Tuesday, September 13, 2022

BECOME A SPIRITUAL WARRIOR

Ephesians 6:10 powerfully begins, “Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord - Yehovah, and in the power of his might.” Verse 11 continues, “Put on the whole armor of God - Yehovah, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.”


In Greek, ‘wiles’ is methodeia, which is where we get our English word ‘method,’ so this verse could be read, “Put on the whole armor of God - Yehovah, that you may be able to stand against the methodeia [or the methods] of the devil,” the tricks, the schemes, and the craftiness of the devil. Not enough attention is given to this verse in Ephesians or to teaching about spiritual warfare.

 

Suppose I had a choice of whom to have on my side in a spiritual battle. Someone who has been trained thoroughly in spiritual warfare or who has been taught traditional Christianity (abundant life, the purpose-driven life, the Messiah-centered life), or give me someone who has been trained in spiritual warfare. Why? because, as a sinner, as soon as you become a disciple of the lord Jesus saved by grace, the devil immediately goes on the attack against you.

 

Unfortunately, too many disciples of the Messiah Jesus never go through ‘spiritual boot camp,’ which prepares them how to fight against their enemy, the devil. Preachers and churches want to immediately take you in a different direction that does not prepare you for the spiritual battle that lies ahead. That is unfortunate. We need people who know how to fight the spiritual war.

There was no greater spiritual warrior than the Messiah Jesus himself. The gospels tell us Jesus came here not to bring peace but to bring a sword:

 

Matthew 10:34-39: Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to turn a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; 36 and a person’s enemies will be the members of his household.

The one who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and the one who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And the one who does not take his cross and follow after me is not worthy of me. The one who has found his life will lose it, and the one who has lost his life - died to self on my account will find it.

 

The Messiah came to do battle with Satan; to take the keys from death and the grave away from him and give us hope and salvation, and he wants us to learn how to fight the good fight of faith and become spiritual warriors.

 

How do we fight against Satan’s tricks, the schemes, and the craftiness? We put on the armor of our God and Father Yehovah.

 

Ephesians 6:10-17:

  

Finally, be strong in the Lord - Yehovah and in the strength of His might. Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.

 

Therefore, take up the full armor of God, so that you will be able to resist on the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm. Stand firm therefore, having belted your waist with truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having strapped on your feet the preparation of the gospel of peace; in addition to all, taking up the shield of faith with which you will be able to extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. And take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

 

Notice putting on the armor of God involves being strong in Yehovah, and the strength of His might, being enabled to do so by His indwelling presence.


We can only follow all the instruction given to us as we are enabled by the power of the spirit of Yehovah to stand firm, in truth, righteousness, sending forth the gospel of the coming peace of the kingdom of God and be able to hold up the shield of faith covered with the protection of our hope of salvation and be able to wield the sword of the Spirit – the world of God.


If we do not follow these spiritual instructions that will enable us to withstand the tricks, the schemes, and the craftiness of the devil we will fail and fall away!

Sunday, September 11, 2022

WHAT DOES THE GREEK WORD MONONGENES MEAN?

The Greek word "monogenes" is a combination of two words: "monos" which means "only" or "alone," and "genos" which means "of the same nature, kind, sort, species" (Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon of the NT); "race, stock, class, kind" (Arndt & Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the NT and Other Early Christian Literature).

It literally means "only one of its kind," and with reference to an individual it signifies that person to be a unique and one-of-a-kind being.

Jesus the Messiah is the unique, only one of his kind, Son of God. This is the meaning of "monogenes," and this is how it is translated in many of the more modern translations, which realize the true meaning of this word. Yes, we are all "sons of God" in a very real sense, but none of us are a son of God in the same sense that Jesus is. He is most definitely a "unique, one of a kind" Son of the Living God!

So where did the idea of "begotten" come from?

The confusion has arisen from the failure of some ancient translators to correctly recognize the root word of "genes", which is "genos" = "unique in kind".

Instead, they incorrectly selected the root as "gennao" = "to beget." If this was the correct root, then an additional "n" would need to be added to "monogenes" - monogenNes." It is for this reason (to have a correct translation) that the more recent versions have dropped the idea of "begotten." The concept is simply not there. The NEB has "only Son" Phillips has "only Son"

NIV has "one and only Son" LB as "only Son" (with a footnote saying, "the unique Son of God") Even the NASB, which retains "only begotten" in the text, has a footnote which states the literal translation is "unique, only one of his kind."

