ‘Yahweh is our God, Yahweh alone’ — in which case the Shema affirms that Yahweh is the only and the unique God [Jesus reaffirms this in John 17:3].” The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, New York: Abingdon Press, 1962, vol. 2, p. 427.

“The Jewish confession of faith, the Shema of Deut 6:4 will become the universal creed [cp. Zach 14.9].” The Interpreter's Bible, VI, p. 1112.

“What God is in-and-of-God self is beyond human comprehension and, therefore, not subject to revelation: no words exist to reveal God’s literal Being beyond the fundamental Israelite confession of faith: ‘Yahweh our God, Yahweh is one’ (Deut. 6:4; Mark 12:29). Beyond this, any attempt to describe God’s Being in literal terms can only amount to theological nonsense, such as the incomprehensible inclusion of three Persons within one Being, the second Person of which being 100% God and 100% man [=200% & not 100%]. God only knows how many intelligent people have been led to reject Christian faith due to the ecclesiastical misrepresentation of God as a theological absurdity.” Robert Hach, in his paper “The Biblical Concept of Mediation,” presented at Atlanta Bible College Theological Conference, 2005.

“Yahweh is the individual personal name of God (Vol. 1, 67). Elohim, though plural in form, is seldom used in the OT as such. Even a single heathen God can be designated with the plural Elohim (Jud 1:24; I Kings 11:15; 2 Kings 1:2). In Israel the plural is understood as the plural of fullness. The One God theos is the most frequent designation of God in the NT. Belief in the one, only and unique God (Mat. 23:9; Rom 3:30; I Cor 8:4, 6; Gal 3:20 I Tim. 2:5; James 2:19) is an established part of primitive Christian tradition. Jesus himself made the fundamental confession of Judaism his own and expressly quoted the Shema (Deut 6:4; Mark 12:28ff. Mat 22:37; Luke 10:27). This guaranteed continuity between the Old and the New Covenant. For the God whom Christians worship is God the Father (Acts 3:13; 5:30; 22:14; the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob). The confession of the One God appears in an expanded form in Eph 4:6… Jesus Christ does not usurp the place of God. His oneness with the Father does not mean absolute identity of being…. After the completion of his work on earth he has indeed been raised to the right hand of God,but he is still not made equal to God. Although completely co-ordinate with God he remains subordinate to him (I Cor 15:28). He represents us before God, but this is not to say that Christ is equal with God. In Revelation a distinction is always made between God and the Lamb.” New International Dictionary of NT Theology: GOD, Ed Colin Brown, p 80.

“It is believed by some that the Hebrew word ‘one’ (echad) that is used in Deut 6:4 and other verses indicates a ‘compound unity’. This is just not true. Anthony Buzzard writes:

‘It is untrue to say that the Hebrew word echad (one) in Deut. 6:4 points to a compound unity. A recent defense of the Trinity argues that when “one” modifies a collective noun like “cluster” or “herd,” a plurality is implied in echad. The argument is fallacious. The sense of plurality is derived from the collective noun, not from the word “one.” Echad in Hebrew is the numeral “one.” Isa. 51:2 describes Abraham as “one” (echad), where there is no possible misunderstanding about the meaning of this simple word.’ p. 15.

Deut 6:4 is one of the strongest texts against the Trinity. God is ‘one’, not three-in-one’ or some other plurality. This has been the rallying cry of Jews down through the ages that have stood aggressively against any form of polytheism or pantheism. Jesus quoted this verse as part of the first and great commandment (Mar 12:29-30).

It is quite inconceivable that Christ would be promoting some form of the doctrine of the Trinity while at the same time quoting Deuteronomy that God is ‘one’ to a Jewish audience who would be sure to misunderstand him. It is much more reasonable to believe that Jesus was simply affirming that if we are to love God with all our heart we must be certain who He is—the one God of Israel.” Graeser, Lynn, Shoenheit, One God & One Lord, p 442-443, 2003.
In conclusion I offer another quote by NT Wright, who not long after his surprising exegetical discoveries of 1Cor 8.6 [Climax of the Covenant, 1993], seems to retract his previous findings. This is an often found phenomenon amongst Trinitarian scholars whose beliefs fluctuate between binitarianism, tritheism or modalism:

“The answer Jesus gave [to the question about which is the greatest commandment of all] was thoroughly non-controversial, quoting the most famous Jewish prayers [Deut 6.4]…The Shema…was central to Judaism [and Jesus] then as it is now...” Jesus and the Victory of God, p 305, 1996.