Notice: One religious’ group - the Mormons; teach that this phrase ('only begotten Son') means that Jesus originated by birth from God" (Ed Boggess, Gospel Advocate, Dec. 3, 1981). The Mormon scholar James Talmage, in his "Articles of Faith," says that Jesus was merely the firstborn "among the spirit-children of Elohim." Brigham Young, in his "Journal of Discourses," wrote that Jesus was "begotten; after the same manner as the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve." In other words, there was no eternal nature for Jesus; He was "uniquely begotten" by God, and thus did not exist prior to His physical birth.

Indeed, Jesus was uniquely begotten in the womb of Mary by the overshadowing of the Spirit of the only true God – Yehovah. Thus, Jesus did not pre-exist his birth, but is the beginning of the New Humanity that all those who are new creations in him are a part of!

Note: The false doctrine of the eternal generation of the Son was first taught in the third century by Origen and was advanced by Jerome and others in the fourth century to combat what they called the Arian heresy and was used in later times to oppose what they called the subordinationist theologies that deny that the Son is coeternal and coequal with the one he called the only true God – John 17:3. The main problem with eternal generation of the son of God is that it stresses an aspect of sonship that is not biblical."

It teaches that that part of the so-called Godhead referring to the son, was actually created (or "begotten"), and thus was never actually co-eternal or co-equal or co-existent with the Father. In their effort to refute the so-called Arian heresy that the son did not exist prior to is earthly birth, but that he was "begotten from everlasting," they still promoted (unknowingly) the idea of his origin or begetting, and thus that he was not co-eternal or co-existent with God. Which in fact is true, he did not co-exist with God because he was uniquely begotten by God.

Lewis Kash continues, "'Only begotten' is a phrase that was 'begotten' by the Christological controversies of the fourth century. It comes not from the pen of the apostle John, but from the pen of Jerome." In so doing, this false "translation 'only begotten' makes John 3:16 conform to the doctrine of the creeds," rather than to biblical truth!

Lewis Kash also writes, "The translators of the King James Version (1611) were Anglican churchmen and theologians who subscribed to the doctrines of the 39 Articles of the Church of England (1563), which falsely stated that the Son was 'begotten from everlasting of the Father' (Art. II). 'Begotten from everlasting' is a clear reference to the doctrine of the eternal generation. In 1604, the same year in which the translators for the KJV were selected, all English clergymen were required 'by His Majesty's authority' to pledge, 'I, John Doe, do willing and from my heart subscribe to the 39 Articles of Religion.' When King James appointed his translators to revise the Bishops' Bible of 1568, he gave them instructions to make as few changes as possible, to keep 'the old ecclesiastical words,' (such as 'church') and 'when any word has divers’ significations,' to keep that 'which has been most used by the most eminent fathers.'"

Thus, the Son of God is given an origin, and in so doing it denies His eternal coexistence with God and denies his so-called deity! Jesus was not the "only begotten" Son of God. However, he most definitely is the unique, one-of-a-kind, Son of God. The word itself says nothing about begetting, only uniqueness!

This was clearly understood in the early translations of Scripture. "The second century Old Latin version faithfully translated the nine NT occurrences of monogenes as UNICUS = 'unique.'

Dr. Jack P. Lewis (who was head of the Bible Dept. at Harding Graduate School of Religion) wrote, "The earlier Latin Bible had used UNICUS to translate monogenes, and the earliest creeds had so used UNICUS.

The word UNIGENITUS then entered theological discussion and became a vested interest to theologians" (Gospel Advocate, May 1, 1986).

The idea of "only begotten" is not even in the word "monogenes." Rather, it speaks of one who is unique in some very special way; different from all others; one of a kind.

Dr. Moody insisted that 'monogenes' means 'one,' 'only,' or 'unique' rather than 'only begotten.' Moody's major arguments include the following:

(1) The standard lexicons support this meaning!

(2) The Old Latin MSS rendered 'monogenes' by the Latin 'unicus' ('only') rather than 'unigenitus' ('only begotten'). In the Vulgate Jerome CHANGED 'unicus' to 'unigenitus' for theological reasons. The Vulgate exercised a formidable influence on the AV and subsequent English translations.

(3) The LXX (Septuagint) use of 'monogenes' for the Hebrew 'yahid' and NT usage of the term in Luke: 7:12; 8:42; 9:38; Hebrews 11:17 clearly support the meaning 'only.' (4) The reference in I Clement 25:2 to the phoenix bird (which in mythology was neither born nor begotten) as 'monogenes' demands the meaning 'only one of its kind.'"

The ISBE continues: "Although 'genos' is distantly RELATED to 'gennan,' 'to begat,' there is little Greek justification for the translation of 'monogenes' as 'only begotten.' The word describes Jesus' uniqueness, not what is called in Trinitarian theology His 'procession.'

In conclusion, assessment of the linguistic evidence seems to indicate that 'unique' may be good translation for all occurrences of monogenes in the Johannine literature."

Let's assume for a moment that "monogenes" does signify a "begetting." IF this is true (which, of course, it is NOT), then notice the following: Hebres 11:17 (KJV) reads, "By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac; and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten (monogenes) son." According to this passage in the KJV, Isaac is the only begotten son of Abraham. We certainly know that Abraham begat Isaac (see Matthew 1:2 and Acts 7:8, where we find the word "gennao" = "to beget"). But, if Isaac is the only son begotten by Abraham, then how does one explain Gal. 4:22-23?! "For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born (from the word "gennao" = "to beget") after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise." Notice also vs. 29: "But as then he that was born ("gennao") after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now." Ishmael was begotten by Abraham!! Thus, Isaac was not the only begotten son of Abraham. The KJV has Scripture contradicting itself!

The problem is easily cleared up, however, when one realizes that "gennao" (to beget) is not the root used in "monogenes." Thus, the word "monogenes" does not refer to a begetting, but rather to the fact that one is unique, one of a kind. Isaac was not the only son begotten by Abraham (contrary to the teaching of the KJV in Hebrews 11:17), however, Isaac was the unique and one-of-a-kind son of Abraham. Unique in what way? Isaac was the "son of promise!" Ishmael was not! This is what Hebrews 11:17 is teaching!

Again, notice Hugo McCord's observation: "The word ('monogenes') can refer to Isaac, but not as 'only begotten,' which phrase Jerome and the KJV and ASV INSERTED in Hebrews 11:17. That insertion makes the writer of Hebrews contradict Moses, who wrote that Abraham had at least seven other sons besides Isaac. But the writer of Hebrews makes clear how Isaac was a monogenes -- a unique person" -- he was the only son of promise! (Gospel Advocate, 3/20/86).

From the scriptures we understand that Jesus was a unique one-of-a-kind man, begotten in the womb of Mary by the overshadowing of the Spirit of God. Luke 1:35: And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born[e] will be called holy, the Son of God. Jesus was the second man specially created by God the first being Adam who as a result of being created by God [Genesis 2:7] is called the son of God Luke 3:38: the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.

CAN WE PRAY TO THE LORD JESUS

Note: Acts 7:59: As Stephen was facing imminent death, he called on the lord Jesus to receive his spirit. Some might argue that this was an extreme case or that Stephen was inspired. But if we do what inspired men did in serving God, how can we be wrong? Stephen prayed to Jesus in this account".

The question is really a rather simple one: Does Acts 7:59 suggest Stephen prayed to Jesus? The definition of the word "prayer" is to implore, beseech, entreat, supplicate; to ask very earnestly. It is an act of communication between a man/woman and God - Yehovah or His son Jesus. There is no question that Stephen addressed himself to the ascended Saviour whom God had declared was both lord and Messiah. [Acts 2:36] Thus, by definition, Stephen prayed.

The problem for some disciples, lies in the fact that he clearly addressed himself to Jesus, which these disciples feel is not permitted. They say we should only pray to the Father, and never to the Son. It seems that Stephen was unaware of this restriction.

Some have argued that the common Greek word for prayer is not employed in this passage, and thus Stephen did not technically pray to anyone that day, and certainly not to Jesus. He just "called upon" Jesus, or implored or entreated or supplicated him, but did not "pray" to him. We get the technical implication, but the fact is clearly stated in the text that Stephen addressed himself to Jesus, regardless of how one chooses to characterize the exact nature of that address.

The KJV has confused this issue somewhat by adding to the text of Acts 7:59. It reads, "And they stoned Stephen, calling upon GOD, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit." The word "God" is not in the biblical text. It is an unwanted addition by mere men.

Note the comment of Adam Clarke in his commentary on the book of Acts: "The word 'God' is not found in any MS or version, nor in any of the primitive fathers except Chrysostom. It is not genuine and should not be inserted here" (volume 5, page 735). It is clearly an addition to the text and misleads the reader. There is absolutely no authority for such a flagrant addition to Acts 7:59, and such is inexcusable.

Some have suggested that the NIV has just as flagrantly added the word "prayed" to the text of Acts 7:59. The word so translated by the NIV translators is "epikaleomai" which literally means "to call upon." Although not the common word in Greek for "prayer," it was/is understood to be an acceptable synonym. It is a "calling upon" or an "appeal to the lord Jesus," and Acts 7:59 is given as an example of this usage (A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, page 294). Although the wording may be somewhat different (due to the emphasis upon the nature of the appeal), nevertheless this is still a case of men/women appealing to or calling upon the lord Jesus and that is "prayer." This has been clearly understood by reputable scholars for centuries, as even cursory research will quickly reveal.