[1] It is extraordinary that Nestle-Aland have no marginal reference to Deut 6.4 beside v.6, but only with v.4. Even so detailed a study as Willis [1985] does not mention the Shema. Dunn 1980, 179 f. and n.67, sees the same phenomenon as I do here, but draws different conclusions. See, similarly, Grasser 1981, 199 f.

[2] Paul A. Rainbow, “Jewish Monotheism as the Matrix for New Testament Christology: A Review Article”, NovT 33/1 (1991) 83; cf. idem, “Monotheism and Christology in 1 Corinthians 8.4-6”, unpublished D. Phil. Thesis, Oxford, 1987, pp. 66-100.

[3] L. Hurtado, One God, One Lord, Phaladelphia, 1988, pp. 97-98. Hurtado contends that Paul, having thus described Christ in 1Cor 8.6, has expressed a profound Christian adaptation of a contemporary Jewish “divine agency category” which is intended to give Christ universal superiority, “but at the same time he is the unique agent of the ‘one God’”. In this way, Christ is granted “a position of enormous importance while still protecting the uniqueness of God”. Christ is understood as an object of religious veneration: he is thought of as superior to pagan gods and the title ‘Lord’ places him alongside God the Father. Cf. idem, “The origins of the worship of Christ”, Themolios 19:2 (1994) 4-8.

[4] D. R. Lacey, “’One Lord’ in Pauline Christology”, in Christ the Lord, p. 200. He has persuasively argued that Paul, by transferring the phrase eis kurios to Jesus, “was perhaps doing no more than systematizing what was already expressed by his Christian predecessors: that Jesus was worth of divine honor…In Christ he found one who was equal with God but who was not simply the totality of deity” (pp. 191-203, 202.).

[5] N. T. Wright, The Climax of the Covenant, Edingburgh, 1991, p. 129.

[6] Cf. DE LACEY, One Lord (n.1), p. 200. On p. 196 he refers to the linking of Dt. 6,4 with Zech 14,9 which was seen as the eschatological fulfillment of the second reference “the Lord (is) one”: “At an early stage the rabbis put these two passages together, so that ‘The Lord our God’ referred to the present relationship between God and his people Israel, while the second part of the affirmation, ‘the Lord (is) one’, referred to the coming universal rule of God over all the nations”.

[7] Dunn, Christology 180; also Partings 180, 182; Wright, Climax 121, 128-32 (“Christological monotheism”—fullest statement in 114-18). Rainbow, “Jewish Monotheism” 83, notes the remarkable step of Jews using a “one” formula for any other than God. But is it correct to say that “to Paul, Jesus’ lordship can almost threaten the Father’s godship” (de Lacey, “One Lord” 200-201)?

[8] Pace Murphy-O’Connor, “1Cor 8.6”, followed by Kuschel, Born 285-91, who see only a reference to the new creation. The fact that the confession is made of Jesus Christ as the exalted Lord does not alter the content of the confession.

[9] F.F. Bruce, 1 and 2 Corinthians (NCB; London: Oliphants, 1971) 80; D.R. de Lacey, ‘”One Lord” in Pauline Christology’, in H.H.

[10] Rightly, Wright, Climax of the Covenant, 129.

[11] Paul it appears also does not flinch from calling Christ God as well, for instance, in Rom. 9.5 on which, cf. Wright, Climax of the Covenant, 237-38.

[12] If verses like Mat 27.46; John 20.17; Eph 1.17; Rev. 3.2, 12 are not clear enough in communicating to the reader that Jesus has a God, whom he calls Father, I am at a loss to know what is.

[13] Most of the following quotes are taken from The Doctrine of the Trinity, Sir Anthony Buzzard, Charles Hunting, 1993; Jesus was not a Trinitarian, Buzzard, Restoration Fellowship, 2007.