Often in the NT the believer calls on God or the Messiah, or the name of God – Yehovah or the name of the Messiah - Jesusin prayer.

Note: Acts 7:59: And as they were stoning Stephenhe called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit”, as an example of this "calling upon" lord in "prayer". The directing of a prayer to Jesus is a mark of faith in him as the Messiah. The Greek "epikaleomai" is clearly understood by the best Greek scholars to be synonymous with the concept of "prayer." And, further, Acts 7:59 is viewed as a perfect example of a man "calling upon" in prayer to the Messiah Jesus. Thus, the NIV was perfectly within its rights, according to accepted Greek usage, to translate this word as "prayer."

Jesus gives us an example that we should pray to our God and Father with thanksgiving and praise as our offering. However, there are times that we can call upon the one whom God – Yehovah has made lord over all!

ADDED TO THE LORD - YEHOVAH

Acts 2:47 (KJV): "And the LORD [Yehovh] added 'to the church' daily such as should be saved." The phrase "to the church" is not in the original text. It has been added. There are hardly any reputable translations which say "to the church" in this passage. It is an incorrect and false rendering.

The original Greek literally says: "And the LORD [Yehovah] added together daily the ones being saved." The passage does not tell us specifically to what or to whom those being saved were added. It merely states that all those being saved were "added together" or "numbered together."

Note: “The Lord [Yehovah] added to their number day by day those who were being saved." [ESV] That is exactly what the passage says in the original Greek. Again, the phrase "to the church" was an addition to the text of the Bible.

Some might argue that if God [Yehovah] is taking all the saved ones and collecting them together into a common group, then this seemingly suggests the addition of the saved ones is to the group itself. If there was no other teaching on this matter, this might well be a logical conclusion. However, there is further teaching which suggests that the saved are added to something else entirely, and that all those who are thus added to this "something else" are "numbered together”.

However, such is nevertheless not stated in the text, and for translators to impose their own interpretation upon the original text (however true that interpretation might be) goes beyond the work of a translator. The result, therefore, becomes more a commentary than a translation.

Acts 2:41, in the KJV, reads: "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls." At least in this passage the phrase "unto them" is placed in italics in the KJV. It is thereby acknowledged that this phrase has been added by the translators to the text of the Bible.

In the original Greek the latter part of the verse literally reads "And there were added in that day, about three thousand souls." The verse does not tell us to what these 3000 were added. It only says they were added. So, we see that the KJV translators did some assuming and interpreting, and then they added to the text. It is assumed by some that it was to the other saints they were added [i.e.: the church - the called - out Assembly].

However, this is merely an assumption. There is no question but what they were "numbered together with the other saints, but is it possible there was something else to which or to whom these saved ones were added? If so, what or who was it?

The answer is found in Acts 5:14. Again, notice the KJV (which in this passage gives the correct translation of the original): "And believers were the more added to the Lord [Yehovah], multitudes both of men and women."

Some translations continue with the concept that it was "to the church - the called-out Assembly" that the believers were added. The NIV, for example, reads, "more and more men and women believed in the LORD [Yehovah] and were added to their number." This is not a correct translation of the original.

However, the KJV, ASV, RSV, and even the LB (and other translations as well) all correctly translate the original here - "added to the LORD [Yehovah]."

This concept has been largely overlooked in our preaching and teaching. We tend to proclaim that when one "obeys the gospel – the good news message about the coming kingdom of God" they are then added to the church [called-out Assembly]. Brethren, such preaching and misses the mark. People are not added to the called-out Assembly, they are added to the LORD [Yehovah]! And all who are added to the LORD [Yehovah] are then "numbered together" with the universal called-out Assembly. It is Yehovah who does the adding of people to the church [called – out Assembly] and He adds them to Himself. All those who are being saved; who are being added to the LORD; are then numbered among the family of God: His one universal body; the called – out Assembly of God. God does not add anyone to a particular group; Baptist, Methodist, etc., rather He collects them all together into one universal body – the called-out Assembly, and the common bond which they all share is: they are new creations "in the Messiah Jesus".

So, we should concentrate and focus our energy upon seeking to bring people to believe and trust in the only true God – Yehovah and to believe in the one whom He has sent, the Messiah Jesus.

Those who are added to the LORD – Yehovah are those who are worshiping Him as new creations in the Messiah Jesus, in the Spirit.

John learned this lesson about assuming that your group of believers are the only ones acting on behalf of the lord Jesus: Mark 9:38-40: John said to him, “Teacher, we saw someone  casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he was not following us [not a part of our group]." But Jesus said, “Do not stop him, for no one who does a mighty work in my name will be able soon afterward to speak evil of me. For the one who is not against us is for us.

All who believe and obey the one true God – Yehovah and believe and obey the one whom He has sent are members of the universal called-out Assembly of God, which is the body of the Messiah Jesus, that God has appointed to be the head of His Assembly of called-out ones!

Members of the universal called-out Assembly are scattered throughout the world, and some attend churches in Christendom today. God knows the hearts of all those who believe and trust in Him!

2 Chronicles 16:9a. For the eyes of Yahweh move to and fro throughout the earth that He may strongly support those whose heart is completely His.

 

Wednesday, September 7, 2022

AN APOSTOLLIC APPLICATINO OF AN ABRAHAMIC AWARENESS

 

Romans Chapter 4

The French theologian and Protestant reformer John Calvin (1509-1564) wrote, "Justified by faith is he who, excluded from the righteousness of works, grasps the righteousness of the Messiah through faith, and clothed in it, appears in God's sight not as a sinner but as a righteous man.

The apostle Paul spoke similarly in his lament of the Jewish misconception of the source of righteousness, declaring them zealous for God but "ignorant of the righteousness that comes from God," thus "seeking to establish their own" Romans 10:1-3: Brothers and sisters, my heart's desire and prayer to God on behalf of the Jewish people is that they would be saved. I can assure you that they are deeply devoted to God, but they are misguided. They don't understand [how to receive] God's approval. So, they try to set up their own way to get it, and they have not accepted God's way for receiving his approval.

What these Israelites were woefully unaware of is that one's justification and salvation are "gifts" dispensed "by God’s grace through the redemption which is in the Messiah Jesus" Romans 3:22-24: Everyone who believes has God's approval through faith in Jesus the Messiah. There is no difference between people. Because all people have sinned, they have fallen short of God's glory.

God is "the justifier of the one who has the faith of Jesus" Romans 3:25-26.  God showed that the Messiah is the throne of mercy where God's approval is given through faith in the Messiah's as a sin-offering sacrifice. In his patience God waited to deal with sins committed in the past. He waited so that he could display His approval at the present time. This shows that He is a God of justice [coupled with love], a God who approves of people who believe in Jesus.

Romans 5:1-2: "Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our lord Jesus the Messiah, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into the grace in which we stand"

Paul, in his teaching and preaching the good news of the coming Kingdom of God, never strays from the truth that man, by his/her own effort, cannot justify or redeem himself/herself before God, nor can he/she, by his/her own effort, earn eternal salvation. Thus, while still sinners, we are in a state of enmity against God. God took the initiative and dealt with the sin problem through the redeeming act of His son’s sin-offering sacrifice which reconciled all mankind to Himself. It is a gift, not wages due, a truth which many today still struggle to grasp.

Romans 4:4-5: "Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but what he is due. And to the one who does not work but trusts Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness.

Romans 3:23-26: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in the Messiah Jesus: whom God set forth [to be] a propitiation – mercy seat, through faith, in his blood, to show His righteousness because of the passing over of the sins done in the past, in the forbearance of God; for the showing, [I say], of His righteousness at this present season: that He might be just, and the justifier of him that has faith in Jesus.

Romans 6:23: For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life in the Messiah Jesus our lord.

Romans 5:15-19: But the gracious gift is not like the offense. For if by the offense of the one [man] the many died, much more did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one man, Jesus the Messiah, overflow to the many. The gift is not like that which came through the one [man] who sinned; for on the one [man’s] hand the judgment arose from one offense, resulting in condemnation, but on the other hand the gracious gift arose from many offenses, resulting in justification. For if by the offense of the one [man], death reigned through the one [man], much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one [man], Jesus the Messiah.

So then, as through one offense the result was condemnation to all mankind, so also through one act of righteousness the result was justification of life to all mankind. For as through the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one [man] the many will be made righteous.

Such terms as "free gift," which Paul uses frequently, and God's "grace," and "faith of Jesus" as well as "faith in Jesus," still confuse disciples who, like the Jews of Paul's day, seek to obtain the favor of God through their own effort. Yes, such persons "have a zeal for God, but not in accordance with knowledge" [Romans 10:2]

There is nothing you or I can ever be or do that will in some way entitle us to justification, redemption, and salvation. One cannot earn a gift; one can only gratefully and humbly receive it, and that is accomplished entirely by faith. Our faith in the Messiah Jesus lays hold of the gift of justification through the faith of the Messiah Jesus It is his faith that saves; it is our faith that receives that gift. Then, as redeemed ones, we evidence our faith and trust in him through acts of love and gratitude throughout the remainder of our days, as per the truth conveyed in the latter part of this powerful passage: "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of [your] works, that no one should boast. For we are His workmanship, created in the Messiah Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them" [Ephesians 2:8-10]. These good works are for those who are already in the Messiah Jesus, as new creations; they are not works prescribed by God that one must perform in order to be in union with the lord Jesus. They are good deeds performed lovingly and gratefully by those who are saved, not deeds that must be performed by lost souls in order to gain salvation.

In order to demonstrate the above truths, the apostle Paul, in chapter four of his epistle to the Romans, provides the example of Abraham, with special emphasis being given to how he came to be justified in the sight of God. Was Abraham counted as righteous because of something he himself did (by virtue of some good work), or did God declare him righteous and justified for another reason not associated with any personal performance [good works] or obedience to any law (a legal requirement)? Paul goes to great lengths in to show that Abraham was not justified or regarded as righteous by virtue of good works, but by simple trusting faith! "For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about; but not before God" [Romans 4:2].

Romans 4:4-5: "Now to the one who works, his wage is not reckoned as a favor, but as what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness"

It is faith, not works, that brings each of us into a saving relationship with the Father. At our best, we are all sinners in His sight, fallen creature’s incapable of being righteous; for "there is none righteous, not even one" [Romans 3:10]; "there is none who does good, not even one" [Romans 3:12]. "By works of law no flesh will be justified in His sight" [Romans 3:20]. Instead, you and I are "justified by God’s grace through the redemption which is in the Messiah Jesus" [Romans 3:24]. Thus, Paul declares, "we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law" [Romans 3:28]. Salvation, justification, sanctification, righteousness is not found in a legal system, but are forever secured by faith/trust/belief in a loving savior. "Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus the Messiah, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand" [Romans 5:1-2].

Paul narrows his focus even more in Romans chapter four by putting forth for view the physical act of circumcision, something well-known to the people of Israel, but less so to the Gentiles. Is God's grace tied to a physical act (even an act commanded by Him)? Will God only justify and regard as righteous those who have submitted to this outward act? Or is His gift of grace much broader in scope? Most of the Jews of Paul's day, and even many of the Jewish Christians, embraced the former view. As a result, the Jerusalem Conference [Acts 15] was even held to address this view (as was the epistle of Paul to the Galatians).

Notice: "And some men came down from Judea and began teaching the brethren, 'Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved'" (Acts 15:1). Paul could not have disagreed more with such a misguided teaching. He "opposed Peter to his face," for Peter "feared the party of the circumcision" and went along with their teaching, even though that teaching was in opposition "to the truth of the Gospel" [Galatians 2:11-14]. Paul made it clear that "if righteousness comes through law, then the Messiah died needlessly" [Galatians 2:21]. "Man is not justified by the works of law. ...for by the works of law shall no flesh be justified" [Galatians 2:16]. Instead, as this same verse declares, we are justified through the faith of the Messiah Jesus, a justification and imputed righteousness we obtain by means of believing in him and what he accomplished for us.

"So then, as through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men, even so through one [man] act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men. For as through the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the one [man] the many will be made righteous" [Romans 5:18-19]. Paul makes it clear that neither circumcision nor uncircumcision "means anything;" but what is important is our faith evidencing itself in love [Galatians 5:6].

Indeed, "you have been severed from the Messiah, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace" [Galatians 5:4]. Our example of this principle, says Paul, is Abraham. This man was reckoned by God as righteous. "How then was it reckoned? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised?" [Romans 4:10]. The answer, which Paul gives in that same verse, is: "Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised." This was a jaw-dropping revelation to those steeped in Jewish law and tradition! Yes, circumcision was a command of God Himself, yet the purpose of this act was never intended to justify or make one righteous in the sight of God. Rather, circumcision was simply a "sign" and "seal of the righteousness of the faith which Abraham had while uncircumcised" [Romans 4:11]. Thus, we are all called to "follow in the steps of the faith of our father Abraham which he had while uncircumcised" [Romans 4:12]. We are all justified and regarded by God as righteous "by faith in accordance with grace" [vs. 16].

Paul is seeking to convey an important divine principle here, a principle that transcends any outward religious act (even if that act had the power of divine command behind it).

The principle is: we are all sinners; there are none who are righteous; we are fallen creatures deserving of death, and we ourselves are powerless to alter that situation or its outcome. Thus, justification, salvation, sanctification, righteousness is all unattainable by our own effort. Therefore, a loving, merciful, gracious God acted while we were yet sinners, ungodly, and in a state of enmity against Him. He dealt fully, once for all, with the sin problem, and He offers this FREE GIFT of grace to anyone who was willing to accept it BY FAITH.

This gift was not tied to any outward act that a man/woman might perform, for if it were then this blessing "could not be reckoned as a gift, but as what is due" [Romans 4:4]. God owes us nothing, but He has freely given us everything pertaining to an abundant life secured by the Messiah Jesus. We were all "dead in our trespasses and sins," and we were "by nature children of wrath" [Ephesians 2:1, 3]. His wrath was our "due." "But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with the Messiah (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up with him, and seated us with him in the heavenly places, in the Messiah Jesus, in order that in the ages to come He might show the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in the Messiah Jesus. For by grace, you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one should boast" [Ephesians 2:4-9].

God's desire for mankind has always been that they would reflect His own nature in their daily lives and in their interactions with one another. However, as fallen creatures with a nature prone to sinful attitudes and actions, we find ourselves incapable of reflecting perfectly the flawless nature of our God and of His son who is the outshining of His glory. Thus, anything we ourselves offer to Him will always come short of achieving His favor. If we are to be counted as righteous and declared justified in His sight, that must come from Him as a gift of grace, for not a one of us can ever earn such a standing, that Jesus did as the only perfect man who has ever lived.

The Jews of Paul's day, however, felt that such divine favour could be had by performing certain religious rites and rituals, with physical circumcision being high on that list. Paul sought to show them, via the example of Abraham, that circumcision did not have that purpose or power. It was a sign and seal, a mere symbol, but it was never designed to be an act by which a grace or blessing was conferred. If Paul reasons, one is declared righteous and justified (and even saved) by a certain religious act (circumcision), then how do these religionists explain that Abraham was declared justified by God, and seen as righteous by God, fourteen years before he was circumcised? "Then Abraham believed in Yehovah; and He reckoned it to him as righteousness" [Genesis 15:6]. Paul quoted this very verse in Galatians, and then stated:

Galatians 3:6-9: "Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the Gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, 'All the nations shall be blessed in you.' So then, those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer".

Circumcision, therefore, had absolutely nothing to do with Abraham's standing with God. That standing was by grace through faith, just as it is with us today!

Paul posed this very question in his epistle to the Romans. "'Is the bestowal of a righteous standing before God connected with the observance of ordinances or apart entirely from such things?

Paul answers his question by citing the case of Abraham who was declared righteous in answer to his faith, fourteen years before he was circumcised. circumcision any essential relation to this great blessing.

This methodology and process "has been the same through all history"; it is just as applicable to us today. Our justification, our salvation, our being reckoned as righteous in the sight of God is by grace through faith, and absolutely NO religious rite or ritual is required in addition to that divine process! We can even go back as far as Noah and perceive the same principle: "Noah became an heir of the righteousness which is according to faith" [Hebrews 11:7]. Like Abraham, Noah's righteousness was not works-based, it was faith-based. Yes, they showed their faith [James 2], but their standing with God was not based on these works; rather, their standing was based on their FAITH which then motivated their actions. In Ephesians 2:10 we are informed that God desires His redeemed ones to engage in good works. Yet, these good works are not designed to save us, they are simply designed to give us ways to show the depth and genuineness of our faith in and love for Him.

God’s determines to make righteousness available by His amazing grace to those who will humbly accept it by faith. ... For example: far from being the cause of his acceptance with God, Abraham's lifestyle was the result of his acceptance. God did not declare him righteous because his good works, but rather Abraham lived a good life because God had freely justified him according to his faith that all that God had promised him would come true.

Through faith God's grace transcends religious rites and rituals, it transcends ceremony and tradition, it transcends rigid rules and regulations!

God's grace is for those who have a heart of faith, and who then, in love for God and their fellow man, evidence that love and faith in their daily lives.

Just so, baptism today is an outward sign that we are the Messiah's in faith and identification; but how deadly is the delusion that baptism amounts to anything before God! God does not justify those observing ordinances, but sinners who believe, have faith in Him. If you are still regarding baptism, or the Lord's Supper, or 'the Mass,' or 'Christening,' or 'Confirmation,' as having anything whatever to do with God's declaring you righteous, then you do not understand!

Neither baptism nor the lord's Supper (upon both of which thousands have trusted as 'sacraments' commending them unto God) has power to give any standing whatever before a righteous God. 

The nature of Abraham's faith was essentially the same as that of the NT believer, despite the difference in time: Abraham looked forward to something God would do, whereas the Christian looks back to what God has provided in the Messiah Jesus.

The fact that Abraham exercised faith in God whilst still uncircumcised is a proof that the essence of religion does not depend upon externals. (i.e., circumcision): A lesson which we need to learn today, even as did the contemporaries of Paul" "The state of justification was attributed to Abraham himself before he was circumcised. Justification is the result of faith.

Note: Why would Paul spend so much time on this topic when he, like we are today, was under a new covenant? The first new covenant command given by the lord Jesus is: Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, the time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent, and believe the gospel [about the soon coming kingdom of God]. [Mark 1:14-15]

Also: Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus the Messiah for the remission of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the holy spirit. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord - Yehovah our God shall call. [Acts 2:38-39]

The reason Paul spent so much time proving that is was no longer necessary to abide by the law given through Moses was because too many disciples of Jesus Christ were being deceived by false “apostles” to make the very same mistake the Jews made when it came to keeping their religious rites and rituals. They had come to place far more significance upon the signs, seals, and symbols than they did on the realities which they signified.

We are saved by grace through faith, just as Abraham was. Yet, when signs and symbols become sacraments, we lose sight of the substance! Circumcision is not what saved Abraham, any more than baptism in water is what saves you or me! Paul declares that the grace Abraham received through faith is available to us as well.

Note: Don’t ever make the mistake that by being baptized and observing the lord’s supper that securing for yourself salvation and a "right-standing" before God. "Yehovah intended the rite of circumcision to be a seal of authenticity on the covenant between a man and his God. Similarly, baptism follows one's decision to trust in Jesus the Messiah. It's a public declaration" of a decision and commitment of faith to die to self already established in one's heart. Thus, "one cannot be saved through the rite of baptism, nor must one be baptized in order to be saved" You in obedience to the lord Jesus seek to be baptized after you have repented and had a complete change of heart and want to die to self in order to be alive in the Messiah Jesus, become a new creation in him! That is simply the purpose of baptism.

Many believe that when one was baptized in water that was the precise split-second of salvation. But, if a person who believed with all his heart in the lord, and had repented, and had confessed him as lord, but died before being baptized, that person went straight to hell to be tortured by forever! Grace and faith couldn't save that person. God know the hearts of all those who desire to come to Him and obey Him and if someone has come to believe in Him with all their heart and being, and in the one whom He has sent, but dies before they are baptized, they will be in the coming kingdom of God!

Baptism is a "sign" and "seal" of the reality of a sacred covenant, just as a wedding ceremony and a signed marriage certificate is a "sign" and "seal" of the reality of a sacred covenant between a loving couple. They didn't make a covenant with one another at the ceremony or when they returned the signed document to the county clerk. The ceremony and the document were a "sign" and "seal" of the reality of that covenant they had already made with one another in their hearts. They didn't "enter into covenant" with one another at the split-second they uttered the words "I do" - those words were simply a public demonstration of and a verbal testimony to a life-commitment they had already made to one another. So also, is baptism. The Jews had elevated circumcision to something it was never intended to be, just as too many Christians have done with baptism. Both were signs, seals, and symbols; neither were sacraments. God's relationship with men is not based on some ceremony or religious rite; our justification and salvation are not tied to a deed performed in compliance with some ordinance or law. We are justified and counted as righteous by faith!

Whatever parallel exists between baptism and circumcision as here stated by Paul argues for faith before baptism and for baptism as the sign and seal of the faith one already had before baptism.

Consider the example of Cornelius, for his acceptance by God was quite like that of Abraham. When did God acknowledge Cornelius? Was it before he was baptized or after? It was before Acts 10: Later, when Peter recounted this event to those assembled at the Jerusalem Conference, he said, "Brethren, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles would hear the word of the Gospel and believe. And God, who knows the heart, testified to them giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He also did to us; and He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe that we are saved through the grace of the lord Jesus, in the same way as they also are" [Acts 15:7-11]. No mention of baptism.

Yes, baptism served a purpose; it was important; but that purpose was not to impart salvation, justification, or righteousness. In Peter's second sermon, he shared again some of the main points of his first sermon on the day of Pentecost. However, he quite noticeably left out any mention of baptism. "Therefore, repent and return, so that your sins may be wiped away" [Acts 3:]. Most assuredly, baptism has its place in the teaching and practice of the lord’s disciples, just as circumcision did among the Jews.

However, many have elevated a symbol, sign, and seal to a sacrament, and we have given it a power that the lord never intended for it to possess. Brethren we need to be careful not to preach and teach tradition as though it were truth, for in so doing we tend to invalidate the truth by our elevation of tradition [Matthew 15:1-9].

Perhaps the apostle Paul summed it up best when he informed the conflicted church in Corinth, "The Messiah did not send me to baptize, but to preach the Gospel [the good news about the coming kingdom of God], ...so that the cross of Messiah would not be made void" [1 Corinthians 1:17]. Paul clearly perceived an important distinction between the act of baptism in water and the "Good News" he was called to proclaim; the former being distinct from the latter A perception much needed today!